Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

The slower rotation of planet-hosting stars revisited

Abstract

Previous studies combined rotation periods derived from Kepler photometry, stellar parameters from previous Gaia Data Releases, and planet hosts from the NASA Exoplanet Archive to conclude that statistically planet-hosting stars rotate slower than stars without detected planets. Here, we revisit these studies by using similar Kepler rotational period sample, but with an updated Gaia DR3-based stellar parameter catalogue and an updated exoplanet catalogue. We apply minimal sample cuts in evolutionary state, metallicity, and distance, and then model the stellar rotation period as a function of effective temperature alone. For each star, we derive the ratio of its observed period to the temperature-expected period, and compare the ratio distributions for the planet-host and non-host stars. For periods shorter than 20 d, the planet-host distribution of this ratio is shifted towards longer periods; the period-ratio median is ~15% larger for hosts than for non-hosts (p_KS = 2.4 x 10^-4). We also examine the recently published TESS All-Sky Rotation Survey (TARS) and find a similar trend. However, the strongly structured period distribution precludes a robust comparison between the host and the non-host stars. Therefore, the updated analysis, using more robust stellar and planetary parameters, recovers the previously reported association, strengthening the case for a genuine connection between stellar rotation and planet occurrence.

Versions

Related

  1. Tracking the evolution of sub-Neptunes. I. Gyrochronology of planet hosting stars
    Alessandro C. Lanzafame, Vincenzo Drago, Nino Greco +3
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesPlanetary science & exoplanetsarXiv
  2. Coherent radio emission at 45 MHz from the nearby planet-hosting star GJ 725A
    H. W. Edler, J. R. Callingham, I. Davis +7
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  3. Planets Around Solar Twins/Analogs (PASTA). III. Chemical clock relations in planet-hosting solar analogs
    Qinghui Sun, Serat M. Saad, Yuan-Sen Ting +10
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  4. Radio and high-energy variable emission from a multi-wavelength follow-up study of the infant planet-hosting star V1298,Tau
    M. Damasso, D. Viganò, R. Spinelli +9
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  5. TOI-1408: A Metal-rich Star with Lithium Overabundance Hosting a Multi-planet System.
    G A Galazutdinov, S A Korotin, D B Poklad +2
    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{binnenfeld2026slower,
  title = {{The slower rotation of planet-hosting stars revisited}},
  author = {Avraham Binnenfeld and Amitay Sussholz and Simchon Faigler and Tsevi Mazeh},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.08267},
  eprint = {2611.08267},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08267},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The slower rotation of planet-hosting stars revisited
AU  - Avraham Binnenfeld
AU  - Amitay Sussholz
AU  - Simchon Faigler
AU  - Tsevi Mazeh
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/05
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.08267
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08267
AB  - Previous studies combined rotation periods derived from Kepler photometry, stellar parameters from previous Gaia Data Releases, and planet hosts from the NASA Exoplanet Archive to conclude that statistically planet-hosting stars rotate slower than stars without detected planets. Here, we revisit these studies by using similar Kepler rotational period sample, but with an updated Gaia DR3-based stellar parameter catalogue and an updated exoplanet catalogue. We apply minimal sample cuts in evolutionary state, metallicity, and distance, and then model the stellar rotation period as a function of effective temperature alone. For each star, we derive the ratio of its observed period to the temperature-expected period, and compare the ratio distributions for the planet-host and non-host stars. For periods shorter than 20 d, the planet-host distribution of this ratio is shifted towards longer periods; the period-ratio median is ~15% larger for hosts than for non-hosts (p_KS = 2.4 x 10^-4). We also examine the recently published TESS All-Sky Rotation Survey (TARS) and find a similar trend. However, the strongly structured period distribution precludes a robust comparison between the host and the non-host stars. Therefore, the updated analysis, using more robust stellar and planetary parameters, recovers the previously reported association, strengthening the case for a genuine connection between stellar rotation and planet occurrence.
ER  -