The Greedy Bump Bias: Local Profiling Geometry and the Look-Elsewhere Effect
Abstract
When fitting a localized signal whose position or shape is not known in advance, one typically allows these parameters to vary together with the signal amplitude and chooses the values that maximize the likelihood. This freedom has two related statistical consequences. If a genuine signal is present, its fitted amplitude will be affected by a positive bias; otherwise, the same freedom increases the chance of finding an unusually signal-like background fluctuation, giving rise to the look-elsewhere effect. We show that these two effects can be understood as consequences of the same local geometry of the family of signal templates. We study this connection in a Gaussian matched-filter model, where a smooth D-dimensional family of normalized templates describes the unknown signal location or shape. In the normalized matched-filter problem, the curvature of a genuine signal peak and the fluctuations that determine the curvature of a high background peak are governed by the same template metric. This allows us to derive an explicit asymptotic relation. We then follow the problem away from the strong-signal and high-threshold limits. Separating the signal-associated maximum from the best competing maximum gives an exact decomposition of the global bias into a local profiling contribution and a contribution from remote-peak competition. In a one-dimensional Gaussian example, the second factorial cumulant accounts for most of this correction, while the third brings the prediction into close agreement with simulation. A two-point Kac--Rice calculation reproduces the second cumulant and reveals a quartic short-distance suppression of nearby maxima. The resulting picture separates the roles of local dimension, model-dependent curvature, and global extremal competition within a common framework.
Related
- Local geometry of the Fermi surface and its effect on the electronic characteristics of normal metals
- Local Anticoncentration for Gaussian Boson Sampling via Conditional Wishart Geometry
- The Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess and the Look-Elsewhere Effect
- Recursive Operator Localization and Spectral Gap Descent via the Geometry of Local Spectral Expansion
- Local pair correlations and network geometry govern collective oscillations in nonreciprocal Ising networks
BibTeX
@misc{dorigo2026greedy,
title = {{The Greedy Bump Bias: Local Profiling Geometry and the Look-Elsewhere Effect}},
author = {Tommaso Dorigo},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.03581},
eprint = {2609.03581},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03581},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - The Greedy Bump Bias: Local Profiling Geometry and the Look-Elsewhere Effect
AU - Tommaso Dorigo
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/03
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.03581
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03581
AB - When fitting a localized signal whose position or shape is not known in advance, one typically allows these parameters to vary together with the signal amplitude and chooses the values that maximize the likelihood. This freedom has two related statistical consequences. If a genuine signal is present, its fitted amplitude will be affected by a positive bias; otherwise, the same freedom increases the chance of finding an unusually signal-like background fluctuation, giving rise to the look-elsewhere effect. We show that these two effects can be understood as consequences of the same local geometry of the family of signal templates. We study this connection in a Gaussian matched-filter model, where a smooth D-dimensional family of normalized templates describes the unknown signal location or shape. In the normalized matched-filter problem, the curvature of a genuine signal peak and the fluctuations that determine the curvature of a high background peak are governed by the same template metric. This allows us to derive an explicit asymptotic relation. We then follow the problem away from the strong-signal and high-threshold limits. Separating the signal-associated maximum from the best competing maximum gives an exact decomposition of the global bias into a local profiling contribution and a contribution from remote-peak competition. In a one-dimensional Gaussian example, the second factorial cumulant accounts for most of this correction, while the third brings the prediction into close agreement with simulation. A two-point Kac--Rice calculation reproduces the second cumulant and reveals a quartic short-distance suppression of nearby maxima. The resulting picture separates the roles of local dimension, model-dependent curvature, and global extremal competition within a common framework.
ER -