Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,332 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
Peer-reviewedCC BYRSC advances

Evaluating carbon affinity in catalytic methane decomposition using UBI-QEP energetics and DFT carbon-binding analysis.

  1. 1Department of Metallurgical and Chemical Engineering, Istanbul Technical University Istanbul 34469 Turkey [email protected].
  2. 2Faculty of Science, Koc University Istanbul Turkey.

Abstract

Catalytic methane decomposition produces hydrogen and solid carbon, but carbon growth does not necessarily cause catalyst deactivation. This study examines the usefulness and limitations of carbon affinity as a descriptor using UBI-QEP energetics for Fe, Ni, Pt and Cu, supported by published density functional theory (DFT) and experimental evidence. The methane-to-adsorbed-carbon enthalpy, D C, correlates strongly with the carbon chemisorption energy (r = -0.994) and almost exactly with the combined carbon and hydrogen binding term, Q(C) + 4Q(H). These relationships reveal its algebraic dependence on the underlying adsorption energies, rather than establishing an independent descriptor. Closing the thermochemical cycle to gaseous H₂ eliminates the hydrogen-binding contribution and clarifies the physical meaning of the chosen endpoint. An internally consistent DFT dataset covering 14 transition metals provides an external energetic comparison of carbon-binding order. For the four core metals, carbon-binding magnitudes show strong correlation (r = 0.929), although the Ni-Pt ordering is reversed. Facet-dependent adsorption, carbon migration barriers and experimental comparisons further demonstrate why elemental carbon affinity alone cannot predict activity or catalyst lifetime. Neither the DFT energetic comparison nor the heterogeneous experimental contrasts constitute validation of an out-of-sample model for catalytic activity or catalyst lifetime. Graphite-referenced equilibrium calculations quantify temperature and pressure effects without assuming quasi-equilibrium among the adsorbed CH x intermediates. The analysis retains D C as a transparent semi-empirical reaction-energy index while identifying carbon transport, nucleation and catalyst-state evolution as essential to interpreting filament growth, encapsulation and sustained hydrogen production.

Related

  1. Nonequilibrium Electronic Response Modes Govern Catalytic Energetics under Illumination
    Mengru Li, Hao Wang, Hui Yin
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  2. Thermo-photo catalytic partial oxidation of methane on hematite nanosheets functionalized with silver nanoparticles
    Jake Heinlein, Aislinn Whalen, Gaukhar Alzhanova +7
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textCatalysisChemRxiv
  3. Synthesis of Atomically Precise Pt1Ag34 Bimetallic Nanoclusters and Their Catalytic Performance in the Thermal Decomposition of Ammonium Perchlorate
    Manman Zhou, Nengmei Deng, Jun Zhao +1
    ACS OmegaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersCrossrefDOAJ
  4. Programmable Formic Acid Decomposition in Flow on an Interdigitated Internal Catalytic Condenser Beyond the Sabatier Limit
    Benjamin Auer, Chaehoon Kim, Wonwoo Lee +8
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  5. EVALUATING MOLECULAR DYNAMICS FRAMES FOR BINDING AFFINITY PREDICTION AND VIRTUAL SCREENING
    Jakub Poziemski, Pawel Siedlecki
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
BibTeX
@article{sorkhe2026evaluating,
  title = {{Evaluating carbon affinity in catalytic methane decomposition using UBI-QEP energetics and DFT carbon-binding analysis.}},
  author = {Yahya Sorkhe},
  journal = {RSC advances},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1039/d6ra05232k},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903430},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluating carbon affinity in catalytic methane decomposition using UBI-QEP energetics and DFT carbon-binding analysis.
AU  - Yahya Sorkhe
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - RSC advances
DO  - 10.1039/d6ra05232k
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903430
AB  - Catalytic methane decomposition produces hydrogen and solid carbon, but carbon growth does not necessarily cause catalyst deactivation. This study examines the usefulness and limitations of carbon affinity as a descriptor using UBI-QEP energetics for Fe, Ni, Pt and Cu, supported by published density functional theory (DFT) and experimental evidence. The methane-to-adsorbed-carbon enthalpy, D C, correlates strongly with the carbon chemisorption energy (r = -0.994) and almost exactly with the combined carbon and hydrogen binding term, Q(C) + 4Q(H). These relationships reveal its algebraic dependence on the underlying adsorption energies, rather than establishing an independent descriptor. Closing the thermochemical cycle to gaseous H₂ eliminates the hydrogen-binding contribution and clarifies the physical meaning of the chosen endpoint. An internally consistent DFT dataset covering 14 transition metals provides an external energetic comparison of carbon-binding order. For the four core metals, carbon-binding magnitudes show strong correlation (r = 0.929), although the Ni-Pt ordering is reversed. Facet-dependent adsorption, carbon migration barriers and experimental comparisons further demonstrate why elemental carbon affinity alone cannot predict activity or catalyst lifetime. Neither the DFT energetic comparison nor the heterogeneous experimental contrasts constitute validation of an out-of-sample model for catalytic activity or catalyst lifetime. Graphite-referenced equilibrium calculations quantify temperature and pressure effects without assuming quasi-equilibrium among the adsorbed CH x intermediates. The analysis retains D C as a transparent semi-empirical reaction-energy index while identifying carbon transport, nucleation and catalyst-state evolution as essential to interpreting filament growth, encapsulation and sustained hydrogen production.
SN  - 2046-2069
ER  -