Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,544 studies31 sourcesUpdated 58 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

A theory of noisy linear recurrent neural network learning dynamics

Abstract

Biological neural networks are noisy: their dynamics involve difficult-to-predict fluctuations which are likely due not just to chaos, but also to a variety of low-level biophysical processes. Despite the omnipresence of intrinsic noise, its theoretical consequences are incompletely understood, especially in the context of learning. For example, does noise meaningfully shape representation learning, or is it better viewed as a nuisance factor whose presence or absence changes little about what solution is found and when? Here, we argue that intrinsic noise can significantly modulate representation learning in recurrent neural networks (RNNs), since it can strongly break solution-space degeneracies and in some cases control whether a non-degenerate solution exists at all. We show that this is true for an analytically tractable model of noisy RNN learning with a linear activation function and white noise inputs. We find that, in the so-called rich regime (where weights are initialized with small values), noise strongly modulates the directions in which the read-in, readout, and recurrent weights align. Moreover, we find that noise produces a kind of phase transition: for sufficiently high noise, a non-degenerate solution is not even optimal if parameter scales are limited (e.g., via regularization). These results extend recent analytic work on RNN representation learning and show that noise can act as a fundamental determinant of representations.

Related

  1. A piece-wise linear recurrent neural network identifies generalizable dynamics from neural activity during decision-making in rodents
    W. H. Barnett, D. Durstewitz, A. Kuznetsov +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  2. A molecularly defined recurrent CA3 circuit regulates network dynamics and spatial working memory
    W. Cui, H. Li, W. Guo +4
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  3. Recurrent network dynamics explain the time course of perceptual grouping in natural scenes
    Sami Mollard, Alekh K. Ashok, Lore Goetschalckx +4
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textNeurosciencearXiv
  4. Planning as Dynamics Relaxation: Hippocampal Recurrent Network Realizes Optimal Goal-Directed Navigation
    Yuhang He, Junfeng Zuo, Tianhao Chu +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textNeurosciencearXiv
  5. When do hybrid models help? Combining mechanistic modelling and machine learning to predict gene regulatory network dynamics
    B. Noordijk, T. v. Loo, M. v. Hoek +6
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{vastola2026theory,
  title = {{A theory of noisy linear recurrent neural network learning dynamics}},
  author = {John J. Vastola and Kanaka Rajan},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.35785},
  eprint = {2610.35785},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35785},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A theory of noisy linear recurrent neural network learning dynamics
AU  - John J. Vastola
AU  - Kanaka Rajan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.35785
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35785
AB  - Biological neural networks are noisy: their dynamics involve difficult-to-predict fluctuations which are likely due not just to chaos, but also to a variety of low-level biophysical processes. Despite the omnipresence of intrinsic noise, its theoretical consequences are incompletely understood, especially in the context of learning. For example, does noise meaningfully shape representation learning, or is it better viewed as a nuisance factor whose presence or absence changes little about what solution is found and when? Here, we argue that intrinsic noise can significantly modulate representation learning in recurrent neural networks (RNNs), since it can strongly break solution-space degeneracies and in some cases control whether a non-degenerate solution exists at all. We show that this is true for an analytically tractable model of noisy RNN learning with a linear activation function and white noise inputs. We find that, in the so-called rich regime (where weights are initialized with small values), noise strongly modulates the directions in which the read-in, readout, and recurrent weights align. Moreover, we find that noise produces a kind of phase transition: for sufficiently high noise, a non-degenerate solution is not even optimal if parameter scales are limited (e.g., via regularization). These results extend recent analytic work on RNN representation learning and show that noise can act as a fundamental determinant of representations.
ER  -