Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,787 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYDiseases (Basel, Switzerland)

Exploratory Identification of Potential Serum Biomarkers Associated with Relapse in Multiple Myeloma.

6 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Pathology, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
  2. 2Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
  3. 3Proteomics Research Laboratory, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand.
  4. 4Graduate Program in Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Thammasat University, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand.
  5. 5Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Pathumthani University, Pathumthani 12000, Thailand.
  6. 6Department of Pharmacology, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.

Abstract

Background: Relapse remains a major clinical challenge in multiple myeloma (MM), highlighting the need to identify circulating proteins associated with relapse as candidates for disease monitoring and further biomarker development. Methods: An integrated proteomic and transcriptomic approach was used to identify candidate biomarkers associated with relapsed MM. Differentially abundant proteins were identified by LC-MS/MS profiling of paired serum samples collected at very good partial response (≥VGPR) and at relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) diagnosis. A publicly available gene expression dataset (GSE47552) comparing malignant and normal plasma cells was analyzed to assess gene-protein concordance. Candidate biomarkers were subsequently evaluated by ELISA using paired serum samples from 40 patients collected at ≥VGPR and relapse. Associations with bone marrow plasma cell (BMPC) burden and CD30 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) were further explored. Results: LC-MS/MS profiling identified 938 proteins, including 84 increased and 39 decreased in RRMM compared with ≥VGPR. Based on predefined selection criteria, TNFRSF8 (CD30) and PTBP2 were prioritized as candidate biomarkers. Serum TNFRSF8 levels were significantly higher at relapse than at ≥VGPR (p < 0.001), whereas PTBP2 levels showed no significant change (p = 0.578). Serum TNFRSF8 levels were not associated with BMPC burden, and CD30 was absent on plasma cells by IHC, suggesting an increase independent of plasma cell expansion. Conclusions: This exploratory study identified serum TNFRSF8 as a candidate circulating biomarker associated with relapse in MM. Further mechanistic and clinical studies in larger, well-characterized prospective cohorts are warranted to clarify its biological basis and potential clinical relevance.

Related

  1. Prognostic value of multiple biomarkers for kidney function decline in type 2 diabetes with relatively preserved kidney function: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis
    Jie Hu, Xinyu Pan, Shuwu Wei +1
    Frontiers in EndocrinologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEndocrinology & metabolismPMCCrossrefEurope PMC
  2. Identification of genes associated with a macrophage polarization-related transcriptional signature as biomarkers for tendinopathy based on bioinformatics analysis
    Ling Ren, Chengqi He, Yuxi Qin
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
  3. Identification of candidate selenium-associated transcriptomic biomarkers in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an integrated bioinformatics and expression validation study
    Yang Li, Zhuxiu Jiang, Zhibo Xu +3
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Identification and validation of T cell proliferation-associated transcriptomic biomarkers in ischemic stroke
    Jie Zhou, Ya qiang Nan, Xu dong Wang +4
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossref
  5. Identification of hepatitis B virus-associated membrane proteins as prognostic biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma based on retrospective analysis of integrated membrane proteomics
    Zichen Liu, Jiaming Wan, Guoli Deng +5
    Translational cancer researchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{chantkran2026exploratory,
  title = {{Exploratory Identification of Potential Serum Biomarkers Associated with Relapse in Multiple Myeloma.}},
  author = {Wittawat Chantkran and Chonlada Laoruangroj and Sittiruk Roytrakul and Oytip Nathalang and Pasra Arnutti and Janeyuth Chaisakul and Dollapak Apipongrat},
  journal = {Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/diseases14100380},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930007},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Exploratory Identification of Potential Serum Biomarkers Associated with Relapse in Multiple Myeloma.
AU  - Wittawat Chantkran
AU  - Chonlada Laoruangroj
AU  - Sittiruk Roytrakul
AU  - Oytip Nathalang
AU  - Pasra Arnutti
AU  - Janeyuth Chaisakul
AU  - Dollapak Apipongrat
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
JO  - Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)
DO  - 10.3390/diseases14100380
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930007
AB  - Background: Relapse remains a major clinical challenge in multiple myeloma (MM), highlighting the need to identify circulating proteins associated with relapse as candidates for disease monitoring and further biomarker development. Methods: An integrated proteomic and transcriptomic approach was used to identify candidate biomarkers associated with relapsed MM. Differentially abundant proteins were identified by LC-MS/MS profiling of paired serum samples collected at very good partial response (≥VGPR) and at relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) diagnosis. A publicly available gene expression dataset (GSE47552) comparing malignant and normal plasma cells was analyzed to assess gene-protein concordance. Candidate biomarkers were subsequently evaluated by ELISA using paired serum samples from 40 patients collected at ≥VGPR and relapse. Associations with bone marrow plasma cell (BMPC) burden and CD30 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) were further explored. Results: LC-MS/MS profiling identified 938 proteins, including 84 increased and 39 decreased in RRMM compared with ≥VGPR. Based on predefined selection criteria, TNFRSF8 (CD30) and PTBP2 were prioritized as candidate biomarkers. Serum TNFRSF8 levels were significantly higher at relapse than at ≥VGPR (p < 0.001), whereas PTBP2 levels showed no significant change (p = 0.578). Serum TNFRSF8 levels were not associated with BMPC burden, and CD30 was absent on plasma cells by IHC, suggesting an increase independent of plasma cell expansion. Conclusions: This exploratory study identified serum TNFRSF8 as a candidate circulating biomarker associated with relapse in MM. Further mechanistic and clinical studies in larger, well-characterized prospective cohorts are warranted to clarify its biological basis and potential clinical relevance.
SN  - 2079-9721
ER  -