Healthcare experiences of LGBTQ+ young people: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Abstract
Background: LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer and other sexual or gender diverse) young people experience marked health disparities, yet structural mechanisms through which healthcare systems produce them have not been systematically examined across LGBTQ+ identities, healthcare contexts, and geographies.
Methods: This qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) applied three-stage thematic synthesis to 30 qualitative studies (2019–2025) from Australia, the United States, Canada, and Sweden, examining how LGBTQ+ people aged 25 years or younger describe their healthcare experiences. Line-by-line coding by four reviewers was validated through team review and community consultation with LGBTQ+ young people in rural Western Victoria, Australia.
Results: Five analytical themes resulted. The ‘precondition tax’ identifies the invisible labour young people perform before care can begin, including assessing provider safety, managing disclosure, and educating clinicians. The ‘lottery of encounter’ shows provider competency is unpredictable in the absence of system-wide LGBTQ+ clinical standards. ‘Compounded erasure’ shows that systems that address only one identity category at a time fail intersectional patients multiplicatively, as each additional marginalised identity narrows the pool of adequate providers. ‘Geography as an amplifier’ reveals that rural location intensifies every preceding mechanism. ‘Communities as counter infrastructure’ documents the parallel system LGBTQ+ young people build for each other through referral, education, accompaniment, crisis support, and identity affirmation, performing functions the formal system has not.
Conclusions: Healthcare failure for LGBTQ+ young people is not incidental but structural, patterned, and preventable. The mechanisms are amenable to change through mandatory competency standards, intersectional service design, equitable geographic distribution of specialist services, and institutional accountability. Community infrastructure compensating for these failures should be resourced and protected, not co-opted as a substitute for structural reform.
Open Science Framework Registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7S8CZ .
PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD420251129560.
Related
- Family caregivers' experiences with mHealth and related digital health support for people living with dementia: a qualitative evidence synthesis using JBI meta-aggregation.
- The complexities and contradictions of online eating disorder content: A qualitative evidence synthesis of young people’s views and experiences
- “The way I am being treated matters more to me than the TB itself”: experiences of stigma in healthcare settings among people with drug-resistant tuberculosis in Lagos, Nigeria: a qualitative study
- Lived Experiences of Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction for People With Multiple Sclerosis and Their Providers: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis
- Experiences and perceptions of weight change among people living with HIV receiving antiretroviral therapy: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis
BibTeX
@article{oshea2026healthcare,
title = {{Healthcare experiences of LGBTQ+ young people: a qualitative evidence synthesis}},
author = {Amie O’Shea and James J Lucas and Jennifer David and Priscilla Dunk-West and Katharina M Engel and Bridget Hoban and Wenn Lawson and Mallory E Ledger and Stella Schneckenburger and Merrin Wake and Jordan Hunter and Sebastian Trew},
journal = {BMC Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-29517-0},
url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12889-026-29517-0},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Healthcare experiences of LGBTQ+ young people: a qualitative evidence synthesis
AU - Amie O’Shea
AU - James J Lucas
AU - Jennifer David
AU - Priscilla Dunk-West
AU - Katharina M Engel
AU - Bridget Hoban
AU - Wenn Lawson
AU - Mallory E Ledger
AU - Stella Schneckenburger
AU - Merrin Wake
AU - Jordan Hunter
AU - Sebastian Trew
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/30
JO - BMC Public Health
DO - 10.1186/s12889-026-29517-0
UR - https://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12889-026-29517-0
AB - Background: LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer and other sexual or gender diverse) young people experience marked health disparities, yet structural mechanisms through which healthcare systems produce them have not been systematically examined across LGBTQ+ identities, healthcare contexts, and geographies. Methods: This qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) applied three-stage thematic synthesis to 30 qualitative studies (2019–2025) from Australia, the United States, Canada, and Sweden, examining how LGBTQ+ people aged 25 years or younger describe their healthcare experiences. Line-by-line coding by four reviewers was validated through team review and community consultation with LGBTQ+ young people in rural Western Victoria, Australia. Results: Five analytical themes resulted. The ‘precondition tax’ identifies the invisible labour young people perform before care can begin, including assessing provider safety, managing disclosure, and educating clinicians. The ‘lottery of encounter’ shows provider competency is unpredictable in the absence of system-wide LGBTQ+ clinical standards. ‘Compounded erasure’ shows that systems that address only one identity category at a time fail intersectional patients multiplicatively, as each additional marginalised identity narrows the pool of adequate providers. ‘Geography as an amplifier’ reveals that rural location intensifies every preceding mechanism. ‘Communities as counter infrastructure’ documents the parallel system LGBTQ+ young people build for each other through referral, education, accompaniment, crisis support, and identity affirmation, performing functions the formal system has not. Conclusions: Healthcare failure for LGBTQ+ young people is not incidental but structural, patterned, and preventable. The mechanisms are amenable to change through mandatory competency standards, intersectional service design, equitable geographic distribution of specialist services, and institutional accountability. Community infrastructure compensating for these failures should be resourced and protected, not co-opted as a substitute for structural reform. Open Science Framework Registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7S8CZ . PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD420251129560.
SN - 1471-2458
ER -