Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Scientific Reports

Prevalence of 406 rare diseases by ethnicity and recorded COVID-19 infection rates among 62.5 million people in England

Abstract

Rare diseases (RD) are individually uncommon but collectively affect millions of people. Yet national estimates of their prevalence, especially across ethnic groups, are limited, and how the COVID-19 pandemic affected people with RD across ethnic groups is unknown. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of 406 RD by ethnicity, and to describe recorded COVID-19 infection across these RD and ethnic groups, in England. We conducted a cross-sectional study within the National Health Service (NHS) England Secure Data Environment, accessed via the British Heart Foundation (BHF) Data Science Centre’s CVD-COVID-UK/COVID-IMPACT Consortium, linking primary care, hospital, and mortality records for individuals alive on 31 July 2023. We calculated age- and sex-standardised prevalence for 406 RD, and recorded COVID-19 infection rates for the overall group, for each RD, and across the six-group Office for National Statistics (ONS) and 19-group NHS ethnicity classifications. Of 62.5 million people, 1.05 million (1.7%) had at least one of the 406 RD. Recorded COVID-19 infection was higher in the RD group than in the non-RD population (32.8% vs. 29.0%). Within the RD group, infection rates varied by ethnicity (e.g. 27.7% in the Pakistani and 23.8% in the Black African groups, versus 33.7% in the White British group) and by specific RD (24.6–41.2% among the 25 most common). Age- and sex-standardised prevalence also varied widely across ethnic groups, with substantial heterogeneity emerging only when broad categories were disaggregated into the more granular NHS classifications (for example, markedly elevated discoid lupus erythematosus prevalence in Black Caribbean but not Black African individuals, obscured within the aggregate “Black” category). This national, ethnicity-resolved map shows that rare-disease prevalence varies substantially across ethnic groups, with differences largely hidden within broad categories, and that recorded COVID-19 infection among people with RD varied across ethnic groups, with the highest rates observed in the ONS White and NHS White British groups. These findings provide a baseline to support earlier, fairer diagnosis and more targeted care.

Related

  1. Prevalence of Triglyceride–Glucose Index-Defined Insulin Resistance and Its Association with Recorded Cardiovascular Disease Among Adults in the Municipality of Naples: A Cross-Sectional Primary-Care Study
    Serafino Fazio, Vincenzo Santagada, Gaetano Piccinocchi +7
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Endocrinology & metabolismCrossref
  2. Prevalence of Rare Diseases in Consanguineous Marriages: A Case of Ullrich Muscular Dystrophy in a Resource‐Limited Setting
    Kanza Farhan, Muhammad Burhan Tariq, Amna Farhan +3
    Clinical case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Hospital-treated infectious diseases, infection burden, and subsequent risk of demyelinating diseases: a prospective cohort study
    Q. Chen, Y. Shen, Y. Chen +1
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurologymedRxiv
  4. Association between herpes simplex virus infection and cardiometabolic diseases: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Alexandra Adjakie Debrah, Oksana Ryabinina, Nicholas Ekow Thomford +5
    BMJ openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  5. Prevalence and predictors of HIV/TB co-infection in Sub-Saharan Africa
    Abubaker Ibrahim Elbur, Sindhuri Gandla, Raja Nakka +2
    Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseasesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{gu2026prevalence,
  title = {{Prevalence of 406 rare diseases by ethnicity and recorded COVID-19 infection rates among 62.5 million people in England}},
  author = {Qingze Gu and Seyed Alireza Hasheminasab and Marta Pineda-Moncusí and Chimweta Chilala and Johan H. Thygesen and Honghan Wu and Sara Khalid and CVD-COVID-UK/COVID-IMPACT Consortium and Amy Coombe},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-70531-4},
  url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-70531-4},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Prevalence of 406 rare diseases by ethnicity and recorded COVID-19 infection rates among 62.5 million people in England
AU  - Qingze Gu
AU  - Seyed Alireza Hasheminasab
AU  - Marta Pineda-Moncusí
AU  - Chimweta Chilala
AU  - Johan H. Thygesen
AU  - Honghan Wu
AU  - Sara Khalid
AU  - CVD-COVID-UK/COVID-IMPACT Consortium
AU  - Amy Coombe
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/18
JO  - Scientific Reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-026-70531-4
UR  - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-70531-4
AB  - Rare diseases (RD) are individually uncommon but collectively affect millions of people. Yet national estimates of their prevalence, especially across ethnic groups, are limited, and how the COVID-19 pandemic affected people with RD across ethnic groups is unknown. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of 406 RD by ethnicity, and to describe recorded COVID-19 infection across these RD and ethnic groups, in England. We conducted a cross-sectional study within the National Health Service (NHS) England Secure Data Environment, accessed via the British Heart Foundation (BHF) Data Science Centre’s CVD-COVID-UK/COVID-IMPACT Consortium, linking primary care, hospital, and mortality records for individuals alive on 31 July 2023. We calculated age- and sex-standardised prevalence for 406 RD, and recorded COVID-19 infection rates for the overall group, for each RD, and across the six-group Office for National Statistics (ONS) and 19-group NHS ethnicity classifications. Of 62.5 million people, 1.05 million (1.7%) had at least one of the 406 RD. Recorded COVID-19 infection was higher in the RD group than in the non-RD population (32.8% vs. 29.0%). Within the RD group, infection rates varied by ethnicity (e.g. 27.7% in the Pakistani and 23.8% in the Black African groups, versus 33.7% in the White British group) and by specific RD (24.6–41.2% among the 25 most common). Age- and sex-standardised prevalence also varied widely across ethnic groups, with substantial heterogeneity emerging only when broad categories were disaggregated into the more granular NHS classifications (for example, markedly elevated discoid lupus erythematosus prevalence in Black Caribbean but not Black African individuals, obscured within the aggregate “Black” category). This national, ethnicity-resolved map shows that rare-disease prevalence varies substantially across ethnic groups, with differences largely hidden within broad categories, and that recorded COVID-19 infection among people with RD varied across ethnic groups, with the highest rates observed in the ONS White and NHS White British groups. These findings provide a baseline to support earlier, fairer diagnosis and more targeted care.
SN  - 2045-2322
ER  -