Perinatal mental health care: a multicountry comparison of migrant and non-migrant populations
Abstract
Background: Perinatal mental health (PMH) problems affect approximately one in five women and are associated with adverse maternal and child outcomes. Although guidelines recommend universal screening, inequities persist, particularly among migrant populations. Evidence remains limited, constraining the development of effective policy responses. This study, using data from the IMAgiNE Research Network, aimed to analyse: the association between migrant status and the provision of PMH care (i.e., screening and support) in women, and the association between migration status and emotional difficulties during the perinatal period and childbirth experience.
Methods: We analysed cross-sectional data from the IMAgiNE study across eight European countries. Outcomes included emotional difficulties, screening coverage, perceived adequacy of support among those in need, and childbirth experience. Country-specific odds ratios were estimated, and pooled estimates were calculated.
Results: Sample size varied by outcome (17,723 for support adequacy; 41,224 for others). Migrant women had higher odds of reporting emotional difficulties (pooled OR = 1.12, p = 0.023), with the highest odds in Norway (OR = 1.38, p = 0.004). Among those in need, they had lower odds of receiving adequate support (pooled OR = 0.82, p = 0.013). They also had higher odds of reporting a negative childbirth experience (pooled OR = 1.18, p < 0.001), with the strongest association in Italy (OR = 1.23, p = 0.003). No association was observed for screening. Results varied across countries.
Conclusions: Migrant women show a higher burden of emotional difficulties but a lower likelihood of receiving adequate support, with no corresponding increase in screening. This mismatch suggests a failure in translating detection into effective care, highlighting systemic gaps in the responsiveness of PMH services, particularly for migrant populations, and the need for culturally competent care.
Related
- Interventions facilitating access to perinatal care for migrant women without medical insurance: a scoping review
- Assets and health across the lifecourse: a framework for supporting migrant populations.
- Differences in physical and mental health outcomes by occupational type among chinese migrant workers in guinea: a cross-sectional survey
- Effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and implementation of WHO psychological interventions for migrant populations resettled in Italy: study protocol for the ADVANCE hybrid type-I randomized controlled trial
- Malaria among migrant populations in the Greater Mekong Subregion: a scoping review of evidence and implications for malaria elimination.
BibTeX
@article{meireles2026perinatal,
title = {{Perinatal mental health care: a multicountry comparison of migrant and non-migrant populations}},
author = {A Meireles and R Costa and J Oliveira and TM Pinto and S Marques and LG Cora and M Verdecchia and M Camanni and I Mariani and M Lazzerini},
journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.106},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.106},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Perinatal mental health care: a multicountry comparison of migrant and non-migrant populations
AU - A Meireles
AU - R Costa
AU - J Oliveira
AU - TM Pinto
AU - S Marques
AU - LG Cora
AU - M Verdecchia
AU - M Camanni
AU - I Mariani
AU - M Lazzerini
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - The European Journal of Public Health
DO - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.106
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.106
AB - Background: Perinatal mental health (PMH) problems affect approximately one in five women and are associated with adverse maternal and child outcomes. Although guidelines recommend universal screening, inequities persist, particularly among migrant populations. Evidence remains limited, constraining the development of effective policy responses. This study, using data from the IMAgiNE Research Network, aimed to analyse: the association between migrant status and the provision of PMH care (i.e., screening and support) in women, and the association between migration status and emotional difficulties during the perinatal period and childbirth experience. Methods: We analysed cross-sectional data from the IMAgiNE study across eight European countries. Outcomes included emotional difficulties, screening coverage, perceived adequacy of support among those in need, and childbirth experience. Country-specific odds ratios were estimated, and pooled estimates were calculated. Results: Sample size varied by outcome (17,723 for support adequacy; 41,224 for others). Migrant women had higher odds of reporting emotional difficulties (pooled OR = 1.12, p = 0.023), with the highest odds in Norway (OR = 1.38, p = 0.004). Among those in need, they had lower odds of receiving adequate support (pooled OR = 0.82, p = 0.013). They also had higher odds of reporting a negative childbirth experience (pooled OR = 1.18, p < 0.001), with the strongest association in Italy (OR = 1.23, p = 0.003). No association was observed for screening. Results varied across countries. Conclusions: Migrant women show a higher burden of emotional difficulties but a lower likelihood of receiving adequate support, with no corresponding increase in screening. This mismatch suggests a failure in translating detection into effective care, highlighting systemic gaps in the responsiveness of PMH services, particularly for migrant populations, and the need for culturally competent care.
SN - 1101-1262
SN - 1464-360X
ER -