Nucleation at the GST--oxide interface and beam-driven ordering in amorphous Ge--Sb--Te: HAADF, EDS and electron pair distribution functions across a 4D-STEM dose series
Abstract
Where crystal nuclei form in amorphous phase-change materials decides how they switch. We study six successive 4D-STEM scans, with simultaneous HAADF and EDS data, of a magnetron-sputtered Ge-Sb-Te (GST) film, restricted to the GST layer and its interface with the oxide beneath it. Nucleation sites do not differ in composition or number density: the nuclei lie on the same robust HAADF-EDS relation as the matrix, and at fixed HAADF the spread of the summed EDS signal equals its Poisson counting noise (ratio 1.03 +- 0.05). The nuclei are nevertheless crystalline and stand out in the 4D-STEM max-intensity virtual image (median z = 11.0) but not in HAADF (z = 1.3) or EDS (z = 0.3). We classify the film in four ways (HAADF intensity, I(q) phase mapping, PCA of the whole diffraction patterns and a self-supervised SimCLR encoder) and compare the electron pair distribution functions (PDFs) of all classes after calibrating reciprocal space on the Au cap. All bulk classes share one short-range structure (first shell 2.70-2.74 Å); towards the interface the first sharp diffraction peak (FSDP) moves to lower q, and every method isolates a thin interface-edge environment with a shorter or missing first shell. The I(q) classification isolates, in every scan, an interface environment that holds 62-100% of the nucleus pixels (1.2-2.5-fold above depth) and persists when the nucleus pixels are removed before classification. The interface, rather than a distinct composition or density of the nucleating volume, therefore marks where nuclei form. Over 4.7e3 e/Å^2 the HAADF signal falls by 17%, the first shell shortens by 0.03 Å and the FSDP narrows by 9%, apparently ordering the film as it damages it. All analyses used PySTEMLab, an interactive 4D-STEM analysis environment developed for this work.
Related
- Results of Classical and Nonclassical theories of nucleation for ordering transition in barium titanate
- Interplay of spin-lattice and electronic coupling far above Neel ordering in 2D antiferromagnetic CrPS4 and its interface manifestation
- Unconditional authentication in quantum key distribution via hybrid entangled physical unclonable functions
- Resolving Local Structure of Distribution Functions in Collider Measurements
- Parton distribution functions and strong coupling constant: MSHT
BibTeX
@misc{kumar2026nucleation,
title = {{Nucleation at the GST--oxide interface and beam-driven ordering in amorphous Ge--Sb--Te: HAADF, EDS and electron pair distribution functions across a 4D-STEM dose series}},
author = {Mridul Kumar and Kirill Sobolev and Alexander Upcher and Yevgeny Rakita},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.15196},
eprint = {2610.15196},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15196},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Nucleation at the GST--oxide interface and beam-driven ordering in amorphous Ge--Sb--Te: HAADF, EDS and electron pair distribution functions across a 4D-STEM dose series
AU - Mridul Kumar
AU - Kirill Sobolev
AU - Alexander Upcher
AU - Yevgeny Rakita
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/10
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.15196
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15196
AB - Where crystal nuclei form in amorphous phase-change materials decides how they switch. We study six successive 4D-STEM scans, with simultaneous HAADF and EDS data, of a magnetron-sputtered Ge-Sb-Te (GST) film, restricted to the GST layer and its interface with the oxide beneath it. Nucleation sites do not differ in composition or number density: the nuclei lie on the same robust HAADF-EDS relation as the matrix, and at fixed HAADF the spread of the summed EDS signal equals its Poisson counting noise (ratio 1.03 +- 0.05). The nuclei are nevertheless crystalline and stand out in the 4D-STEM max-intensity virtual image (median z = 11.0) but not in HAADF (z = 1.3) or EDS (z = 0.3). We classify the film in four ways (HAADF intensity, I(q) phase mapping, PCA of the whole diffraction patterns and a self-supervised SimCLR encoder) and compare the electron pair distribution functions (PDFs) of all classes after calibrating reciprocal space on the Au cap. All bulk classes share one short-range structure (first shell 2.70-2.74 Å); towards the interface the first sharp diffraction peak (FSDP) moves to lower q, and every method isolates a thin interface-edge environment with a shorter or missing first shell. The I(q) classification isolates, in every scan, an interface environment that holds 62-100% of the nucleus pixels (1.2-2.5-fold above depth) and persists when the nucleus pixels are removed before classification. The interface, rather than a distinct composition or density of the nucleating volume, therefore marks where nuclei form. Over 4.7e3 e/Å^2 the HAADF signal falls by 17%, the first shell shortens by 0.03 Å and the FSDP narrows by 9%, apparently ordering the film as it damages it. All analyses used PySTEMLab, an interactive 4D-STEM analysis environment developed for this work.
ER -