Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCmedRxiv

Exploring Perspectives of Healthcare Staff on Achieving the Healthcare Quality Standards in District Hospitals in Rwanda: A qualitative Study

  1. 1University of Global Health Equity

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended that quality of care (QoC) should be timely delivered within safe conditions based on patient needs and preferences. However, low- and middle-income countries face challenges such as understaffing and inadequate infrastructure, resulting in poor QoC. In 2012, Rwanda leveraged the pre-existing performance-based financing (PBF) to introduce continuous quality improvement (QI) towards accreditation recognition of district hospitals (DH). Despite these efforts, no DHs accredited by 2022. Objective: To explore perspectives of healthcare professionals (HCP) on achieving the delivery of standard QoC in Rwandan DHs. Methods: Using an interpretative epistemology, this qualitative study conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 14 participants purposively sampled HCPs from Masaka (urban) and Remera-Rukoma (rural) DHs. Interview data were audio-recorded, manually transcribed, and analyzed with thematic content analysis. Results: The analysis revealed three main themes: perceptions about continuous QI towards accreditation recognition, barriers to achieving accreditation, and strategies to achieve the recognition. Participants from both hospitals expressed that the accreditation program required more efforts than the PBF approach. They also highlighted that the DHs were still at the awareness stage and had not clearly implemented the quality standards due to challenges such as low staff involvement and motivation, staff turnover and shortage, and limited budget for accreditation. Recommended strategies to achieve the recognition included staff motivation through increased incentives and salaries, cascaded accreditation rollout, and integrating accreditation program into pre-service curriculum. Conclusions: This qualitative study highlighted the challenges, such as limited budget and low staff motivation, impeding progress towards DH accreditation recognition. Cascaded accreditation rollout, enhanced staff incentives and salaries, and integration of accreditation program into pre-service curriculum were key strategies suggested for Rwanda Ministry of Health and DHs to achieve the required quality standards and recognition.

Related

  1. Exploring Medical Professionals’ Perspectives on Cannabinoid Use in Professional and Elite-Level Contact Sports: A Qualitative Inquiry
    Elizabeth S. Thompson, Jane Alcorn, Robert B. Laprairie +3
    Sports healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Exploring the barriers to prehabilitation integration in Austrian healthcare: a qualitative analysis
    Jan Markus Lutz, Mia Gisselbaek, Ana Beatriz Noronha +1
    BJA openPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Exploring the views of people experiencing homelessness regarding their health and housing support, and their perspectives on deteriorating health and end of life support: a qualitative analysis
    Samantha Dorney-Smith, Joel Barnett, Sarah Hough +7
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  4. Exploring caregivers’ perspectives and anticipated acceptance of hepatitis B birth-dose vaccination before the national introduction in Sierra Leone: a qualitative study
    Edwin Nabie Sesay, Michael Jones, Andrew Kekurah Kemoh +10
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  5. Accessibility of essential medicines and vaccines among fisherfolk, artisanal miners and pastoralists in Mainland Tanzania: a qualitative study of barriers and strategies from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and community leaders.
    Lawrencia D Mushi, Noel O Otieno
    BMJ openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{ntawukuriryayo2026exploring,
  title = {{Exploring Perspectives of Healthcare Staff on Achieving the Healthcare Quality Standards in District Hospitals in Rwanda: A qualitative Study}},
  author = {J. T. Ntawukuriryayo and G. Woolhead},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.11.07.26367515},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.07.26367515v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Exploring Perspectives of Healthcare Staff on Achieving the Healthcare Quality Standards in District Hospitals in Rwanda: A qualitative Study
AU  - J. T. Ntawukuriryayo
AU  - G. Woolhead
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/07
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.11.07.26367515
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.07.26367515v1
AB  - Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended that quality of care (QoC) should be timely delivered within safe conditions based on patient needs and preferences. However, low- and middle-income countries face challenges such as understaffing and inadequate infrastructure, resulting in poor QoC. In 2012, Rwanda leveraged the pre-existing performance-based financing (PBF) to introduce continuous quality improvement (QI) towards accreditation recognition of district hospitals (DH). Despite these efforts, no DHs accredited by 2022. Objective: To explore perspectives of healthcare professionals (HCP) on achieving the delivery of standard QoC in Rwandan DHs. Methods: Using an interpretative epistemology, this qualitative study conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 14 participants purposively sampled HCPs from Masaka (urban) and Remera-Rukoma (rural) DHs. Interview data were audio-recorded, manually transcribed, and analyzed with thematic content analysis. Results: The analysis revealed three main themes: perceptions about continuous QI towards accreditation recognition, barriers to achieving accreditation, and strategies to achieve the recognition. Participants from both hospitals expressed that the accreditation program required more efforts than the PBF approach. They also highlighted that the DHs were still at the awareness stage and had not clearly implemented the quality standards due to challenges such as low staff involvement and motivation, staff turnover and shortage, and limited budget for accreditation. Recommended strategies to achieve the recognition included staff motivation through increased incentives and salaries, cascaded accreditation rollout, and integrating accreditation program into pre-service curriculum. Conclusions: This qualitative study highlighted the challenges, such as limited budget and low staff motivation, impeding progress towards DH accreditation recognition. Cascaded accreditation rollout, enhanced staff incentives and salaries, and integration of accreditation program into pre-service curriculum were key strategies suggested for Rwanda Ministry of Health and DHs to achieve the required quality standards and recognition.
ER  -