Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

Developing and evaluating machine learning models in the prediction of recurrent sudden cardiac arrest

  1. 1Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology and the Heart and Vascular Institute at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
  2. 2School of Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh
  3. 3School of Nursing, University of Rochester

Abstract

Background: Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is a major killer of adults in the United States and has a significant recurrence rate. Predicting the risk of recurrent SCA has implications to patients’ counseling and management.

Objective: The goal of this study is to develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) models to predict recurrent SCA in this high-risk population.

Methods: Patients ( n = 5,286) whose index arrest was coded as a primary diagnosis were selected and followed to the endpoint of second SCA. The cohort was divided into training ( n = 3,382, 3.8% event rate), internal validation ( n = 846, 3.8% event rate), and holdout test (1,058, 3.8% event rate) sets. External validation was performed using a cohort of 1,776 patients (2.3% event rate). Multiple ML discriminators were tested using model area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, and F1 scores. The model with highest AUROC was evaluated on a holdout test set and was externally validated.

Results: The gradient boosting (GB) model outperformed other models with AUROC of 0.93 in the internal validation set. It also achieved high discrimination in the holdout (AUROC=0.92), and external validation (AUROC = 0.90, sensitivity = 0.92, specificity = 0.83, F1 score = 0.19) sets. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) demonstrated that a diagnostic code of shockable rhythm (ventricular tachycardia), evidence of structural heart disease, conduction abnormalities, and initial blood work results at the time of the index arrest were main contributors to model prediction. Low (NPV ≥ 99%), intermediate, and high (PPV≥25%) risk groups defined from the internal validation set were applied to the holdout and external validation sets with strong prediction of time to recurrent SCA ( p = 0.003).

Conclusion: Our ML prediction model demonstrates very good and stable discrimination in the prediction of recurrent SCA based on explainable clinical factors. External validation results confirm the generalizability of our findings. This model could support risk stratification and counseling for survivors of SCA.

Related

  1. Machine learning-based prediction models for recurrent stroke after an index stroke: a scoping review protocol
    Agus Purnama, Susaldi Susaldi, Irma Jayatmi +2
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossrefPMC
  2. Developing a Machine Learning–Based System for Nutrient Profiling of Pakistani Cuisine
    Alishba Umer Farooq, Fiza Khan, Huda Ijaz +5
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMC
  3. Teacher-student-machine interaction autonomous learning: a structured LLM-integrated framework for developing independent clinical reasoning in residency training.
    Pengru Wang, He Li, Dingyuan Tu +7
    BMC medical educationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  4. Human Skin Permeability Prediction by Machine Learning for Transdermal Drug Delivery
    Seunghwan Oh, So Hyun Ahn
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Machine learning-based prediction of clinical pregnancy in infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization
    Lin Zhang, Jinghe Cao, Qianqian Qin +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsCrossref
BibTeX
@article{gohel2026developing,
  title = {{Developing and evaluating machine learning models in the prediction of recurrent sudden cardiac arrest}},
  author = {Paulomi Gohel and Michael Daidone and Tanmay A. Gokhale and Nathan Riek and Floyd Thoma and Suresh Mulukutla and Seung J. Moon and Chinmay Patel and Sandeep K. Jain and Murat Akcakaya and Salah Al-Zaiti and Samir Saba},
  journal = {Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fcvm.2026.1883279},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1883279/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Developing and evaluating machine learning models in the prediction of recurrent sudden cardiac arrest
AU  - Paulomi Gohel
AU  - Michael Daidone
AU  - Tanmay A. Gokhale
AU  - Nathan Riek
AU  - Floyd Thoma
AU  - Suresh Mulukutla
AU  - Seung J. Moon
AU  - Chinmay Patel
AU  - Sandeep K. Jain
AU  - Murat Akcakaya
AU  - Salah Al-Zaiti
AU  - Samir Saba
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/14
JO  - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
DO  - 10.3389/fcvm.2026.1883279
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1883279/full
AB  - Background: Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is a major killer of adults in the United States and has a significant recurrence rate. Predicting the risk of recurrent SCA has implications to patients’ counseling and management.  Objective: The goal of this study is to develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) models to predict recurrent SCA in this high-risk population.  Methods: Patients ( n = 5,286) whose index arrest was coded as a primary diagnosis were selected and followed to the endpoint of second SCA. The cohort was divided into training ( n = 3,382, 3.8% event rate), internal validation ( n = 846, 3.8% event rate), and holdout test (1,058, 3.8% event rate) sets. External validation was performed using a cohort of 1,776 patients (2.3% event rate). Multiple ML discriminators were tested using model area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, and F1 scores. The model with highest AUROC was evaluated on a holdout test set and was externally validated.  Results: The gradient boosting (GB) model outperformed other models with AUROC of 0.93 in the internal validation set. It also achieved high discrimination in the holdout (AUROC=0.92), and external validation (AUROC = 0.90, sensitivity = 0.92, specificity = 0.83, F1 score = 0.19) sets. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) demonstrated that a diagnostic code of shockable rhythm (ventricular tachycardia), evidence of structural heart disease, conduction abnormalities, and initial blood work results at the time of the index arrest were main contributors to model prediction. Low (NPV ≥ 99%), intermediate, and high (PPV≥25%) risk groups defined from the internal validation set were applied to the holdout and external validation sets with strong prediction of time to recurrent SCA ( p = 0.003).  Conclusion: Our ML prediction model demonstrates very good and stable discrimination in the prediction of recurrent SCA based on explainable clinical factors. External validation results confirm the generalizability of our findings. This model could support risk stratification and counseling for survivors of SCA.
SN  - 2297-055X
ER  -