Integrated genomic analysis of tumor mutational burden reveals heterogeneous immunotherapy outcomes in head and neck cancer.
6 affiliations
- 1Department of Oncology, Xijing Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China.
- 2State Key Laboratory of Neurology and Oncology Drug Development, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Nanjing, 210042, China.
- 3Department of Medicine, Nanjing Simcere Medical Laboratory Science Co., Ltd, Nanjing, 210042, China.
- 4State Key Laboratory of Neurology and Oncology Drug Development, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Nanjing, 210042, China. [email protected].
- 5Department of Medicine, Nanjing Simcere Medical Laboratory Science Co., Ltd, Nanjing, 210042, China. [email protected].
- 6The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510630, China. [email protected].
Abstract
Background
Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a highly heterogeneous malignancy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the treatment landscape of head and neck cancer; however, substantial heterogeneity in clinical outcomes remains. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is widely reported in clinical sequencing assays; however, its standalone value in guiding the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains inconsistent, and its interpretation alongside co-occurring genomic alterations is not well defined in routine practice.Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 389 Chinese patients with HNC using a 551-gene targeted sequencing panel and validated key findings in the MSKCC ICI-treated cohort. Tumor mutational burden (TMB), copy number variation (CNV), tumor fusion burden (TFB), and germline variants were comprehensively profiled to identify molecular determinants of immunotherapy efficacy.Results
TMB-high (TMB-H, ≥ 10 mut/Mb) tumors accounted for 23% of cases and were enriched for mutations in TP53, NOTCH1, and PIK3CA, whereas TMB-low (TMB-L) tumors showed frequent CNVs, including CCND1, EGFR, and FGFR1 amplifications and CDKN2A loss. In the MSKCC cohort, integrating TMB with the mutation status of PIK3CA, TP53, NOTCH1, and FAT1 provided improved stratification of immunotherapy outcomes compared with TMB alone, highlighting the importance of genomic context when interpreting mutation burden. Additionally, higher tumor fusion burden (TFB) correlated with distinct chemosensitivity patterns, and germline variants in DNA repair genes were associated with increased somatic mutation accumulation.Conclusions
These findings demonstrate that immunotherapy outcomes in head and neck cancer are strongly influenced by the genomic context of tumor mutational burden. Integrated genomic analysis provides a biologically grounded framework for understanding heterogeneity in genomic-guided cancer treatment.
Related
- Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins depict a new predictive risk model for ovarian cancer prognosis and immunotherapy
- Circulating and tumor microenvironment immunomarkers associate with immunotherapy efficacy in advanced bladder urothelial carcinoma: an exploratory multicenter study integrating genomic and immunophenotypic profiling
- Robotic bronchoscopy in early lung cancer: a biomarker-driven platform for genomic profiling and immunotherapy-oriented decision-making.
- Integrated Genomic and Immune Profiling Reveals PIK3CA-Mutant HPV16-Positive Cervical Cancer as a Clinically Aggressive and Immunologically Distinct Subtype in Patients from Eastern India
- 445 Co-mutation architecture shapes immunotherapy outcomes in KRAS-mutant NSCLC: real-world evidence from AACR GENIE BPC cohort
BibTeX
@article{chen2026integrated,
title = {{Integrated genomic analysis of tumor mutational burden reveals heterogeneous immunotherapy outcomes in head and neck cancer.}},
author = {Yan Chen and Tiantian Han and Xiaotong Xi and Dongsheng Chen and Qin Zhang and Xing Zhang and Zixiong Lei},
journal = {BMC cancer},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1186/s12885-026-16012-3},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/43009817},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Integrated genomic analysis of tumor mutational burden reveals heterogeneous immunotherapy outcomes in head and neck cancer.
AU - Yan Chen
AU - Tiantian Han
AU - Xiaotong Xi
AU - Dongsheng Chen
AU - Qin Zhang
AU - Xing Zhang
AU - Zixiong Lei
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/12
JO - BMC cancer
DO - 10.1186/s12885-026-16012-3
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/43009817
AB - Background Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a highly heterogeneous malignancy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the treatment landscape of head and neck cancer; however, substantial heterogeneity in clinical outcomes remains. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is widely reported in clinical sequencing assays; however, its standalone value in guiding the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains inconsistent, and its interpretation alongside co-occurring genomic alterations is not well defined in routine practice.Methods We retrospectively analyzed 389 Chinese patients with HNC using a 551-gene targeted sequencing panel and validated key findings in the MSKCC ICI-treated cohort. Tumor mutational burden (TMB), copy number variation (CNV), tumor fusion burden (TFB), and germline variants were comprehensively profiled to identify molecular determinants of immunotherapy efficacy.Results TMB-high (TMB-H, ≥ 10 mut/Mb) tumors accounted for 23% of cases and were enriched for mutations in TP53, NOTCH1, and PIK3CA, whereas TMB-low (TMB-L) tumors showed frequent CNVs, including CCND1, EGFR, and FGFR1 amplifications and CDKN2A loss. In the MSKCC cohort, integrating TMB with the mutation status of PIK3CA, TP53, NOTCH1, and FAT1 provided improved stratification of immunotherapy outcomes compared with TMB alone, highlighting the importance of genomic context when interpreting mutation burden. Additionally, higher tumor fusion burden (TFB) correlated with distinct chemosensitivity patterns, and germline variants in DNA repair genes were associated with increased somatic mutation accumulation.Conclusions These findings demonstrate that immunotherapy outcomes in head and neck cancer are strongly influenced by the genomic context of tumor mutational burden. Integrated genomic analysis provides a biologically grounded framework for understanding heterogeneity in genomic-guided cancer treatment.
SN - 1471-2407
ER -