Laparoscopic approach for emergency colon resection: a retrospective propensity score-matched study
- 1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland
- 2Department of Orthopedics, Tampere University Hospital and Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- 3Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
Abstract
Background: Despite its routine use in elective procedures, the role of laparoscopy in emergency colorectal surgery remains debated due to limited evidence. This study compared laparoscopic and open surgery regarding complications, mortality, and hospital stay following emergency colon operations.
Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients treated at Päijät–Häme Central Hospital between 2010 and 2020 who underwent emergency colon resection. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for comorbidities, prior ICU admission, surgical indication, and contamination between laparoscopic and open surgery groups.
Results: All together 484 patients had an emergency colorectal resection of which 85 (17.6%) were carried out laparoscopically, 31 (6.4%) were converted and 377 (76.0%) were open. In the whole cohort, Comprehensive complication index was lower among laparoscopy patients than open surgery patients if intraoperative conversion to open surgery was avoided (25.8 vs. 34.9, p = 0.012). The subgroup analysis also showed lower CCI after laparoscopic resection for patients presented with obstruction (21.3 vs. 29.7, p = 0.046) or colorectal cancer (21.1 vs. 29.4, p = 0.020) A multivariable regression analysis also showed that starting the procedure laparoscopically predicted lower complication rates. Patients who had a laparoscopic resection also had shorter hospital stay (9.0 vs. 12.9 days, p < 0.001). Patients with open surgery had significantly more wound complications (10.3% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.010). Open surgery was also an independent risk factor for higher CCI (p = 0.008) and the need for intensive care (p = 0.027). Mortality was similar regardless of the approach in short term (30 days, p = 0.810; 90 days, p = 0.354) and in long-term survival (p = 0.466).
Conclusions: The laparoscopic technique in colorectal emergencies may offer similar benefits as in elective surgery, with a lower burden of total complications, less wound complications and shorter hospital stay. Laparoscopy was not associated with any unexpected harmful events.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-026-00721-y.
Related
- Impact of Laparoscopic Liver Resection on Long‐Term Outcomes and Non‐Liver‐Related Mortality in Elderly Patients With Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Propensity Score‐Matched Analysis
- Exploring alternative techniques for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with stapling first: the in situ method in a propensity score-matched retrospective study.
- Preoperative bladder artery embolization before transurethral resection of large bladder tumors: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.
- Short-term surgical outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.
- Postoperative C-Reactive Protein as a Marker of the Early Inflammatory Response in Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Endometrial Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
BibTeX
@article{lahtinen2026laparoscopic,
title = {{Laparoscopic approach for emergency colon resection: a retrospective propensity score-matched study}},
author = {Antti J. Lahtinen and Silja A. S. Salo and Viiko Vahtera and Marie T. Grönroos-Korhonen and Jyrki A. O. Kössi},
journal = {World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1186/s13017-026-00721-y},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-026-00721-y},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Laparoscopic approach for emergency colon resection: a retrospective propensity score-matched study
AU - Antti J. Lahtinen
AU - Silja A. S. Salo
AU - Viiko Vahtera
AU - Marie T. Grönroos-Korhonen
AU - Jyrki A. O. Kössi
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/10
JO - World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES
DO - 10.1186/s13017-026-00721-y
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-026-00721-y
AB - Background: Despite its routine use in elective procedures, the role of laparoscopy in emergency colorectal surgery remains debated due to limited evidence. This study compared laparoscopic and open surgery regarding complications, mortality, and hospital stay following emergency colon operations. Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients treated at Päijät–Häme Central Hospital between 2010 and 2020 who underwent emergency colon resection. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for comorbidities, prior ICU admission, surgical indication, and contamination between laparoscopic and open surgery groups. Results: All together 484 patients had an emergency colorectal resection of which 85 (17.6%) were carried out laparoscopically, 31 (6.4%) were converted and 377 (76.0%) were open. In the whole cohort, Comprehensive complication index was lower among laparoscopy patients than open surgery patients if intraoperative conversion to open surgery was avoided (25.8 vs. 34.9, p = 0.012). The subgroup analysis also showed lower CCI after laparoscopic resection for patients presented with obstruction (21.3 vs. 29.7, p = 0.046) or colorectal cancer (21.1 vs. 29.4, p = 0.020) A multivariable regression analysis also showed that starting the procedure laparoscopically predicted lower complication rates. Patients who had a laparoscopic resection also had shorter hospital stay (9.0 vs. 12.9 days, p < 0.001). Patients with open surgery had significantly more wound complications (10.3% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.010). Open surgery was also an independent risk factor for higher CCI (p = 0.008) and the need for intensive care (p = 0.027). Mortality was similar regardless of the approach in short term (30 days, p = 0.810; 90 days, p = 0.354) and in long-term survival (p = 0.466). Conclusions: The laparoscopic technique in colorectal emergencies may offer similar benefits as in elective surgery, with a lower burden of total complications, less wound complications and shorter hospital stay. Laparoscopy was not associated with any unexpected harmful events. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-026-00721-y.
SN - 1749-7922
ER -