Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 39 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

On a Non-Prox-Regularity Example by Rockafellar and Wets

Abstract

We analyze a counterexample concerning non-prox-regular functions provided by Rockafellar and Wets in their 1998 foundational monograph, \textit{Variational Analysis}. By establishing a general theorem on the continuity of set-valued mappings, we show that the counterexample does not have its intended properties. We propose a slight adjustment to the construction and prove that the corrected version serves as the desired counterexample.

Related

  1. A Rockafellar theorem for cyclically quasi-monotone maps: The regular non-vanishing case
    Luigi de Pascale, Paul Pegon
    Communications in Contemporary MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsHAL
  2. Failure of Rockafellar's Sum Conjecture via an Explicit Non-(FPV) Operator
    Radu Ioan Bot
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  3. The quasi-convex Rockafellar theorem
    Luigi de Pascale, Paul Pegon
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsOptimisation & controlHALarXiv
  4. Accelerated Prox-Level Methods for Unknown Piecewise-Smooth Optimization II: Function-constrained Optimization
    Zhenwei Lin, Zhe Zhang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Nonmaximal sums of maximally monotone operators under Rockafellar's constraint qualification
    Weifeng Yang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{jasper2026nonproxregularity,
  title = {{On a Non-Prox-Regularity Example by Rockafellar and Wets}},
  author = {Isaac Jasper and Xianfu Wang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.23279},
  eprint = {2609.23279},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23279},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - On a Non-Prox-Regularity Example by Rockafellar and Wets
AU  - Isaac Jasper
AU  - Xianfu Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/20
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.23279
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23279
AB  - We analyze a counterexample concerning non-prox-regular functions provided by Rockafellar and Wets in their 1998 foundational monograph, \textit{Variational Analysis}. By establishing a general theorem on the continuity of set-valued mappings, we show that the counterexample does not have its intended properties. We propose a slight adjustment to the construction and prove that the corrected version serves as the desired counterexample.
ER  -