Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 32 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of Hydrology

Improving flood forecasts: the combined impact of data assimilation and machine learning post-processing

Abstract

Accurate streamflow forecasts are essential for flood risk management and impact mitigation. Coupling hydrological models with machine learning techniques has gained increasing attention as a means to improve forecast skill, with post-processing emerging as a promising approach to correcting systematic model residuals. However, the interaction between machine-learning post-processing, data assimilation and calibration strategies remains insufficiently explored. In this study, we assess the contribution of machine-learning-based post-processing to hourly streamflow forecasts for 687 catchments in metropolitan France, generated using a GR-family hydrological model (GR5H-RI) under three forecasting approaches differing in calibration strategy and use of data assimilation. Random Forest and Multilayer Perceptron models are used to post-process forecasts at lead times of 3, 6, 12 and 24 h. Forecast performance is evaluated using both continuous skill metrics relative to persistence and threshold-based metrics for flood event detection. Results show that (1) post-processing consistently improves forecast skill at short lead times, especially for slower-response catchments, with the median persistence score increasing from 0.33 to 0.54 at a 3-h lead time in the highest-skill forecasting setup and performance improving in 89.7% of catchments; (2) the largest gains occur for forecasts without data assimilation, suggesting that post-processing can partially compensate for the lack of state updating but cannot fully replace it; and (3) neural network-based post-processing slightly outperforms tree-based models in continuous metrics, while differences are more limited for event detection. Overall, results highlight the complementary roles of data assimilation and machine-learning post-processing and demonstrate the potential of such frameworks for operational flood forecasting.

Related

  1. Improving global precipitation forecasts with an AI weather model trained on satellite observations
    Julian F. Schmitt, Bertrand Delorme, Robert C. King +4
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyarXiv
  2. A cost-effective data assimilation system for improving ROMS simulations in the Southwest Atlantic
    Geoff S Dorfschäfer, Clemente A S Tanajura, Thiago P De Paula +2
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOceanography & cryosphereStatisticsPLOSEurope PMC
  3. Improving large-scale river routing models with ESA long-term CCI discharge data assimilation: advancing accuracy for climate studies
    Malak Sadki, Gaëtan Noual, Simon Munier +5
    Hydrology and Earth System SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textHydrology & soilsCrossref
  4. The interface of data assimilation and machine learning
    Eviatar Bach
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyStatisticsarXiv
  5. Explore the ideology of deep learning in ENSO forecasts
    Yanhai Gan, Yipeng Chen, Ning Li +3
    Geoscience LettersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textClimate scienceDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{reis2026improving,
  title = {{Improving flood forecasts: the combined impact of data assimilation and machine learning post-processing}},
  author = {Gustavo Gabbardo dos Reis and Paul Astagneau and François Bourgin and Vazken Andréassian and Charles Perrin},
  journal = {Journal of Hydrology},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.136402},
  url = {https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05766794v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Improving flood forecasts: the combined impact of data assimilation and machine learning post-processing
AU  - Gustavo Gabbardo dos Reis
AU  - Paul Astagneau
AU  - François Bourgin
AU  - Vazken Andréassian
AU  - Charles Perrin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
JO  - Journal of Hydrology
DO  - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.136402
UR  - https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05766794v1
AB  - Accurate streamflow forecasts are essential for flood risk management and impact mitigation. Coupling hydrological models with machine learning techniques has gained increasing attention as a means to improve forecast skill, with post-processing emerging as a promising approach to correcting systematic model residuals. However, the interaction between machine-learning post-processing, data assimilation and calibration strategies remains insufficiently explored. In this study, we assess the contribution of machine-learning-based post-processing to hourly streamflow forecasts for 687 catchments in metropolitan France, generated using a GR-family hydrological model (GR5H-RI) under three forecasting approaches differing in calibration strategy and use of data assimilation. Random Forest and Multilayer Perceptron models are used to post-process forecasts at lead times of 3, 6, 12 and 24 h. Forecast performance is evaluated using both continuous skill metrics relative to persistence and threshold-based metrics for flood event detection. Results show that (1) post-processing consistently improves forecast skill at short lead times, especially for slower-response catchments, with the median persistence score increasing from 0.33 to 0.54 at a 3-h lead time in the highest-skill forecasting setup and performance improving in 89.7% of catchments; (2) the largest gains occur for forecasts without data assimilation, suggesting that post-processing can partially compensate for the lack of state updating but cannot fully replace it; and (3) neural network-based post-processing slightly outperforms tree-based models in continuous metrics, while differences are more limited for event detection. Overall, results highlight the complementary roles of data assimilation and machine-learning post-processing and demonstrate the potential of such frameworks for operational flood forecasting.
SN  - 0022-1694
SN  - 1879-2707
ER  -