Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,631 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Quantum Estimation under Decoherence in Neutrino Oscillations: Quantum Resources, Flavor Accessibility, and Multiparameter Incompatibility

Abstract

Neutrino oscillations offer an interferometric setting for open-system dynamics, quantum resources, and parameter estimation. We distinguish two often-conflated statistical families: propagation-basis dephasing uses a survival factor ηp to damp interference before flavor projection, changing flavor probabilities; effective flavor-mode dephasing suppresses only off-diagonal coherence of a single-particle, two-mode state while fixing its populations. For the two-flavor mode state, we derive exact concurrence, entanglement of formation, and local quantum uncertainty, and reduce one-sided projective discord to a one-parameter optimization. For 0<P<1 and 0<ηm<1, the QFIM in (P,χ,ηm) is diagonal, with ℋmodeχχ=Cηm2 and ℋmodeξmξm=Cηm2/(1−ηm2), where ξm=−lnηm. For propagation-basis dephasing, basis-matched QFI and flavor FI separate dynamical information loss from measurement inaccessibility for the mixing angle, mass-squared splitting, and dephasing rate. A monochromatic three-flavor benchmark evaluates the mixed-state QFIM, flavor FIM, and SLD incompatibility for (θ23,δCP,ξ31,g) at DUNE-like, T2HK-like, and ESSnuSB-inspired points. At Γ0=10−23 GeV, the fixed-coordinate ratio ℱflavδδ/ℋδδ is approximately $0.010$, $0.013$, and $0.105$, respectively; all three points show strong θ23--ξ31 incompatibility. A single-energy flavor measurement supplies only two independent probabilities, so its four-parameter FIM is rank deficient: these diagonal ratios are conditional diagnostics, not joint four-parameter sensitivities. These are state-level information-geometric benchmarks, not event-level sensitivity forecasts.

Related

  1. Multiparameter Quantum Estimation and Degeneracy Structure in Three-Flavor Neutrino Oscillations
    Bhavna Yadav, Amir Subba, Yu Shi
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. When can decoherence reveal a Majorana phase? A phase-covariance no-go theorem for two-flavor neutrino oscillations
    Atsushi Otsuka
    Nuclear Physics BPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsCrossref
  3. Measurement incompatibility in Bayesian quantum estimation beyond quadratic loss
    Francesco Albarelli, Stefano Chessa, Jesús Rubio
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Response of Hellinger-distance based coherence to weak decoherence in two-flavor neutrino oscillations
    Saurabh Rai, Nilakshi Das, Tejhas Kapoor
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationHALarXiv
  5. Influence of quantum decoherence on the survival of quantumness in neutrino oscillations
    Jilali Loulijat, Abdallah Slaoui, Mohamed Gouighri +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{loulijat2026quantum,
  title = {{Quantum Estimation under Decoherence in Neutrino Oscillations: Quantum Resources, Flavor Accessibility, and Multiparameter Incompatibility}},
  author = {Jilali Loulijat and Abdallah Slaoui and Mohamed Gouighri and Berihu Teklu},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.36038},
  eprint = {2609.36038},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36038},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Quantum Estimation under Decoherence in Neutrino Oscillations: Quantum Resources, Flavor Accessibility, and Multiparameter Incompatibility
AU  - Jilali Loulijat
AU  - Abdallah Slaoui
AU  - Mohamed Gouighri
AU  - Berihu Teklu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.36038
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36038
AB  - Neutrino oscillations offer an interferometric setting for open-system dynamics, quantum resources, and parameter estimation. We distinguish two often-conflated statistical families: propagation-basis dephasing uses a survival factor η_p to damp interference before flavor projection, changing flavor probabilities; effective flavor-mode dephasing suppresses only off-diagonal coherence of a single-particle, two-mode state while fixing its populations. For the two-flavor mode state, we derive exact concurrence, entanglement of formation, and local quantum uncertainty, and reduce one-sided projective discord to a one-parameter optimization. For 0<P<1 and 0<η_m<1, the QFIM in (P,χ,η_m) is diagonal, with ℋ^mode_χχ=C_η_m^2 and ℋ^mode_ξ_mξ_m=C_η_m^2/(1−η_m^2), where ξ_m=−lnη_m. For propagation-basis dephasing, basis-matched QFI and flavor FI separate dynamical information loss from measurement inaccessibility for the mixing angle, mass-squared splitting, and dephasing rate. A monochromatic three-flavor benchmark evaluates the mixed-state QFIM, flavor FIM, and SLD incompatibility for (θ_23,δ_CP,ξ_31,g) at DUNE-like, T2HK-like, and ESSnuSB-inspired points. At Γ_0=10^−23 GeV, the fixed-coordinate ratio ℱ^flav_δδ/ℋ_δδ is approximately $0.010$, $0.013$, and $0.105$, respectively; all three points show strong θ_23--ξ_31 incompatibility. A single-energy flavor measurement supplies only two independent probabilities, so its four-parameter FIM is rank deficient: these diagonal ratios are conditional diagnostics, not joint four-parameter sensitivities. These are state-level information-geometric benchmarks, not event-level sensitivity forecasts.
ER  -