Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
210,089 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Prognostic value of Amyloid PET in Real-World Amnestic MCI: Influence of reader experience and interpretation method

  1. 1Neurology Department, University of Navarra Clinic, Pamplona, Spain
  2. 2Nuclear Medicine Department, University of Navarra Clinic, Pamplona, Spain
  3. 3Medical Physics. Nuclear Medicine Department, University of Navarra Clinic, Pamplona, Spain

Abstract

Purpose: This study assessed the prognostic value and inter-/intra-observer reliability of three amyloid PET interpretation methods—conventional visual reading, assisted visual interpretation and standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR)-based quantification—for predicting conversion to Alzheimer’s disease (AD).

Methods: This retrospective longitudinal study included 145 patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment who underwent amyloid PET and were followed for up to 8 years at a single memory clinic. Two certified nuclear medicine physicians performed structured visual reads and assisted visual interpretations. Semiquantitative SUVR thresholds validated in prior studies were applied as a third method. Inter- and intra-observer agreement was assessed using Cohen’s kappa (κ). Cox regression models estimated the association of conversion to AD in PET-positive versus PET-negative patients for each method, adjusting for age, sex and education.

Results: Inter-observer agreement was excellent for structured visual reading (κ = 0.877) and assisted visual interpretation (κ = 0.904). Intra-observer reliability was also high (κ = 0.891 for Reader 1; κ = 0.859 for Reader 2). Consensus agreement for the assisted method reached κ = 0.936. Amyloid PET positivity was strongly associated with progression to AD across all methods. Hazard ratios were highest for assisted visual interpretation (HR = 3.23, 95% CI 1.94–5.38, p < 0.0001), followed by SUVR quantification (HR = 2.19, 95% CI 1.55–3.10, p < 0.0001) and structured visual reading (HR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.10–3.06, p = 0.02).

Conclusion: Amyloid PET positivity consistently predicted conversion to AD regardless of interpretation method. Assisted visual and semiquantitative approaches showed numerically higher prognostic discrimination, while expert structured visual reading remained clinically reliable.

Related

  1. Multimodal neuroimaging and electrophysiological signatures in amnestic mild cognitive impairment with different amyloid-β deposition status: correlations with cognitive function and diagnostic value
    Yang Liang, Peixue Li, Lin Liu +2
    Frontiers in aging neurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. T and B cell subsets differentially correlate with amyloid deposition and neurocognitive function in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment after one year of physical activity
    Katherine Poinsatte, Nancy L. Monson, Rong Zhang +6
    PubMedPeer-reviewedLicence not stated20 citedPsychiatry & mental healthOpenAlex
  3. Influence of Hepatocellular Senescence on Serum Amyloid A Expression and Response to Proinflammatory Cytokines under Steatotic Conditions
    Toru Takarada, Masaki Shimada, Izumi Omura +2
    Biological and Pharmaceutical BulletinPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textPhysiologyJ-STAGE
  4. Efficacy of Sorafenib Combined with Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Newly Diagnosed FLT3-ITD-Mutant Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Remission Efficacy and Prognostic Influence of Post-Remission Consolidation Therapy
    Qi Chen, Wenbing Duan, Jinsong Jia +7
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Partner presence in labor: does it influence maternal anxiety and childbirth experience beyond pain?
    Arif Onur Atay, Samican Ozmen, Mucahit Furkan Balci +1
    BMC pregnancy and childbirthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMCDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{echeveste2026prognostic,
  title = {{Prognostic value of Amyloid PET in Real-World Amnestic MCI: Influence of reader experience and interpretation method}},
  author = {Beatriz Echeveste and Edgar Fernando Guillén and Elena Prieto and Katharina C. E. Hirschmüller and Mario Riverol and Javier Arbizu},
  journal = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1007/s00259-026-08159-9},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-026-08159-9},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Prognostic value of Amyloid PET in Real-World Amnestic MCI: Influence of reader experience and interpretation method
AU  - Beatriz Echeveste
AU  - Edgar Fernando Guillén
AU  - Elena Prieto
AU  - Katharina C. E. Hirschmüller
AU  - Mario Riverol
AU  - Javier Arbizu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/28
JO  - European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
DO  - 10.1007/s00259-026-08159-9
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-026-08159-9
AB  - Purpose: This study assessed the prognostic value and inter-/intra-observer reliability of three amyloid PET interpretation methods—conventional visual reading, assisted visual interpretation and standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR)-based quantification—for predicting conversion to Alzheimer’s disease (AD).  Methods: This retrospective longitudinal study included 145 patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment who underwent amyloid PET and were followed for up to 8 years at a single memory clinic. Two certified nuclear medicine physicians performed structured visual reads and assisted visual interpretations. Semiquantitative SUVR thresholds validated in prior studies were applied as a third method. Inter- and intra-observer agreement was assessed using Cohen’s kappa (κ). Cox regression models estimated the association of conversion to AD in PET-positive versus PET-negative patients for each method, adjusting for age, sex and education.  Results: Inter-observer agreement was excellent for structured visual reading (κ = 0.877) and assisted visual interpretation (κ = 0.904). Intra-observer reliability was also high (κ = 0.891 for Reader 1; κ = 0.859 for Reader 2). Consensus agreement for the assisted method reached κ = 0.936. Amyloid PET positivity was strongly associated with progression to AD across all methods. Hazard ratios were highest for assisted visual interpretation (HR = 3.23, 95% CI 1.94–5.38, p < 0.0001), followed by SUVR quantification (HR = 2.19, 95% CI 1.55–3.10, p < 0.0001) and structured visual reading (HR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.10–3.06, p = 0.02).  Conclusion: Amyloid PET positivity consistently predicted conversion to AD regardless of interpretation method. Assisted visual and semiquantitative approaches showed numerically higher prognostic discrimination, while expert structured visual reading remained clinically reliable.
SN  - 1619-7070
SN  - 1619-7089
ER  -