Functional and Structural Brain Age Gaps as Complementary Predictive Markers for Cognitive Performance
- 1Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone, UMR 7289, CNRS, Aix-Marseille University
Abstract
Cognitive decline is characterized by substantial inter-individual variability across the lifespan, even among clinically healthy adults. However, it is unclear how structural and functional brain organization jointly relate to differences in cognitive performance within the typical populations. We considered a multimodal brain age framework by predicting for each subject its age from either structural MRI or resting-state functional MRI, after training on the 1000BRAINS cohort (901 participants, 18-85 years). Following, a structural and a functional brain age gap markers were defined as the deviations with respect to the real chronological age. We then used the markers to characterize the interplay between structure and function in shaping cognitive performances. Our findings reveal that the functional marker is as important to predict global cognitive performance as the structural marker. The most accurate prediction was found for global cognition, executive functions and episodic memory, followed by working memory, attention and language. In particular, the structural marker was contributing to all domains, except for working memory, whereas the functional marker had the highest contribution. Overall, structural and functional brain age models together provide a meaningful subject-level summary of brain information for predicting cognition, supporting a multidimensional view of typical aging.
Related
- Brain age prediction from structural and functional connectivity across the lifespan using connectome-based predictive modeling
- Diagnostic and predictive value of structural and high-order functional brain topology in major depressive disorder
- Tumor lesions in the supplementary motor area may induce large-scale sensorimotor and cognitive network alterations— A functional and structural connectivity analysis
- Complementary axes of functional system integrity and integration with divergent clinical correlates characterize focal epilepsy
- Complementary Genomic and Functional Potential of Bacillus subtilis RKM-1 and Bacillus licheniformis RKM-2 for Organic Waste Bioconversion and Composting
BibTeX
@misc{crocetta2026functional,
title = {{Functional and Structural Brain Age Gaps as Complementary Predictive Markers for Cognitive Performance}},
author = {A. Crocetta and M. Morandini and N. Bittner and S. Caspers and F. Cauda and A. Brovelli and M. Gilson},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.20.760445},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.20.760445v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Functional and Structural Brain Age Gaps as Complementary Predictive Markers for Cognitive Performance
AU - A. Crocetta
AU - M. Morandini
AU - N. Bittner
AU - S. Caspers
AU - F. Cauda
AU - A. Brovelli
AU - M. Gilson
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/20
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.20.760445
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.20.760445v1
AB - Cognitive decline is characterized by substantial inter-individual variability across the lifespan, even among clinically healthy adults. However, it is unclear how structural and functional brain organization jointly relate to differences in cognitive performance within the typical populations. We considered a multimodal brain age framework by predicting for each subject its age from either structural MRI or resting-state functional MRI, after training on the 1000BRAINS cohort (901 participants, 18-85 years). Following, a structural and a functional brain age gap markers were defined as the deviations with respect to the real chronological age. We then used the markers to characterize the interplay between structure and function in shaping cognitive performances. Our findings reveal that the functional marker is as important to predict global cognitive performance as the structural marker. The most accurate prediction was found for global cognition, executive functions and episodic memory, followed by working memory, attention and language. In particular, the structural marker was contributing to all domains, except for working memory, whereas the functional marker had the highest contribution. Overall, structural and functional brain age models together provide a meaningful subject-level summary of brain information for predicting cognition, supporting a multidimensional view of typical aging.
ER -