Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 48 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Influence of local and global solar magnetic fields on medium-term forecasting of the number and parameters of coronal mass ejections

  • Irina A. Bilenko
Open at sourcePDFDOICite

Abstract

It has been shown that both the frequency and parameters of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) increased as solar cycles 23-25 approached their maxima and decreased toward their minima. However, significant differences were identified in the cyclic evolution of strong versus weak CMEs. Unlike weak CMEs, powerful, high-speed CMEs, characterized by large angular widths and substantial mass and energy, follow the cyclic evolution of active regions. During periods when the sector structure of the global magnetic field (GMF) dominates, the latitudinal distribution of CMEs becomes more uniform, and their frequency and parameter values increase, particularly during the declining phase of solar activity. A method based on combining GMF parameter data and Wolf numbers has been proposed for the medium-term forecasting of the frequency and parameters of strong and weak CMEs in cycle 26. A comparison of predicted and observed CME parameters for cycle 25 shows good agreement.

Related

  1. On the 3D Magnetic Structure of Coronal Mass Ejections Through the Solar Corona
    Erika Palmerio, Michal Ben-Nun, Tibor Török +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textSolar & stellar physicsarXiv
  2. On the 3D Magnetic Structure of Coronal Mass Ejections through the Solar Corona
    Erika Palmerio, Michal Ben-Nun, Tibor Török +2
    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  3. Evidence for Interacting Coronal Mass Ejections in a Magnetic-cloud-like Ejecta: Insights from Multipoint Observations and Polytropic Analysis
    Jyoti Sheoran, Vaibhav Pant, Eva Weiler +5
    The Astrophysical JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  4. Coronal Mass Ejections from Young Suns: An Observational View through the Solar-Stellar Connection
    Kosuke Namekata
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy astrophysicsPlanetary science & exoplanetsarXiv
  5. A Global Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation of the Birth and Cannibalism of Homologous Coronal Mass Ejections
    Lijun Cai, Chaowei Jiang, Zhenhua Liu +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textSolar & stellar physicsarXiv

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@misc{bilenko2026influence,
  title = {{Influence of local and global solar magnetic fields on medium-term forecasting of the number and parameters of coronal mass ejections}},
  author = {Irina A. Bilenko},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2607.18971},
  eprint = {2607.18971},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18971},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Influence of local and global solar magnetic fields on medium-term forecasting of the number and parameters of coronal mass ejections
AU  - Irina A. Bilenko
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/17
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2607.18971
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18971
AB  - It has been shown that both the frequency and parameters of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) increased as solar cycles 23-25 approached their maxima and decreased toward their minima. However, significant differences were identified in the cyclic evolution of strong versus weak CMEs. Unlike weak CMEs, powerful, high-speed CMEs, characterized by large angular widths and substantial mass and energy, follow the cyclic evolution of active regions. During periods when the sector structure of the global magnetic field (GMF) dominates, the latitudinal distribution of CMEs becomes more uniform, and their frequency and parameter values increase, particularly during the declining phase of solar activity. A method based on combining GMF parameter data and Wolf numbers has been proposed for the medium-term forecasting of the frequency and parameters of strong and weak CMEs in cycle 26. A comparison of predicted and observed CME parameters for cycle 25 shows good agreement.
ER  -