Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Inference after selection on randomized p-values

Abstract

We consider inference on parameters and hypotheses selected using p-values. We provide a simple procedure to decompose a p-value into two components, one for inference and one for selection, that are independent under the null hypothesis. To control the Type 1 error rate conditional on selection of the null hypothesis from randomized p-values, we develop tests motivated by the selective inference approaches of data thinning, fission, and carving. Unlike the typical application of these approaches, however, our tests only make use of the p-values rather than the full data. Furthermore, we construct confidence intervals that attain the nominal conditional coverage and corresponding estimators. In the context of the file drawer problem, the winner's curse, and sequential testing, we show that our proposals offer both theoretical and empirical advantages over existing randomized and non-randomized approaches. Lastly, we apply our methods for selective inference on genetic associations using publicly-available p-values from the UK Biobank.

Related

  1. SLICE: Sequential Likelihood-Free Inference via Conformal E-Values
    Stefano Cortinovis, Laura Battaglia, François Caron
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. A Tutorial on Safe Anytime-Valid Inference: Practical Maximally Flexible Sampling Designs for Experiments Based on e-Values
    Alexander Ly, Udo Boehm, Peter Grünwald +2
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsOSF
  3. p ‐Values Are Not Evidence: Navigating the Gap Across Modes of Inference
    Hallie E. Arno, Robert J. Blackmore, Samantha E. Crowley +7
    Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsCrossrefDOAJEurope PMCPMC
  4. Automated, Efficient, and Model-Free Inference for Randomized Clinical Trials via Data-Driven Covariate Adjustment
    Kelly Van Lancker, Ivan Matos Diaz, Stijn Vansteelandt
    The American StatisticianPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text15 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  5. Collaborative representations for targeted causal inference under outcome selection
    Johan de Aguas
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{perry2026inference,
  title = {{Inference after selection on randomized p-values}},
  author = {Ronan Perry and Daniela Witten},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.07459},
  eprint = {2611.07459},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07459},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Inference after selection on randomized p-values
AU  - Ronan Perry
AU  - Daniela Witten
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/05
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.07459
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07459
AB  - We consider inference on parameters and hypotheses selected using p-values. We provide a simple procedure to decompose a p-value into two components, one for inference and one for selection, that are independent under the null hypothesis. To control the Type 1 error rate conditional on selection of the null hypothesis from randomized p-values, we develop tests motivated by the selective inference approaches of data thinning, fission, and carving. Unlike the typical application of these approaches, however, our tests only make use of the p-values rather than the full data. Furthermore, we construct confidence intervals that attain the nominal conditional coverage and corresponding estimators. In the context of the file drawer problem, the winner's curse, and sequential testing, we show that our proposals offer both theoretical and empirical advantages over existing randomized and non-randomized approaches. Lastly, we apply our methods for selective inference on genetic associations using publicly-available p-values from the UK Biobank.
ER  -