Accuracy of Provisional Reports by Radiology Residents on Call.
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR.
- 2Department of Radiology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, GBR.
- 3Department of Radiology, Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, GBR.
- 4Department of Radiology, Royal Stoke University Hospital NHS Trust, Stoke, GBR.
Abstract
Background Out-of-hours (OOH) CT and MRI examinations at our institution are provisionally reported by on-call radiology residents and used to guide overnight patient management. We aimed to quantify the overnight discrepancy rate between provisional resident reports and subsequent consultant reports, and explore associations between discrepancies and resident grade, study type, and reporting time. Methods This registered service evaluation retrospectively reviewed all consecutive CT and MRI examinations provisionally reported overnight by radiology residents between 13 June 2022 and 3 July 2022. Provisional reports were compared with the final consultant reports. Discrepancies were categorised as minor, significant, or major using predefined criteria by an ST4 radiology resident. Results In total, 993 imaging examinations were included. The overall discrepancy rate was 144 (14.5%). Major and significant discrepancies comprised 56 of 993 (5.6%) examinations and were considered potentially management-altering. Discrepancy rates varied significantly by imaging speciality (chi-square (χ²) test, p < 0.001): body imaging (21.6%), musculoskeletal (MSK) imaging (17.2%), neuro-radiological imaging (11.7%), and vascular imaging (5.4%). No statistically significant association was identified between discrepancy rates and resident training grade (χ² test, p = 0.48) or one-hour reporting time block (χ² test, p = 0.37). Conclusion This service evaluation showed that provisional radiology reporting is associated with a meaningful discrepancy burden, paying careful attention to variation across imaging specialities. Notably, no statistically significant association was identified between discrepancy rates and resident seniority or time of reporting. Timely consultant review, structured feedback and targeted quality improvement with re-audit will support safe and accurate OOH reporting.
Related
- Knowledge distillation-based lightweight generative large language models for standardized quality control of Chinese radiology reports
- Can Jev Judge Radiology Reports? Evaluating a System One Model for Clinical Factuality
- Multi-Scale MRI, Radiology Reports, and Blood Biomarker–Guided Multimodal Deep Learning for Predicting Postoperative Recurrence in Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Study
- Perceptions of artificial intelligence for radiographic image accuracy: a cross-sectional survey of radiology personnel
- Psychological factors contribute more to chronic low back pain than spine pathology: An LLM-based analysis of radiology reports
BibTeX
@article{dean2026accuracy,
title = {{Accuracy of Provisional Reports by Radiology Residents on Call.}},
author = {Mariam Dean and Hammad Qadi and Ali Rana and Kar Yan-Yip and Anmol Gangi Burton},
journal = {Cureus},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.7759/cureus.118704},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42953452},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Accuracy of Provisional Reports by Radiology Residents on Call.
AU - Mariam Dean
AU - Hammad Qadi
AU - Ali Rana
AU - Kar Yan-Yip
AU - Anmol Gangi Burton
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/28
JO - Cureus
DO - 10.7759/cureus.118704
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42953452
AB - Background Out-of-hours (OOH) CT and MRI examinations at our institution are provisionally reported by on-call radiology residents and used to guide overnight patient management. We aimed to quantify the overnight discrepancy rate between provisional resident reports and subsequent consultant reports, and explore associations between discrepancies and resident grade, study type, and reporting time. Methods This registered service evaluation retrospectively reviewed all consecutive CT and MRI examinations provisionally reported overnight by radiology residents between 13 June 2022 and 3 July 2022. Provisional reports were compared with the final consultant reports. Discrepancies were categorised as minor, significant, or major using predefined criteria by an ST4 radiology resident. Results In total, 993 imaging examinations were included. The overall discrepancy rate was 144 (14.5%). Major and significant discrepancies comprised 56 of 993 (5.6%) examinations and were considered potentially management-altering. Discrepancy rates varied significantly by imaging speciality (chi-square (χ²) test, p < 0.001): body imaging (21.6%), musculoskeletal (MSK) imaging (17.2%), neuro-radiological imaging (11.7%), and vascular imaging (5.4%). No statistically significant association was identified between discrepancy rates and resident training grade (χ² test, p = 0.48) or one-hour reporting time block (χ² test, p = 0.37). Conclusion This service evaluation showed that provisional radiology reporting is associated with a meaningful discrepancy burden, paying careful attention to variation across imaging specialities. Notably, no statistically significant association was identified between discrepancy rates and resident seniority or time of reporting. Timely consultant review, structured feedback and targeted quality improvement with re-audit will support safe and accurate OOH reporting.
SN - 2168-8184
ER -