Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0BMC Public Health

Youth perspectives on sugar-sweetened beverages and the UK soft drinks industry levy: secondary analysis of focus group data using the theory of planned behaviour

Abstract

Background: Adolescents are among the highest consumers of sweetened beverages in the UK. The UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy (SDIL) was one of the first sugar sweetened beverage (SSB) taxes globally that aimed to incentivise manufacturers to reformulate SSBs to reduce their sugar content as an element of government plans to reduce childhood obesity. We aimed to develop a theoretically informed understanding of adolescents’ views of sugar, SSBs and the UK SDIL to explore how effectively the SDIL may be working in the target group and to inform future research in the long-term evaluation of the SDIL. The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) has been widely used to assess dietary patterns quantitatively, however there is a lack of qualitative application, particularly in the context of population-based interventions such as the SDIL.

Methods: We conducted secondary analysis of focus groups with 23 participants from two state-funded schools in Essex, UK. Ages ranged from 11 to 14 years old, 15 were female, 8 were male. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and we applied the constructs of the TPB qualitatively.

Results: Six interrelated and overlapping themes identified constructs of the TPB (attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, intention and behaviour) and a lack of awareness of the UK SDIL among the adolescents. The most prominent subthemes that influenced adolescents’ perspectives were the attitude that ‘sugar is bad’ and parental restriction. An adaptation of the TPB model is proposed which illustrates the overlapping of constructs and incorporates a two-way feedback loop between perceived behavioural control and behaviour, which bypasses intention.

Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study that applies the TPB qualitatively to analyse adolescents’ perceptions of sugar, SSBs, and the SDIL (a real implemented policy change). Adolescents expressed support for population-based interventions to reduce sugar consumption but were largely unaware of the SDIL. Therefore, it is suggested that expanding the SDIL to currently exempt SSBs and fruit juices could be acceptable to the target group and would likely further reduce sugar consumption. Further research is needed to explore perspectives regarding currently exempt drinks.

Related

  1. Understanding consumption patterns of sugar-sweetened beverages across stages of adolescence in Mumbai city, India: an exploratory cross-sectional study for insights to develop innovative sugar reduction strategies
    Arti Muley, Aditi Deshmane, Prita Kawli
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Childhood Obesity: A Life-Course Perspective
    Bianca Simionescu, Ancuța Lupu, Alexandra Sidoreac +10
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMC
  3. What happens when sugar-sweetened beverage labelling and tax policies are extended to non-sugar sweetened beverages? A national study of Australians’ responses
    Kerry Ettridge, Enola Kay, Joanne Dono +1
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  4. Bittersweet: a multi-method qualitative analysis of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages (SSB) tax discussion in the Nigerian media.
    Abayomi Tajudeen Sarumi, Opeyemi Ibitoye, Joy Amafah-Isaac +2
    BMC public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  5. Association between secondary school nutrition education and dietary behaviour in UK university students: a cross-sectional study
    Bokamoso Lame Zitha, Esther Ariyo
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{mccarthy2026youth,
  title = {{Youth perspectives on sugar-sweetened beverages and the UK soft drinks industry levy: secondary analysis of focus group data using the theory of planned behaviour}},
  author = {Rachael McCarthy and Catrin Jones and Martin White},
  journal = {BMC Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-29693-z},
  url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12889-026-29693-z},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Youth perspectives on sugar-sweetened beverages and the UK soft drinks industry levy: secondary analysis of focus group data using the theory of planned behaviour
AU  - Rachael McCarthy
AU  - Catrin Jones
AU  - Martin White
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/06
JO  - BMC Public Health
DO  - 10.1186/s12889-026-29693-z
UR  - https://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12889-026-29693-z
AB  - Background: Adolescents are among the highest consumers of sweetened beverages in the UK. The UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy (SDIL) was one of the first sugar sweetened beverage (SSB) taxes globally that aimed to incentivise manufacturers to reformulate SSBs to reduce their sugar content as an element of government plans to reduce childhood obesity. We aimed to develop a theoretically informed understanding of adolescents’ views of sugar, SSBs and the UK SDIL to explore how effectively the SDIL may be working in the target group and to inform future research in the long-term evaluation of the SDIL. The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) has been widely used to assess dietary patterns quantitatively, however there is a lack of qualitative application, particularly in the context of population-based interventions such as the SDIL.  Methods: We conducted secondary analysis of focus groups with 23 participants from two state-funded schools in Essex, UK. Ages ranged from 11 to 14 years old, 15 were female, 8 were male. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and we applied the constructs of the TPB qualitatively.  Results: Six interrelated and overlapping themes identified constructs of the TPB (attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, intention and behaviour) and a lack of awareness of the UK SDIL among the adolescents. The most prominent subthemes that influenced adolescents’ perspectives were the attitude that ‘sugar is bad’ and parental restriction. An adaptation of the TPB model is proposed which illustrates the overlapping of constructs and incorporates a two-way feedback loop between perceived behavioural control and behaviour, which bypasses intention.  Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study that applies the TPB qualitatively to analyse adolescents’ perceptions of sugar, SSBs, and the SDIL (a real implemented policy change). Adolescents expressed support for population-based interventions to reduce sugar consumption but were largely unaware of the SDIL. Therefore, it is suggested that expanding the SDIL to currently exempt SSBs and fruit juices could be acceptable to the target group and would likely further reduce sugar consumption. Further research is needed to explore perspectives regarding currently exempt drinks.
SN  - 1471-2458
ER  -