Mathematical foundations of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a systematic review
- 1Departamento de Química y Producción, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja, Ecuador
- 2Theoretical and Experimental Epistemology Lab, School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
- 3Department of Systems Design Engineering, Physics, and Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare relies on diverse mathematical frameworks, yet their contributions to model development, evaluation, interpretability, and clinical translation remain fragmented. This systematic review synthesized the classical and emerging mathematical foundations underpinning healthcare AI and examined major methodological and application trends. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, studies published between January 2016 and June 30, 2026, were identified through systematic searches of Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed/MEDLINE, with searches conducted using Harzing’s Publish or Perish v8 where applicable. Bibliometric analysis was performed using VOSviewer, while methodological quality was assessed using an adapted JBI-based framework and AMSTAR-2 for systematic reviews. Of 653 records identified, 147 studies met the eligibility criteria. Non-mutually exclusive mathematical-domain coding identified linear algebra in 100/147 studies (68.0%), calculus and optimization in 91/147 (61.9%), and probability and statistics in 79/147 (53.7%), highlighting their roles in data representation, learning, optimization, inference, uncertainty quantification, and validation. A separate mutually exclusive classification of dominant methodological themes identified explainable and trustworthy AI in 24/147 studies (16.3%), statistics and learning theory in 23/147 (15.6%), probability and Bayesian methods in 23/147 (15.6%), calculus and optimization in 19/147 (12.9%), and linear algebra in 15/147 (10.2%). Radiology and medical imaging were the leading healthcare application (24.3%), while classification and diagnosis were the most frequent clinical task (17.1%). Overall, healthcare AI is supported by an interconnected mathematical ecosystem. Emerging approaches, including graph neural networks, Transformers, and quantum machine learning, require stronger external validation, standardized benchmarking, and rigorous evaluation for reliable clinical translation.
Related
- Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Systems in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Organizational Outcomes.
- Implementation determinants and outcomes of artificial intelligence in surgical healthcare: a systematic review protocol
- The application value of artificial intelligence in medical imaging: foundations, progress, and challenges.
- Artificial Intelligence in Thoracic Surgical Oncology: Technical Foundations and Applications in Lung and Esophageal Cancer Surgery
- WITHDRAWN: Relevance Based Prediction: A Transparent, Non-Artificial Intelligence, Mathematical Solution to Personalized Opioid Treatment
BibTeX
@article{jimenezgaona2026mathematical,
title = {{Mathematical foundations of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a systematic review}},
author = {Yuliana Jiménez-Gaona and Vasudevan Lakshminarayanan},
journal = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/frai.2026.1995929},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2026.1995929},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Mathematical foundations of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a systematic review
AU - Yuliana Jiménez-Gaona
AU - Vasudevan Lakshminarayanan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
JO - Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
DO - 10.3389/frai.2026.1995929
UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2026.1995929
AB - Artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare relies on diverse mathematical frameworks, yet their contributions to model development, evaluation, interpretability, and clinical translation remain fragmented. This systematic review synthesized the classical and emerging mathematical foundations underpinning healthcare AI and examined major methodological and application trends. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, studies published between January 2016 and June 30, 2026, were identified through systematic searches of Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed/MEDLINE, with searches conducted using Harzing’s Publish or Perish v8 where applicable. Bibliometric analysis was performed using VOSviewer, while methodological quality was assessed using an adapted JBI-based framework and AMSTAR-2 for systematic reviews. Of 653 records identified, 147 studies met the eligibility criteria. Non-mutually exclusive mathematical-domain coding identified linear algebra in 100/147 studies (68.0%), calculus and optimization in 91/147 (61.9%), and probability and statistics in 79/147 (53.7%), highlighting their roles in data representation, learning, optimization, inference, uncertainty quantification, and validation. A separate mutually exclusive classification of dominant methodological themes identified explainable and trustworthy AI in 24/147 studies (16.3%), statistics and learning theory in 23/147 (15.6%), probability and Bayesian methods in 23/147 (15.6%), calculus and optimization in 19/147 (12.9%), and linear algebra in 15/147 (10.2%). Radiology and medical imaging were the leading healthcare application (24.3%), while classification and diagnosis were the most frequent clinical task (17.1%). Overall, healthcare AI is supported by an interconnected mathematical ecosystem. Emerging approaches, including graph neural networks, Transformers, and quantum machine learning, require stronger external validation, standardized benchmarking, and rigorous evaluation for reliable clinical translation.
SN - 2624-8212
ER -