Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,625 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in oncology

LASSO-based nomogram to predict early treatment failure in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with SBRT, lenvatinib, and tislelizumab.

  1. 1Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.

Abstract

Background

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab has shown potential activity in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but early treatment failure (ETF) remains common. We developed an exploratory model to estimate ETF, defined as radiologically confirmed progressive disease (PD) or all-cause death within 6 months after treatment initiation.Methods

This single-center retrospective study included advanced HCC patients treated with the triple regimen from June 2021 to June 2024. Baseline clinical, imaging, and hematological variables were analyzed. LASSO regression with 10-fold cross-validation was used for feature selection. Restricted cubic splines assessed linearity, and λ.1se was examined as a sensitivity analysis. A multivariable logistic regression model was presented as a nomogram. Discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were evaluated, with 1000-resample bootstrap internal validation repeating the modeling pipeline.Results

Among 118 patients, 33 (27.9%) experienced ETF; 28 had radiologically confirmed PD and 5 died without prior documented PD. At λ.min, LASSO selected maximum tumor diameter, Vp4 portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT), baseline systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), ALBI score, and log10-transformed alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). Under λ.1se, four predictors were retained, with SII excluded. The final model had an apparent ROC-AUC of 0.903 and an optimism-corrected ROC-AUC of 0.866. Calibration showed acceptable agreement between predicted and observed risks. DCA suggested net benefit over an exploratory threshold range of approximately 0.10-0.50, which should not be interpreted as a validated treatment-switching threshold.Conclusion

The nomogram showed promising internal discrimination for estimating 6-month ETF risk in advanced HCC patients receiving SBRT, lenvatinib, and tislelizumab. Given the modest sample size and single-center design, the model remains exploratory and hypothesis-generating. External multicenter validation is required before clinical implementation or use for treatment selection.

Related

  1. A Case of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Responding to Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab after Lenvatinib Treatment
    Saki Sueda, Tomokazu Kawaoka, Yasutoshi Fujii +7
    Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineJ-STAGE
  2. Survival outcomes of spleen-strengthening and dampness-eliminating traditional Chinese medicine granules combined with lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a large-sample retrospective study based on electronic medical records
    Canchao Sun, Juan Xu, Tiye Sun
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus lenvatinib and programmed death receptor 1 inhibitor for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a prospective controlled study
    Kanglian Zheng, Ming Liu, Xu Zhu +17
    BMC MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0General medicineCrossref
  4. GLP-1 receptor agonist targets an AMPKα1-HIF1α-PFKFB3 metabolic vulnerability and enhances Lenvatinib response in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Takayuki Noma, Yuan Li, Yuma Wada +5
    npj Precision OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyDOAJ
  5. Tumor-derived annexin A1 drives lenvatinib resistance by regulating SOX2/STAT3/S100A6 feedback loop and M2 macrophage polarization in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Catherine Yu Jia Gu, Carmen Oi Ning Leung, Rainbow Wing Hei Leung +13
    Cell Death & DiseasePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMCEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{zhao2026lassobased,
  title = {{LASSO-based nomogram to predict early treatment failure in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with SBRT, lenvatinib, and tislelizumab.}},
  author = {Yingchun Zhao and Suming Wang and Li He and Xiaoqian Shen and Miaomiao Zhang and Sujing Zhang},
  journal = {Frontiers in oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fonc.2026.1905052},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908554},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - LASSO-based nomogram to predict early treatment failure in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with SBRT, lenvatinib, and tislelizumab.
AU  - Yingchun Zhao
AU  - Suming Wang
AU  - Li He
AU  - Xiaoqian Shen
AU  - Miaomiao Zhang
AU  - Sujing Zhang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - Frontiers in oncology
DO  - 10.3389/fonc.2026.1905052
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908554
AB  - Background  Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab has shown potential activity in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but early treatment failure (ETF) remains common. We developed an exploratory model to estimate ETF, defined as radiologically confirmed progressive disease (PD) or all-cause death within 6 months after treatment initiation.Methods  This single-center retrospective study included advanced HCC patients treated with the triple regimen from June 2021 to June 2024. Baseline clinical, imaging, and hematological variables were analyzed. LASSO regression with 10-fold cross-validation was used for feature selection. Restricted cubic splines assessed linearity, and λ.1se was examined as a sensitivity analysis. A multivariable logistic regression model was presented as a nomogram. Discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were evaluated, with 1000-resample bootstrap internal validation repeating the modeling pipeline.Results  Among 118 patients, 33 (27.9%) experienced ETF; 28 had radiologically confirmed PD and 5 died without prior documented PD. At λ.min, LASSO selected maximum tumor diameter, Vp4 portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT), baseline systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), ALBI score, and log10-transformed alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). Under λ.1se, four predictors were retained, with SII excluded. The final model had an apparent ROC-AUC of 0.903 and an optimism-corrected ROC-AUC of 0.866. Calibration showed acceptable agreement between predicted and observed risks. DCA suggested net benefit over an exploratory threshold range of approximately 0.10-0.50, which should not be interpreted as a validated treatment-switching threshold.Conclusion  The nomogram showed promising internal discrimination for estimating 6-month ETF risk in advanced HCC patients receiving SBRT, lenvatinib, and tislelizumab. Given the modest sample size and single-center design, the model remains exploratory and hypothesis-generating. External multicenter validation is required before clinical implementation or use for treatment selection.
SN  - 2234-943X
ER  -