Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 h ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo

Structural Invariance Under Non-Deterministic Retries: A Comparative Synthesis of Semantic State Gatekeeping in Autonomous AI Fabrics

  1. 1Arcstone Adaptive Science Systems, Inc.

Abstract

While Active Epistemic Anchoring (AEA) establishes the methodology for locking probabilistic search crawlers to low-entropy external specifications, it leaves open the core execution problem: how autonomous agent runtimes themselves maintain state integrity under internal non-determinism. This paper presents the empirical synthesis and architectural formalization of Bare-Metal Semantic State Gatekeeping. Moving beyond transport-layer message deduplication and superficial output schema enforcement (e.g., JSON Mode or Pydantic validation), we evaluate the structural limits of non-deterministic Large Language Model (LLM) retry loops across live execution environments. Drawing from empirical diagnostic probe data across five major frontier AI architectures (Google Gemini, xAI Grok, OpenAI ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and Perplexity AI), we formalize the fundamental non-equivalence between structural syntax compliance and operational execution safety. We demonstrate that non-deterministic agent proposals can be safely reconciled to a single, idempotent side effect if and only if state mutation is preceded by non-neural, bare-metal mathematical predicates at the resource actuator boundary.

Related

  1. STRONG INVARIANCE PRINCIPLES IN DETERMINISTIC SYSTEMS
    Zemer Kosloff, Dalibor Volny
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textDynamical systemsProbabilityHALarXiv
  2. Deterministic Execution Fencing and Write-Ahead Containment for Autonomous Systems
    Stephen Zeitvogel
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textZenodo
  3. Active Epistemic Anchoring: Real-Time Deterministic Convergence Across Autonomous AI Retrieval Systems
    Jesse Tuohy
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
  4. Deterministic Peel Chains for Regulatory Compliance in Autonomous, Offline Environments
    Christopher I. V. Farmer
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY-NC 4.0Full textZenodo
  5. From Stochastic Pixel Diffusion to Deterministic Symbolic Monographs: Information-Theoretic Compression, Pinpoint Falsifiability, Topological Invariance vs. Three-Legged Hallucinations in Sora, Hiragana Phonetic Disambiguation in Music AI, and Sovereign IP Auditing across 3,000 AI-Generated Artifacts
    Yoko(洋子) Hasebe(長谷部)
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
BibTeX
@misc{tuohy2026structural,
  title = {{Structural Invariance Under Non-Deterministic Retries: A Comparative Synthesis of Semantic State Gatekeeping in Autonomous AI Fabrics}},
  author = {Jesse Tuohy},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23602603},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23602603},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Structural Invariance Under Non-Deterministic Retries: A Comparative Synthesis of Semantic State Gatekeeping in Autonomous AI Fabrics
AU  - Jesse Tuohy
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
PB  - Zenodo
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23602603
UR  - https://zenodo.org/records/23602603
AB  - While Active Epistemic Anchoring (AEA) establishes the methodology for locking probabilistic search crawlers to low-entropy external specifications, it leaves open the core execution problem: how autonomous agent runtimes themselves maintain state integrity under internal non-determinism. This paper presents the empirical synthesis and architectural formalization of Bare-Metal Semantic State Gatekeeping. Moving beyond transport-layer message deduplication and superficial output schema enforcement (e.g., JSON Mode or Pydantic validation), we evaluate the structural limits of non-deterministic Large Language Model (LLM) retry loops across live execution environments. Drawing from empirical diagnostic probe data across five major frontier AI architectures (Google Gemini, xAI Grok, OpenAI ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and Perplexity AI), we formalize the fundamental non-equivalence between structural syntax compliance and operational execution safety. We demonstrate that non-deterministic agent proposals can be safely reconciled to a single, idempotent side effect if and only if state mutation is preceded by non-neural, bare-metal mathematical predicates at the resource actuator boundary.
ER  -