Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Information Erasure and Quantum Imprint in Quantum Measurement and First-Order SPAM Error Separation

Abstract

We introduce information erasure and quantum imprint as two properties that classify quantum instruments. Information erasure is the property that an appropriate postselection can render the distribution of earlier measurement outcomes independent of the initial quantum state while retaining all outcome branches. Quantum imprint is the complementary property that no admissible postselection can eliminate this state dependence. We show that this classification has a nontrivial structure and that the natural intuition that measurements providing more information about the initial quantum state should be less likely to exhibit information erasure does not hold in general. We further show that, under a sufficiently reliable postselection, information erasure enables first-order separation of state-preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors. Specifically, the first-order contribution of state-preparation error vanishes from the posterior distribution, whereas visible first-order contributions of measurement error remain. This result recasts SPAM error separation from the problem of simultaneously characterizing state preparation and measurement into the problem of realizing a reliable postselection.

Related

  1. Quantum-State Oblivious Transfer over Quantum Erasure Channels
    Remi A. Chou
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. High-Dimensional Deterministic Secure Quantum Communication with Reed-Solomon Erasure Coding
    L. F. A. de Sousa Moura, G. L. Zanin, P. H. Souto Ribeiro +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Spectral Reduction Selects the Observable Imprint of Dirac Quantum Geometry
    Zhongze Guo, Bei Xu, Qiang Gu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Entanglement inference from quantum erasure and path discrimination
    Mohd Asad Siddiqui
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Linear-time erasure recovery for quantum expander codes
    Anirudh Krishna, Christopher A. Pattison
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{suzuki2026information,
  title = {{Information Erasure and Quantum Imprint in Quantum Measurement and First-Order SPAM Error Separation}},
  author = {Taiga Suzuki and Yuki Ito and Masayuki Ohzeki},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.15586},
  eprint = {2609.15586},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15586},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Information Erasure and Quantum Imprint in Quantum Measurement and First-Order SPAM Error Separation
AU  - Taiga Suzuki
AU  - Yuki Ito
AU  - Masayuki Ohzeki
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/14
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.15586
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15586
AB  - We introduce information erasure and quantum imprint as two properties that classify quantum instruments. Information erasure is the property that an appropriate postselection can render the distribution of earlier measurement outcomes independent of the initial quantum state while retaining all outcome branches. Quantum imprint is the complementary property that no admissible postselection can eliminate this state dependence. We show that this classification has a nontrivial structure and that the natural intuition that measurements providing more information about the initial quantum state should be less likely to exhibit information erasure does not hold in general. We further show that, under a sufficiently reliable postselection, information erasure enables first-order separation of state-preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors. Specifically, the first-order contribution of state-preparation error vanishes from the posterior distribution, whereas visible first-order contributions of measurement error remain. This result recasts SPAM error separation from the problem of simultaneously characterizing state preparation and measurement into the problem of realizing a reliable postselection.
ER  -