The Physics–Mathematics Transformation: A Conceptual Framework for Bidirectional Scientific Discovery
- 1Independent Researcher
Abstract
Physics and mathematics are closely connected, but a shared formal description does not by itself establish an equivalence between physical and mathematical systems. This paper introduces the Physics–Mathematics Transformation (PMT) as a conceptual framework for investigating whether explicitly defined, restricted structural correspondences can facilitate discovery in either direction. In the mathematics-to-physics direction, a result obtained within a mathematical representation may yield a physical inference only when the relevant properties and transfer conditions are justified and the resulting claim is assessed against physical evidence. In the physics-to-mathematics direction, an admissible physical system may suggest conjectures, constructions, or counterexamples, but exact mathematical claims require rigorous justification beyond experimental observation. The framework distinguishes analogy from formal correspondence and discovery, and emphasizes admissible domains, preserved structure, information loss, realizability constraints, and validation. Illustrative thought experiments concern composition, interactions, and possible generalization; a companion study of passive analog networks provides a restricted setting in which physical realizability constrains mathematical transformations. PMT does not establish a universal physics–mathematics duality or a new physical law. Its contribution is a set of methodological criteria for evaluating whether particular cross-domain transformations yield insights beyond existing representations and techniques.
Physics–Mathematics Transformation research series — Paper 1
Related
- Integrated Institutional Transformation Theory (IITT): Toward an Institutional Theory for the Transformation of Primary Healthcare Centers Through the Tikena17 Conceptual Framework
- The Medium Changes the Outcome: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Transformation Across Physical, Computational, and Governance Systems
- Geometric Signatures of Conceptual Reorganization: A Counterfactual Embedding Framework for Detecting Scientific Revolutions
- An ODeL-based teacher professional development framework for teacher-facilitated human-AI collaboration in primary mathematics problem-solving: a conceptual analysis.
- Data-Rich But Integration-Poor Human Trials: Conceptual Framework for Closing the AI Transformation Gap in Dietary Intervention and Cosmetic Human Trials.
BibTeX
@misc{ghods2026physicsmathematics,
title = {{The Physics–Mathematics Transformation: A Conceptual Framework for Bidirectional Scientific Discovery}},
author = {Mohammad-Reza Ghods},
howpublished = {Zenodo},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23511877},
url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23511877},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - The Physics–Mathematics Transformation: A Conceptual Framework for Bidirectional Scientific Discovery
AU - Mohammad-Reza Ghods
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/20
PB - Zenodo
DO - 10.5281/zenodo.23511877
UR - https://zenodo.org/records/23511877
AB - Physics and mathematics are closely connected, but a shared formal description does not by itself establish an equivalence between physical and mathematical systems. This paper introduces the Physics–Mathematics Transformation (PMT) as a conceptual framework for investigating whether explicitly defined, restricted structural correspondences can facilitate discovery in either direction. In the mathematics-to-physics direction, a result obtained within a mathematical representation may yield a physical inference only when the relevant properties and transfer conditions are justified and the resulting claim is assessed against physical evidence. In the physics-to-mathematics direction, an admissible physical system may suggest conjectures, constructions, or counterexamples, but exact mathematical claims require rigorous justification beyond experimental observation. The framework distinguishes analogy from formal correspondence and discovery, and emphasizes admissible domains, preserved structure, information loss, realizability constraints, and validation. Illustrative thought experiments concern composition, interactions, and possible generalization; a companion study of passive analog networks provides a restricted setting in which physical realizability constrains mathematical transformations. PMT does not establish a universal physics–mathematics duality or a new physical law. Its contribution is a set of methodological criteria for evaluating whether particular cross-domain transformations yield insights beyond existing representations and techniques. Physics–Mathematics Transformation research series — Paper 1
ER -