Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 57 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Are habitable-zone TESS Objects of Interest really there? Period resolution from the full archive

Abstract

TESS Objects of Interest (TOIs) seen as single or duo transits carry a catalogue period that is undefined or equal to the separation of the two events, and their insolation and any habitable-zone label inherit it. We reanalyse all 187 TOIs catalogued with P = 0 or P >= 200 d using all public TESS data through Sector 107, with a flux-based method that weights each alias by per-epoch transit likelihoods, the transit duration and a geometric prior, and tests for coherence, data edges, contamination by other planets and instrumental artefacts. It recovers 12 published periods blindly and, in injection-recovery tests, 71 per cent of periods constrained by a new transit, with no wrong period. It resolves 28 periods and fixes 8 more by exclusion. Are habitable-zone TOIs really there? Mostly not: of the 28 duo-transits that a catalogue-period criterion places in the conservative habitable zone, about two are expected to lie there, both giants, and none of the 12 planet-sized ones; those resolved are aliases of hotter planets. Conversely, habitable-zone planets hide behind missing or wrong periods: we recover three published M-dwarf examples and validate four planets with new periods, including TOI-2298 b, a 3.0 Earth-radius sub-Neptune at 146.58 d in the conservative habitable zone of a K dwarf, and TOI-6075 b, a 1.7 Earth-radius planet at 416.5 d (833 d not excluded), the second validated transiting planet smaller than 2 Earth radii with P > 1 yr. We release alias-marginalised habitable-zone probabilities for the whole sample.

Related

  1. A search for photometric variability in planetary nebulae and related objects with the ROTSE-IIId archive
    N Aksaker
    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  2. SOPHIE and TESS characterization of fourteen TESS objects of interest: Nine planetary systems and five low-mass stellar companions
    N. Heidari, G. Hébrard, S. Sousa +61
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  3. Do little red dots really form a distinct class of astronomical objects?
    Jean-Baptiste Billand, D. Elbaz, Maximilien Franco +8
    Astronomy and AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY19 citedGalaxiesOpenAlex
  4. An Ultraviolet Instrument on the Habitable Worlds Observatory: Considerations and Capability Trades on the Multi-Object, Integral-field, and High-resolution modes of a potential UVI
    Brian Fleming, Kevin France, Dmitry Vorobiev +4
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  5. A design concept for the High Resolution Imager on the Habitable Worlds Observatory
    Vincent Van Eylen, Richard Massey, Alan Smith +15
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{navarrete2026habitablezone,
  title = {{Are habitable-zone TESS Objects of Interest really there? Period resolution from the full archive}},
  author = {Juan F. Pagés Navarrete},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.03019},
  eprint = {2611.03019},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03019},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Are habitable-zone TESS Objects of Interest really there? Period resolution from the full archive
AU  - Juan F. Pagés Navarrete
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.03019
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03019
AB  - TESS Objects of Interest (TOIs) seen as single or duo transits carry a catalogue period that is undefined or equal to the separation of the two events, and their insolation and any habitable-zone label inherit it. We reanalyse all 187 TOIs catalogued with P = 0 or P >= 200 d using all public TESS data through Sector 107, with a flux-based method that weights each alias by per-epoch transit likelihoods, the transit duration and a geometric prior, and tests for coherence, data edges, contamination by other planets and instrumental artefacts. It recovers 12 published periods blindly and, in injection-recovery tests, 71 per cent of periods constrained by a new transit, with no wrong period. It resolves 28 periods and fixes 8 more by exclusion. Are habitable-zone TOIs really there? Mostly not: of the 28 duo-transits that a catalogue-period criterion places in the conservative habitable zone, about two are expected to lie there, both giants, and none of the 12 planet-sized ones; those resolved are aliases of hotter planets. Conversely, habitable-zone planets hide behind missing or wrong periods: we recover three published M-dwarf examples and validate four planets with new periods, including TOI-2298 b, a 3.0 Earth-radius sub-Neptune at 146.58 d in the conservative habitable zone of a K dwarf, and TOI-6075 b, a 1.7 Earth-radius planet at 416.5 d (833 d not excluded), the second validated transiting planet smaller than 2 Earth radii with P > 1 yr. We release alias-marginalised habitable-zone probabilities for the whole sample.
ER  -