PreprintAll rights reservedmedRxiv
Pulsed Field Versus Radiofrequency Ablation For Repeat Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Evaluation of Outcomes
- 1University of Colorado Denver
Related
- Electrophysiology Team-Administered Conscious Sedation for Pulsed-Field Versus Radiofrequency Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation.
- Dual-Energy Pulsed Field and Radiofrequency Ablation With a Contact Force-Sensing Focal Catheter for Ventricular Arrhythmias: Initial Clinical Experience
- Impact of obesity on procedural safety and 1-year outcomes after pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation
- Predictive Value of Left Atrial Strain Combined with Low-Voltage Substrate for Recurrence After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
- Radiofrequency ablation with a conventional solid tip catheter in contact with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator coil causing inadvertent ventricular fibrillation.
BibTeX
@misc{patel2026pulsed,
title = {{Pulsed Field Versus Radiofrequency Ablation For Repeat Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Evaluation of Outcomes}},
author = {V. Patel and C. Ashur and J. Adewumi and K. Padalia and M. Zipse and A. Tumolo and L. Garg and R. Sabzwari and A. Sandhu and M. A. Rosenberg and W. S. Tzou},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.08.26365096},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.08.26365096v1},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Pulsed Field Versus Radiofrequency Ablation For Repeat Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Evaluation of Outcomes
AU - V. Patel
AU - C. Ashur
AU - J. Adewumi
AU - K. Padalia
AU - M. Zipse
AU - A. Tumolo
AU - L. Garg
AU - R. Sabzwari
AU - A. Sandhu
AU - M. A. Rosenberg
AU - W. S. Tzou
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/08
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.08.26365096
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.08.26365096v1
ER -