Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Quantum State Search with Classical Interactive Advice

Abstract

We study whether a quantum verifier can find a hidden quantum state by exchanging classical messages with an unbounded prover who knows the state. The verifier has access to a reflection oracle about the target. For a Haar-random n-qubit target, we prove that achieving constant average fidelity with the target requires (q+1)2(B+1)=Ω(2n), where q is the number of verifier queries and B is the total prover-to-verifier communication. The bound allows arbitrary classical interaction and unrestricted computation between queries. Our proof extends the lower bound of Aaronson and Kuperberg (ToC'07) from a single classical proof to an arbitrary classical interaction. As a result, we obtain a quantum-oracle separation of QMA from QCIP. In particular, we give a unitary oracle 𝒰 such that there exists a language L∈QMA𝒰 but L∉QCIP𝒰. Our separation holds even for UniqueQMA, the restriction of QMA to verification with a unique quantum witness, which is known to be strictly weaker than QMA in the quantum black-box setting. We further give an oracle construction for a notion known as QMA--QCIP[2] gap problem. This gives average case hardness for a QMA language under classical access to a QCIP[2] decision oracle and is used in establishing negative results on witness encryption and quantum indistinguishability obfuscation.

Related

  1. EasyHybrid: An Interactive Graphical Environment for Quantum, Classical and Hybrid Simulations with pDynamo3
    José Fernando Ruggiero Bachega, Gustavo Hagen, Carlos Sequeiros-Borja +4
    Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textAtomic, molecular & optical physicsHAL
  2. Quantum-classical algorithm interpolation for spatial search
    Diogo Ramos, Duarte Magano
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Towards Efficient Function Optimisation with Quantum–Classical Hybrid Search
    Mansur Ziiatdinov, Fedor Levkovich-Maslyuk, Emmanuel M. Pothos
    Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral astronomyGeneral physicsEurope PMCDOAJ
  4. A Spectrum-Based Converse for Quantum State Discrimination and Its Applications to Classical-Quantum Channel Coding
    Tam{á}s Havas, Hsuan-Yin Lin, Eirik Rosnes
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Persistent State Method for Resonances on Classical and Quantum Computers
    Cong-Wu Wang, Lukas Bovermann, Evgeny Epelbaum +4
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy & particle physicsNuclear physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{barhoush2026quantum,
  title = {{Quantum State Search with Classical Interactive Advice}},
  author = {Mohammed Barhoush},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.25657},
  eprint = {2610.25657},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25657},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Quantum State Search with Classical Interactive Advice
AU  - Mohammed Barhoush
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.25657
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25657
AB  - We study whether a quantum verifier can find a hidden quantum state by exchanging classical messages with an unbounded prover who knows the state. The verifier has access to a reflection oracle about the target. For a Haar-random n-qubit target, we prove that achieving constant average fidelity with the target requires (q+1)^2(B+1)=Ω(2^n), where q is the number of verifier queries and B is the total prover-to-verifier communication. The bound allows arbitrary classical interaction and unrestricted computation between queries. Our proof extends the lower bound of Aaronson and Kuperberg (ToC'07) from a single classical proof to an arbitrary classical interaction. As a result, we obtain a quantum-oracle separation of QMA from QCIP. In particular, we give a unitary oracle 𝒰 such that there exists a language L∈QMA^𝒰 but L∉QCIP^𝒰. Our separation holds even for UniqueQMA, the restriction of QMA to verification with a unique quantum witness, which is known to be strictly weaker than QMA in the quantum black-box setting. We further give an oracle construction for a notion known as QMA--QCIP[2] gap problem. This gives average case hardness for a QMA language under classical access to a QCIP[2] decision oracle and is used in establishing negative results on witness encryption and quantum indistinguishability obfuscation.
ER  -