Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology

Machine Learning‐Based Classification of Right and Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Premature Ventricular Contractions

  1. 1First Department of Cardiology “Hippokration” Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University Athens Greece
  2. 2Athens Heart Center Athens Medical Center Athens Greece
  3. 3Biomedical Engineering Laboratory, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering National Technical University of Athens Zografou Greece

Abstract

Introduction: Idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) commonly originate from the right and left ventricular outflow tracts (RVOT and LVOT). The surface 12‐lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is commonly used to differentiate the anatomic site of origin prior to catheter ablation. Machine learning methods can further enhance diagnostic accuracy.

Materials and Methods: In this study, 64 ECG‐derived features, along with age and gender, were analyzed from 43 patients (65% males, median age 55.6, IQR 30 years), who underwent successful catheter ablation of outflow tract‐originating idiopathic PVCs. The site of origin was depicted through 3‐D electroanatomical mapping. A logistic regression model was trained to classify the site of origin as either RVOT or LVOT using repeated stratified five‐fold cross‐validation with five repeats. A model restricted to ECG features and four previously published ECG algorithms was evaluated for comparison.

Results: Across the 25 held‐out partitions, the model achieved an accuracy of 0.817 ± 0.143, precision of 0.888 ± 0.122, recall of 0.824 ± 0.206, F1‐score of 0.836 ± 0.139 and ROC‐AUC of 0.917 ± 0.094. Using the pooled out‐of‐fold predictions, accuracy was 0.860 (95% CI 0.744–0.953) and ROC‐AUC 0.910 (95% CI 0.800–0.987). Age was the most discriminative feature, with increasing values favoring LVOT origin. The ECG‐only model achieved an ROC‐AUC of 0.853 (95% CI 0.721–0.958; ΔAUC +0.057, p = 0.104).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that machine learning models, based on ECG parameters and demographic characteristics, can classify outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias, supporting their use in automated differentiation and pre‐procedural planning.

Related

  1. Premature ventricular contractions: pathophysiology, prognostic impact, and management.
    Raffaele Scorza, Pasquale Santangeli
    European heart journal openPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  2. Advancing Heart Failure Classification Beyond Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Unsupervised Machine Learning Insights From the Japanese Nationwide Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Cohort: JROADHF
    Atsushi Kyodo, Yasuki Nakada, Kazutaka Nogi +7
    Journal of the American Heart AssociationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDCardiovascular medicineCrossref
  3. Curriculum-Based Deep Learning for Automated Segmental Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Classification Using Short-Axis Echocardiography
    Rajeswari Periyasamy, Srinivasan Selvaraj, Francis Antony Selvi Pitchaimuthu +1
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Transcatheter suture embolization for ventricular premature beats originating from the distal great cardiac vein: A case report.
    Shen Huang, Xiuyu Wang, Chunwei Zhang +1
    HeartRhythm case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  5. Heart Failure Progression in the Setting of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, Frequent Premature Ventricular Complexes, and Malignancy-Related Limitations to Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy: A Case Report.
    Douni Roger, Waleed Shaker, Majid Yavari +4
    Clinical case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{botis2026machine,
  title = {{Machine Learning‐Based Classification of Right and Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Premature Ventricular Contractions}},
  author = {Michail Botis and Dimitris Tsiachris and George G. Botis and Aristomenis Koumpanakis and Lamprini Iro Bartsioka and Ioannis Doundoulakis and Athanasios Kordalis and Christos‐Konstantinos Antoniou and Aikaterini‐Eleftheria Karanikola and George K. Matsopoulos and Konstantinos Tsioufis},
  journal = {Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1111/anec.70250},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.70250},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Machine Learning‐Based Classification of Right and Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Premature Ventricular Contractions
AU  - Michail Botis
AU  - Dimitris Tsiachris
AU  - George G. Botis
AU  - Aristomenis Koumpanakis
AU  - Lamprini Iro Bartsioka
AU  - Ioannis Doundoulakis
AU  - Athanasios Kordalis
AU  - Christos‐Konstantinos Antoniou
AU  - Aikaterini‐Eleftheria Karanikola
AU  - George K. Matsopoulos
AU  - Konstantinos Tsioufis
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology
DO  - 10.1111/anec.70250
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.70250
AB  - Introduction: Idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) commonly originate from the right and left ventricular outflow tracts (RVOT and LVOT). The surface 12‐lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is commonly used to differentiate the anatomic site of origin prior to catheter ablation. Machine learning methods can further enhance diagnostic accuracy.  Materials and Methods: In this study, 64 ECG‐derived features, along with age and gender, were analyzed from 43 patients (65% males, median age 55.6, IQR 30 years), who underwent successful catheter ablation of outflow tract‐originating idiopathic PVCs. The site of origin was depicted through 3‐D electroanatomical mapping. A logistic regression model was trained to classify the site of origin as either RVOT or LVOT using repeated stratified five‐fold cross‐validation with five repeats. A model restricted to ECG features and four previously published ECG algorithms was evaluated for comparison.  Results: Across the 25 held‐out partitions, the model achieved an accuracy of 0.817 ± 0.143, precision of 0.888 ± 0.122, recall of 0.824 ± 0.206, F1‐score of 0.836 ± 0.139 and ROC‐AUC of 0.917 ± 0.094. Using the pooled out‐of‐fold predictions, accuracy was 0.860 (95% CI 0.744–0.953) and ROC‐AUC 0.910 (95% CI 0.800–0.987). Age was the most discriminative feature, with increasing values favoring LVOT origin. The ECG‐only model achieved an ROC‐AUC of 0.853 (95% CI 0.721–0.958; ΔAUC +0.057, p = 0.104).  Conclusions: These findings suggest that machine learning models, based on ECG parameters and demographic characteristics, can classify outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias, supporting their use in automated differentiation and pre‐procedural planning.
SN  - 1082-720X
SN  - 1542-474X
ER  -