Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo

Resolution of the Negative Initial Velocity and Parallel Universe Problems in Non-Equilibrium Dynamics: v0 = 0, Reproduction of Radiation and Inflation Eras, Cosmic Age Discrepancy, and the Universal Prediction q0 = 1/2

Abstract

We show that setting the initial velocity to zero, v0 = 0, resolves two problems in Non-

Equilibrium Dynamics (NED): the negative initial velocity problem and the parallel universe

problem. With v0 = 0, the exact solution reduces to

2R

3 − 3ℓpR

2 = 3Kt2 + 4ℓ

3

p

,

which has only one branch and one bounce at t = 0. This eliminates the need for v0 <

0 and the associated parallel universe interpretation. We then show that this equation

may reproduce the radiation and inflation eras without invoking R &prop; t

1/2 or exponential

expansion:

&bull; At the end of inflation (t &sim; 10−32 s), R &asymp; 1.79 × 10−7 m, giving R/(2ℓp) &asymp; 5.5 × 1027

,

comparable to or larger than the standard inflation factor e

60 &asymp; 1026

.

&bull; At the end of the radiation era (t &sim; 5 × 104 years), R &asymp; 5.2 × 1022 m, comparable to

the standard value.

We discuss the cosmic age discrepancy: the NED prediction with v0 = 0 is tnow &asymp; 6.74 ×

109 years, whereas the standard Friedman cosmology gives tnow &asymp; 1.38 × 1010 years. We

propose that this discrepancy may arise from the different theoretical frameworks: NED

predicts decelerating expansion and a finite asymptotic future, while Friedman cosmology

with dark energy predicts accelerating expansion and an infinite future. Finally, we derive

the deceleration parameter

q0 =

1

2

,

which is independent of v0. This is a universal prediction of NED, in direct conflict with

the observed value q0 &asymp; −0.55. The prediction q0 = +1/2 provides a decisive falsifiable test

of NED.

Related

  1. Ultra-low background radiation and reproduction/development: biological homeostasis, developmental sensitivity, and emerging radiobiological questions
    Shiqi Bian, Yiyao Wu, Xuehong Wan +1
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMedical imaging & radiologyCrossrefPMC
  2. Hilbert Expansion of the coupled radiation-Euler in the equilibrium regime
    Qiangchang Ju, Lei Li, Zhengce Zhang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  3. Kinetic Equilibrium between SIMP Dark Matter and Radiation via Internal Bremsstrahlung
    Xiaoyong Chu, Ajay Kaladharan, Yassine El Mohtadi
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  4. Machine learning simulation for radiation effects on MoS₂-Al₂O₃ hybrid nanoliquid with local thermal non-equilibrium conditions.
    Mohamad Amin Khadimalah, Elimem Ali, Joffin J Ponnore +3
    MethodsXPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEurope PMC
  5. Unified Description of Inflation, Radiation Era, and Cosmic Age in Non-Equilibrium Dynamics: F0 = 7Mpc 2/(2ℓp), R ∝ t 2/3 , and the Mnow–Rnow Relation
    takashi ueda
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
BibTeX
@misc{ueda2026resolution,
  title = {{Resolution of the Negative Initial Velocity and Parallel Universe Problems in Non-Equilibrium Dynamics: v0 = 0, Reproduction of Radiation and Inflation Eras, Cosmic Age Discrepancy, and the Universal Prediction q0 = 1/2}},
  author = {takashi ueda},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23528795},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23528795},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Resolution of the Negative Initial Velocity and Parallel Universe Problems in Non-Equilibrium Dynamics: v0 = 0, Reproduction of Radiation and Inflation Eras, Cosmic Age Discrepancy, and the Universal Prediction q0 = 1/2
AU  - takashi ueda
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
PB  - Zenodo
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23528795
UR  - https://zenodo.org/records/23528795
AB  - We show that setting the initial velocity to zero, v0 = 0, resolves two problems in Non-  Equilibrium Dynamics (NED): the negative initial velocity problem and the parallel universe  problem. With v0 = 0, the exact solution reduces to  2R  3 − 3ℓpR  2 = 3Kt2 + 4ℓ  3  p  ,  which has only one branch and one bounce at t = 0. This eliminates the need for v0 <  0 and the associated parallel universe interpretation. We then show that this equation  may reproduce the radiation and inflation eras without invoking R &prop; t  1/2 or exponential  expansion:  &bull; At the end of inflation (t &sim; 10−32 s), R &asymp; 1.79 × 10−7 m, giving R/(2ℓp) &asymp; 5.5 × 1027  ,  comparable to or larger than the standard inflation factor e  60 &asymp; 1026  .  &bull; At the end of the radiation era (t &sim; 5 × 104 years), R &asymp; 5.2 × 1022 m, comparable to  the standard value.  We discuss the cosmic age discrepancy: the NED prediction with v0 = 0 is tnow &asymp; 6.74 ×  109 years, whereas the standard Friedman cosmology gives tnow &asymp; 1.38 × 1010 years. We  propose that this discrepancy may arise from the different theoretical frameworks: NED  predicts decelerating expansion and a finite asymptotic future, while Friedman cosmology  with dark energy predicts accelerating expansion and an infinite future. Finally, we derive  the deceleration parameter  q0 =  1  2  ,  which is independent of v0. This is a universal prediction of NED, in direct conflict with  the observed value q0 &asymp; −0.55. The prediction q0 = +1/2 provides a decisive falsifiable test  of NED.
ER  -