Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Second-order perturbation bounds for Gibbs samplers under strong spatial mixing

Abstract

The basic question in perturbation analysis of Markov chains is how small changes in their transition kernels affect their stationary distributions. Classical perturbation bounds typically require the kernel error to be much smaller than 1/τ, where τ is a mixing or relaxation time. Although this scaling is sharp for Markov chains in general, we investigate a general "square-rooting" phenomenon in which one-step errors of order roughly 1/√τ can be sufficient for local updates. We proved a form of this phenomenon in Lin, Liu and Smith (2025) under strong assumptions. Here we substantially weaken these assumptions, and prove this phenomenon occurs using three distinct approaches. First, block factorization applies under structural assumptions on the stationary measures of both chains. Second, approximate block-update arguments extend the result to statistically relevant Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) settings, where structural guarantees are available for the exact posterior and its associated sampler, but not for the perturbed posterior. Third, we use direct calculations for a class of models with hard constraints where neither general result is directly available. We illustrate these results in three MCMC settings and show how they directly inform the tuning of approximate MCMC algorithms.

Related

  1. Rényi mixing bounds for kinetic samplers via L2 hypocoercivity
    Jianfeng Lu, Yinchen Luo
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textProbabilityarXiv
  2. M-Eigenpairs of Partially Symmetric Tensors: Exact Reformulation and Perturbation Bounds
    Zhuolin Du, Hanxin Liu, Yisheng Song
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. A low-rank decoder bottleneck bounds reliability in foundation-model perturbation prediction
    Zheyu Zhang, Yuanhao Huang, Fan Feng +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textBioinformatics & computational biologyStatisticsarXiv
  4. Regional Stability and New Eigenvalue Perturbation Bounds
    Phuc Tran, Van Vu
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingProbabilityarXiv
  5. The second type of power mean bounds for the hypergeometric mean
    Zhen-Hang Yang, Jing-Feng Tian
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{lin2026secondorder,
  title = {{Second-order perturbation bounds for Gibbs samplers under strong spatial mixing}},
  author = {Na Lin and Aaron Smith and Yiqiang Q. Zhao},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.13495},
  eprint = {2609.13495},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13495},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Second-order perturbation bounds for Gibbs samplers under strong spatial mixing
AU  - Na Lin
AU  - Aaron Smith
AU  - Yiqiang Q. Zhao
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.13495
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13495
AB  - The basic question in perturbation analysis of Markov chains is how small changes in their transition kernels affect their stationary distributions. Classical perturbation bounds typically require the kernel error to be much smaller than 1/τ, where τ is a mixing or relaxation time. Although this scaling is sharp for Markov chains in general, we investigate a general "square-rooting" phenomenon in which one-step errors of order roughly 1/√τ can be sufficient for local updates. We proved a form of this phenomenon in Lin, Liu and Smith (2025) under strong assumptions. Here we substantially weaken these assumptions, and prove this phenomenon occurs using three distinct approaches. First, block factorization applies under structural assumptions on the stationary measures of both chains. Second, approximate block-update arguments extend the result to statistically relevant Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) settings, where structural guarantees are available for the exact posterior and its associated sampler, but not for the perturbed posterior. Third, we use direct calculations for a class of models with hard constraints where neither general result is directly available. We illustrate these results in three MCMC settings and show how they directly inform the tuning of approximate MCMC algorithms.
ER  -