Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Sample-Size Extrapolation in Simulation-Based Inference via Statistical Scaling

Abstract

In simulation-based inference (SBI), neural posterior estimators trained on a bounded range of sample sizes can become inaccurate on larger datasets because their parameterizations do not specify how posterior location, uncertainty and shape must change as observations accumulate. We propose center-estimated NPE (CE-NPE), which combines a statistical center with an explicit contraction rate and learns a local center correction and residual densities in posterior-scale coordinates. The center is a statistical estimate, such as a closed-form statistic or a simulator-based moment match, which does not require an evaluable likelihood. Our analysis explains how contraction amplifies center error and decomposes Gaussian posterior error into shape, mean and covariance contributions. On six regular benchmarks, CE-NPE gives the best reference-posterior agreement of all tested amortized estimators at every out-of-range size, up to five times the largest training size, without retraining; it also fits better within the training range on most of them. Matched controls and nonregular examples characterize the scope of these gains and identify the conditions on which they depend: an appropriate contraction rate, an accurate center, and a stable residual representation.

Related

  1. Semiparametrically efficient semi-supervised statistical inference
    Zichun Xu, Daniela Witten, Ali Shojaie
    BiometrikaPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text32 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  2. Statistical inference and applications of Kumaraswamy Odd Perks power Lomax distribution
    Aleena Thampi, Vasili B. V. Nagarjuna
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textStatisticsCrossref
  3. Statistical inference for low-rank tensors: Heteroskedasticity, subgaussianity, and applications
    Joshua Agterberg, Anru R. Zhang
    The Annals of StatisticsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text10 citedNumerical analysis & scientific computingOpenAlex
  4. An Efficient Monte Carlo Method for Valid Prior-Free Possibilistic Statistical Inference
    Ryan Martin
    Journal of the American Statistical AssociationPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text12 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  5. A statistical theory for blind denoising: minimax estimation of the noise level from a single sample
    Zhuoer Shen
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{sun2026samplesize,
  title = {{Sample-Size Extrapolation in Simulation-Based Inference via Statistical Scaling}},
  author = {Shiyi Sun and Lei Fang and Geoff K Nicholls},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.16820},
  eprint = {2610.16820},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16820},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Sample-Size Extrapolation in Simulation-Based Inference via Statistical Scaling
AU  - Shiyi Sun
AU  - Lei Fang
AU  - Geoff K Nicholls
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.16820
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16820
AB  - In simulation-based inference (SBI), neural posterior estimators trained on a bounded range of sample sizes can become inaccurate on larger datasets because their parameterizations do not specify how posterior location, uncertainty and shape must change as observations accumulate. We propose center-estimated NPE (CE-NPE), which combines a statistical center with an explicit contraction rate and learns a local center correction and residual densities in posterior-scale coordinates. The center is a statistical estimate, such as a closed-form statistic or a simulator-based moment match, which does not require an evaluable likelihood. Our analysis explains how contraction amplifies center error and decomposes Gaussian posterior error into shape, mean and covariance contributions. On six regular benchmarks, CE-NPE gives the best reference-posterior agreement of all tested amortized estimators at every out-of-range size, up to five times the largest training size, without retraining; it also fits better within the training range on most of them. Matched controls and nonregular examples characterize the scope of these gains and identify the conditions on which they depend: an appropriate contraction rate, an accurate center, and a stable residual representation.
ER  -