Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,357 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
PreprintCC BY-SA 4.0arXiv

A literature-guided descriptor-based framework for filtering composition search spaces

Abstract

Scientific literature contains latent knowledge about materials behavior, but much of this knowledge is expressed through words, contexts, and recurring associations rather than explicit design principles. This raises a central question: how can large-scale scientific corpora be used for practical problems in materials discovery? Here, we present a literature-guided descriptor-based filtering framework for reducing composition search spaces. For a given performance metric, the framework selects two descriptors from a filtered vocabulary in a literature-trained word embedding model and uses the selected descriptors to construct a Pareto-based filter for candidate compositions. Across the evaluated performance metrics and composition search spaces, the framework filters out an average of 74.27\% of the candidate compositions, with an average best-value error of 1.93\% relative to experimental measurements. Compared with expert-chosen and random descriptors, our performance metric-dependent descriptors provide a more controlled balance between retained fraction and best-value error. These results show that literature-derived embeddings can support intuitive and reproducible filters for narrowing candidate composition spaces while preserving high-performing compositions.

Related

  1. An Open-Source Data Infrastructure for Alloy Synthesis Research: Stage 1 --- Composition Screening and Literature Cross-Referencing
    Iliya Angelov Radulov
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
  2. Agentic schema-guided extraction of materials process knowledge from scientific literature
    Sameer Sadruddin, Jennifer D'Souza
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
  3. Information limits of photonic lantern wavefront sensing: a Fisher- and quantum-Fisher-information framework and its relation to Fourier-filtering sensitivity limits
    Kalaga Madhav
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textInstrumentation & methodsOptics & photonicsarXiv
  4. SVD-guided hybrid optimization framework for ab initio aspheric optical design
    Tuo Sun, Wenguan Zhang, Xiangang Gao +8
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedPublisher termsOptics & photonicsCrossref
  5. ERAF4XRD: A multimodal agentic framework for constructing validated experimental X-ray diffraction databases from scientific literature
    Afnan Mostafa, William Ratcliff, Simon J. L. Billinge +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{zhang2026literatureguided,
  title = {{A literature-guided descriptor-based framework for filtering composition search spaces}},
  author = {Lei Zhang and Markus Stricker},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.31650},
  eprint = {2609.31650},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31650},
  note = {CC BY-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A literature-guided descriptor-based framework for filtering composition search spaces
AU  - Lei Zhang
AU  - Markus Stricker
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/14
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.31650
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31650
AB  - Scientific literature contains latent knowledge about materials behavior, but much of this knowledge is expressed through words, contexts, and recurring associations rather than explicit design principles. This raises a central question: how can large-scale scientific corpora be used for practical problems in materials discovery? Here, we present a literature-guided descriptor-based filtering framework for reducing composition search spaces. For a given performance metric, the framework selects two descriptors from a filtered vocabulary in a literature-trained word embedding model and uses the selected descriptors to construct a Pareto-based filter for candidate compositions. Across the evaluated performance metrics and composition search spaces, the framework filters out an average of 74.27\% of the candidate compositions, with an average best-value error of 1.93\% relative to experimental measurements. Compared with expert-chosen and random descriptors, our performance metric-dependent descriptors provide a more controlled balance between retained fraction and best-value error. These results show that literature-derived embeddings can support intuitive and reproducible filters for narrowing candidate composition spaces while preserving high-performing compositions.
ER  -