Coexistence of annual plants under competition and reproductive interference
- 1Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology
Abstract
In natural ecosystems, community dynamics are driven by diverse interactions operating through both ecological and reproductive processes. Although theory predicts that these processes jointly generate complex and contingent dynamics through the interplay of stabilizing (negative frequency dependence arising from niche differences) and destabilizing effects (positive frequency dependence caused by reproductive interference), empirical tests of this prediction remain scarce. Here, we combined experimental and theoretical approaches to investigate the dynamics of two congeneric annual plant species (Commelina) experiencing both ecological competition and reproductive interference. Our empirically parameterized model revealed a large niche difference and mutual reproductive interference. However, the reproductive interference was not strong enough to generate pronounced contingency of community dynamics on initial conditions. Instead, coexistence was the most likely outcome regardless of initial species composition. Parameter exploration indicated that the weak contingency arose because reproductive assurance strategies of Commelina species buffered the minority disadvantage caused by reproductive interference. These findings provide empirical evidence that reproductive interference does not necessarily destabilize coexistence and that it may be outweighed by ecological niche and fitness differences. Our study highlights the importance of integrating ecological and reproductive processes towards better prediction of community dynamics.
Related
- Experimental evolution in sympatry leads to higher growth rates, but does not alleviate the costs of competition and reproductive interference
- Linking plant-soil feedback with resource competition to understand plant coexistence
- Reproductive isolation emerges from coordinated barriers during mating system divergence in plants
- Interference competition influences virulence in Metarhizium coinfections
- Comparing apples and oranges (and pinecones): understanding patterns of reproductive disparity across seed plants.
BibTeX
@misc{shinohara2026coexistence,
title = {{Coexistence of annual plants under competition and reproductive interference}},
author = {N. Shinohara and A. Yamawo and K. Katsuhara},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.30.755560},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.30.755560v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Coexistence of annual plants under competition and reproductive interference
AU - N. Shinohara
AU - A. Yamawo
AU - K. Katsuhara
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/30
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.30.755560
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.30.755560v1
AB - In natural ecosystems, community dynamics are driven by diverse interactions operating through both ecological and reproductive processes. Although theory predicts that these processes jointly generate complex and contingent dynamics through the interplay of stabilizing (negative frequency dependence arising from niche differences) and destabilizing effects (positive frequency dependence caused by reproductive interference), empirical tests of this prediction remain scarce. Here, we combined experimental and theoretical approaches to investigate the dynamics of two congeneric annual plant species (Commelina) experiencing both ecological competition and reproductive interference. Our empirically parameterized model revealed a large niche difference and mutual reproductive interference. However, the reproductive interference was not strong enough to generate pronounced contingency of community dynamics on initial conditions. Instead, coexistence was the most likely outcome regardless of initial species composition. Parameter exploration indicated that the weak contingency arose because reproductive assurance strategies of Commelina species buffered the minority disadvantage caused by reproductive interference. These findings provide empirical evidence that reproductive interference does not necessarily destabilize coexistence and that it may be outweighed by ecological niche and fitness differences. Our study highlights the importance of integrating ecological and reproductive processes towards better prediction of community dynamics.
ER -