Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

A Computer-Assisted Proof of Speed Monotonicity for the Biased Random Walk on a Galton-Watson Tree Beyond the Known Range

Abstract

The speed v(lambda) of the lambda-biased random walk on a supercritical Galton-Watson tree without leaves is conjectured to be nonincreasing on [0,m), where m is the mean offspring. For non-constant offspring, monotonicity is known only for small bias: lambda <= 1/1160, lambda <= 1/2, and, when every vertex has at least m_1 >= 2 children, lambda <= m_1/(1+sqrt(1-1/m_1)). For offspring uniform on {2,3} (m=2.5) the last bound is 2/(1+sqrt(1/2)) = 1.17157... We prove, with computer assistance, that v is strictly decreasing on [0,1.755] for this law. The proof has three parts. Aidekon's speed formula gives v=(R-lambda)/(R+lambda) for an explicit functional R, so v decreases exactly when R/lambda does; we compare R/lambda at two biases directly, which avoids differentiating the conductance. A pathwise Lipschitz bound on the conductance in lambda turns that comparison into an inequality between expectations of explicit functions. A monotone sandwich of discretised laws gives two-sided bounds on the conductance law, and each lambda-cell is verified with exact rational arithmetic on top of bounded floating-point error; an independent interval-arithmetic implementation re-certifies five cells, including the one that sets the endpoint. The method stops where the crude Lipschitz bound becomes too weak; sharper control of the derivative of the conductance is what the full range needs. Code and certificates are public.

Related

  1. Biased random walk on a locally infinite Galton-Watson tree
    Jan Nagel
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityarXiv
  2. Infinite-mean Galton-Watson trees have zero random-interchange threshold
    Andreas Klippel, Benjamin Lees, Christian Mönch
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textMathematical physicsProbabilityarXiv
  3. Branching Random Walks on Multi-Type Galton–Watson Trees: A Multifractal Analysis
    Najmeddine Attia, Mohammed Balegh
    Fractal and FractionalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Mathematical physicsCrossref
  4. On non-monotonicity of logarithmic energy for random matrices
    Theodoros Assiotis
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textMathematical physicsProbabilityarXiv
  5. On the monotonicity of average singular values of complex Gaussian random matrices
    Jnaneshwar Baslingker, Biltu Dan
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{mandarapu2026computerassisted,
  title = {{A Computer-Assisted Proof of Speed Monotonicity for the Biased Random Walk on a Galton-Watson Tree Beyond the Known Range}},
  author = {Madhulatha Mandarapu and Sandeep Kunkunuru},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.29894},
  eprint = {2609.29894},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29894},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A Computer-Assisted Proof of Speed Monotonicity for the Biased Random Walk on a Galton-Watson Tree Beyond the Known Range
AU  - Madhulatha Mandarapu
AU  - Sandeep Kunkunuru
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.29894
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29894
AB  - The speed v(lambda) of the lambda-biased random walk on a supercritical Galton-Watson tree without leaves is conjectured to be nonincreasing on [0,m), where m is the mean offspring. For non-constant offspring, monotonicity is known only for small bias: lambda <= 1/1160, lambda <= 1/2, and, when every vertex has at least m_1 >= 2 children, lambda <= m_1/(1+sqrt(1-1/m_1)). For offspring uniform on {2,3} (m=2.5) the last bound is 2/(1+sqrt(1/2)) = 1.17157... We prove, with computer assistance, that v is strictly decreasing on [0,1.755] for this law. The proof has three parts. Aidekon's speed formula gives v=(R-lambda)/(R+lambda) for an explicit functional R, so v decreases exactly when R/lambda does; we compare R/lambda at two biases directly, which avoids differentiating the conductance. A pathwise Lipschitz bound on the conductance in lambda turns that comparison into an inequality between expectations of explicit functions. A monotone sandwich of discretised laws gives two-sided bounds on the conductance law, and each lambda-cell is verified with exact rational arithmetic on top of bounded floating-point error; an independent interval-arithmetic implementation re-certifies five cells, including the one that sets the endpoint. The method stops where the crude Lipschitz bound becomes too weak; sharper control of the derivative of the conductance is what the full range needs. Code and certificates are public.
ER  -