Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,642 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

When Are Monomial Symmetric Polynomials Hard?

Abstract

For a partition λ = (λ1,…,λr) and n≥ r, the monomial symmetric polynomial is defined as mλ(x1,…,xn) := ∑ xi1λ1 xi2λ2 ⋯ xirλr, where the sum ranges over all distinct monomials obtained by assigning the parts of λ to pairwise distinct variables. We establish an almost-complete dichotomy for the complexity of the monomial symmetric polynomials mλ: If a family of partitions contains polynomially many distinct parts, then the corresponding monomial symmetric polynomials (on sufficiently many variables) are VNP-complete. If the number of distinct parts is constant, the family admits polynomial-size circuits. Thus the only remaining gap concerns the intermediate regime where the number of distinct parts grows subpolynomially. As part of our proof, we use combinatorial properties of matching polynomials to establish VNP-hardness of the perfect matching polynomial for blow-up graphs; these are graphs with non-generic edge-weights that are obtained by "blowing up" a smaller graph. We reduce these matching polynomials to monomial-symmetric polynomials by combining classical techniques from algebraic complexity theory with structural properties of Sidon sets.

Related

  1. Collision Positivity for Three-Variable Symmetric Monomial Inequalities
    Jian Sun
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  2. Cyclotomy of symmetric polynomials
    Laura De Carli, Maurizio Laporta
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  3. Degree-one Pieri rule for non-symmetric Jack polynomials
    Waldeck Schutzer
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  4. Power sums of critical points of gap polynomials for symmetric and pseudo-symmetric numerical semigroups
    Pavel Grinfeld
    arXivPreprintCC0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  5. Time-and-band limiting for symmetric classical Dunkl orthogonal polynomials
    M. M. Castro, F. A. Grünbaum
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{blaser2026when,
  title = {{When Are Monomial Symmetric Polynomials Hard?}},
  author = {Markus Bläser and Radu Curticapean and Sagnik Dutta and Gorav Jindal},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.25181},
  eprint = {2610.25181},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25181},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - When Are Monomial Symmetric Polynomials Hard?
AU  - Markus Bläser
AU  - Radu Curticapean
AU  - Sagnik Dutta
AU  - Gorav Jindal
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/18
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.25181
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25181
AB  - For a partition λ = (λ_1,…,λ_r) and n≥ r, the monomial symmetric polynomial is defined as m_λ(x_1,…,x_n) := ∑ x_i_1^λ_1 x_i_2^λ_2 ⋯ x_i_r^λ_r, where the sum ranges over all distinct monomials obtained by assigning the parts of λ to pairwise distinct variables. We establish an almost-complete dichotomy for the complexity of the monomial symmetric polynomials m_λ: If a family of partitions contains polynomially many distinct parts, then the corresponding monomial symmetric polynomials (on sufficiently many variables) are VNP-complete. If the number of distinct parts is constant, the family admits polynomial-size circuits. Thus the only remaining gap concerns the intermediate regime where the number of distinct parts grows subpolynomially. As part of our proof, we use combinatorial properties of matching polynomials to establish VNP-hardness of the perfect matching polynomial for blow-up graphs; these are graphs with non-generic edge-weights that are obtained by "blowing up" a smaller graph. We reduce these matching polynomials to monomial-symmetric polynomials by combining classical techniques from algebraic complexity theory with structural properties of Sidon sets.
ER  -