Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0The Australian Journal of Rural Health

Supporting Concerned Significant Others of People Who Use Substances in Rural Australia: A Qualitative Study of Barriers, Enablers and Service Preferences

5 affiliations
  1. 1Rural Health Research Institute Charles Sturt University Bathurst New South Wales Australia
  2. 2School of Psychology Charles Sturt University Bathurst New South Wales Australia
  3. 3Marathon Health Bathurst New South Wales Australia
  4. 4Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health University of NSW Randwick New South Wales Australia
  5. 5National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre University of NSW Randwick New South Wales Australia

Abstract

Objective: Problematic substance use can significantly affect the wellbeing of family members and friends (hereafter concerned significant others—CSOs). Despite the substantial burden they experience, CSOs face multiple barriers when seeking support for themselves. Further, limited research has explored what CSOs need from support services, particularly in rural contexts. This study aimed to identify (1) the enablers and barriers to accessing support services reported by CSOs in rural Australia and (2) to explore what CSOs in rural Australia want and need from services to support their own wellbeing.

Design: A descriptive qualitative study involving semi‐structured interviews. Data was analysed using thematic analysis with a pragmatic focus.

Setting: Interviews were conducted via zoom, across rural Australia.

Participants: Twenty‐six CSOs are living across rural Australia.

Results: Two domains, each containing three themes, were identified. Domain 1 Factors influencing access to formal support included the themes: (1) personal barriers, (2) structural and systemic factors and (3) modes of delivery. Domain 2 Preferences and needs in support services included the themes: (1) the need for professional support, (2) recognition of CSOs' own needs and (3) qualities of effective professional support.

Conclusion: CSOs' access to support is shaped by multiple structural and interpersonal factors. CSOs value professional and non‐judgemental support delivered by clinicians knowledgeable about substance use. Findings highlight the need to strengthen rural service capacity and extend research involving CSOs who are not currently accessing support or those experiencing additional risks such as domestic violence.

Trial Registration: Charles Sturt University Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number H23769), registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR, ACTRN12623000796684)

Related

  1. Risk of psychiatric disorders among concerned significant others of people with substance use
    EM Sundin
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMCEurope PMC
  2. Psychological therapy for auditory verbal hallucinations: A qualitative assessment of voice-hearers’ experiences and preferences
    Sanne Brederoo, Gerda van Ittersum, Francisca Goedhart +3
    PsyArXivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  3. The lived experiences of primary caregivers supporting adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury: a qualitative systematic review and meta-aggregation
    Xubin He, Xinghong Xu, Ping Yang +2
    Frontiers in psychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCCrossref
  4. A qualitative narrative analysis of family carers supporting young adults in the early stages of psychosis.
    Kristen E Zentner, Roxoliana Tsisar, Katherine Shettell +2
    Discover mental healthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCDOAJ
  5. Informal carers’ experiences of mental health services regarding supporting those they care for and getting support for their own wellbeing: A systematic umbrella review of qualitative evidence
    Xiaoye Liu, Phoebe Barnett, Patrick Nyikavaranda +2
    PLOS Mental HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePsychiatry & mental healthPLOS
BibTeX
@article{gray2026supporting,
  title = {{Supporting Concerned Significant Others of People Who Use Substances in Rural Australia: A Qualitative Study of Barriers, Enablers and Service Preferences}},
  author = {Heidi Gray and Nicole Snowdon and Nicola Ivory and Matt Thomas and Julaine Allan},
  journal = {The Australian Journal of Rural Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1111/ajr.70250},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.70250},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Supporting Concerned Significant Others of People Who Use Substances in Rural Australia: A Qualitative Study of Barriers, Enablers and Service Preferences
AU  - Heidi Gray
AU  - Nicole Snowdon
AU  - Nicola Ivory
AU  - Matt Thomas
AU  - Julaine Allan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/04
JO  - The Australian Journal of Rural Health
DO  - 10.1111/ajr.70250
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.70250
AB  - Objective: Problematic substance use can significantly affect the wellbeing of family members and friends (hereafter concerned significant others—CSOs). Despite the substantial burden they experience, CSOs face multiple barriers when seeking support for themselves. Further, limited research has explored what CSOs need from support services, particularly in rural contexts. This study aimed to identify (1) the enablers and barriers to accessing support services reported by CSOs in rural Australia and (2) to explore what CSOs in rural Australia want and need from services to support their own wellbeing.  Design: A descriptive qualitative study involving semi‐structured interviews. Data was analysed using thematic analysis with a pragmatic focus.  Setting: Interviews were conducted via zoom, across rural Australia.  Participants: Twenty‐six CSOs are living across rural Australia.  Results: Two domains, each containing three themes, were identified. Domain 1 Factors influencing access to formal support included the themes: (1) personal barriers, (2) structural and systemic factors and (3) modes of delivery. Domain 2 Preferences and needs in support services included the themes: (1) the need for professional support, (2) recognition of CSOs' own needs and (3) qualities of effective professional support.  Conclusion: CSOs' access to support is shaped by multiple structural and interpersonal factors. CSOs value professional and non‐judgemental support delivered by clinicians knowledgeable about substance use. Findings highlight the need to strengthen rural service capacity and extend research involving CSOs who are not currently accessing support or those experiencing additional risks such as domestic violence.  Trial Registration: Charles Sturt University Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number H23769), registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR, ACTRN12623000796684)
SN  - 1038-5282
SN  - 1440-1584
ER  -