Does roadless rule? Social-ecological consequences of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule

Abstract

The Roadless Rule, established 25 years ago to maintain 58.5 million federal forest acres in roadless condition, is one of the U.S.’s most expansive and debated natural resource experiments. We synthesize research on the effects of the Roadless Rule on biodiversity, wildfire, forest and watershed health, and economics to guide current and future decision making. Research shows the Roadless Rule provides substantial biodiversity protections. Wildfire outcomes of the Roadless Rule are mixed. Compared to roaded federal forests, Roadless Areas have fewer human-caused ignitions, similar wildfire severity, and tend towards larger wildfires. Although management occurs in Roadless Areas, it remains unclear if wildfire interventions and outcomes sufficiently match management goals. The Roadless Rule protects large watershed areas and river lengths and provides drinking water to millions of Americans. Even so, the Rule effects on water quality or supply are largely unmeasured. The Roadless Rule often benefits rural economies – largely through recreation and amenity values – with possible tradeoffs. Retaining the Rule would maintain conservation and existing economic benefits. Rescinding the Rule would impair these benefits. Increasing protections for Roadless Areas could constrain necessary management without clear benefits. Adjustments to the Roadless Rule may increase management flexibility and would benefit from effectiveness research.

Inbreeding Depression in Wild Mammals: Genomic Mechanisms and Conservation Consequences.
Ayesha Anwar, Tabris Yik To Chung, Chendi Zhu +2
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI16 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGenetics & genomicsEurope PMC
Advancing Marine Mammal Conservation Through Omics Tools and Integration of Indigenous Ecological Knowledge
Isabella M. Reeves, Gabrielle Genty, Alana Alexander +30
Molecular ecology1 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGenetics & genomicsEurope PMC
Not All Shrubs are Equal: The Outsized Ecological Consequences of Ericaceous Shrub Encroachment on Communities and Ecosystem Processes
Aadia Moseley-McCloud, Aimee Classen
EcoEvoRxiv27 Oct 2026PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEcologyEcoEvoRxiv
Small hydropower plants, large consequences: why low environmental impact in legislation does not mean low impact on migratory fish
Alexandre Peressin, Stephannie Fernandes, Ivo Gavião Prado +2
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation25 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEcologyDOAJ
Abiotic and biotic ecological factors affect the genomic consequences of plant-butterfly coevolution
T. Figueira, Q. Rusman, F. P. Schiestl
bioRxiv23 Sep 2026PreprintCC BYFull textEvolutionary biologybioRxiv

Cite

BibTeX RIS

BibTeX

@misc{lambert2026does,
  title = {{Does roadless rule? Social-ecological consequences of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule}},
  author = {Max Lambert and J. Nicholas Hendershot and Michael Case and James Robertson and Ailene K Ettinger and Michele S Buonanduci and Ryan D Haugo and Kerry L Metlen and Marcos D Robles and Joseph Fargione},
  howpublished = {EcoEvoRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.32942/x2d68f},
  url = {https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/14916/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}

RIS

TY  - UNPB
TI  - Does roadless rule? Social-ecological consequences of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule
AU  - Max Lambert
AU  - J. Nicholas Hendershot
AU  - Michael Case
AU  - James Robertson
AU  - Ailene K Ettinger
AU  - Michele S Buonanduci
AU  - Ryan D Haugo
AU  - Kerry L Metlen
AU  - Marcos D Robles
AU  - Joseph Fargione
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/11
PB  - EcoEvoRxiv
DO  - 10.32942/x2d68f
UR  - https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/14916/
AB  - The Roadless Rule, established 25 years ago to maintain 58.5 million federal forest acres in roadless condition, is one of the U.S.’s most expansive and debated natural resource experiments. We synthesize research on the effects of the Roadless Rule on biodiversity, wildfire, forest and watershed health, and economics to guide current and future decision making. Research shows the Roadless Rule provides substantial biodiversity protections. Wildfire outcomes of the Roadless Rule are mixed. Compared to roaded federal forests, Roadless Areas have fewer human-caused ignitions, similar wildfire severity, and tend towards larger wildfires. Although management occurs in Roadless Areas, it remains unclear if wildfire interventions and outcomes sufficiently match management goals. The Roadless Rule protects large watershed areas and river lengths and provides drinking water to millions of Americans. Even so, the Rule effects on water quality or supply are largely unmeasured. The Roadless Rule often benefits rural economies – largely through recreation and amenity values – with possible tradeoffs. Retaining the Rule would maintain conservation and existing economic benefits. Rescinding the Rule would impair these benefits. Increasing protections for Roadless Areas could constrain necessary management without clear benefits. Adjustments to the Roadless Rule may increase management flexibility and would benefit from effectiveness research.
ER  -

Abstract

Related

Cite