Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 40 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

Associations of lesion-specific pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation and CT-derived fractional flow reserve with coronary stenosis progression: a retrospective selected-lesion study

  1. 1Department of CT Radiology, The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
  2. 2College of Medical Imaging, Shanxi Medical University

Abstract

Background: Coronary disease that is non-obstructive at baseline may progress, while luminal stenosis alone does not capture local pericoronary tissue characteristics or lesion-specific functional impairment.

Objective: To assess associations of lesion-specific pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) attenuation and CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) with imaging-defined stenosis progression and to evaluate an exploratory multivariable model.

Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 201 patients undergoing serial coronary computed tomography angiography with selected target lesions classified as minimal or mild at baseline. In progressors, the lesion with the greatest follow-up progression was selected; in non-progressors, the lesion with the greatest baseline stenosis was selected. Thus, target-lesion selection was outcome dependent. Lesion-specific PCAT and CT-FFR were quantified using dedicated automated software after target-lesion identification. Five logistic models specified before reanalysis fitting were fitted in a common complete-case population ( n = 191), and Model E retained nine predictors. Internal performance was assessed with 2,000 patient-level bootstrap resamples.

Results: Progression occurred in 115 of 201 patients. In Model E, less-negative PCAT attenuation (odds ratio [OR] per 10-HU increase, 1.552; 95% CI, 1.137–2.119; P = 0.006) and lower CT-FFR (OR per 0.05 decrease, 1.360; 95% CI, 1.041–1.778; P = 0.024) were associated with progression; age showed an inverse conditional association (OR per 10-year increase, 0.509; 95% CI, 0.346–0.749; P < 0.001). Model E had an apparent AUC of 0.767 (95% CI, 0.700–0.834) and an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.722 (95% bootstrap interval, 0.659–0.787). The corrected Brier score was 0.217 (0.189–0.251), calibration intercept −0.0002 (−0.354 to 0.361), and calibration slope 0.779 (0.539–1.100). Versus Model B, corrected Δ AUC was 0.053 (−0.005 to 0.088), indicating apparent improvement with uncertainty.

Conclusions: Less-negative lesion-specific PCAT attenuation and lower CT-FFR were associated with imaging-defined stenosis progression. The combined model showed moderate optimism-corrected discrimination, but incremental discrimination remained uncertain. Because lesion selection in progressors incorporated follow-up information and no external validation was available, this internally derived model is exploratory and is not a clinically validated decision tool.

Related

  1. Elevated pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation assessed by fat attenuation index in atrial fibrillation without cardiovascular comorbidities: a retrospective observational study
    Weiheng He, Junjie Huang, Yishen Lian +16
    Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cardiovascular medicineCrossref
  2. Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Pericoronary Fat Attenuation Index and AI-Based Cardiovascular Risk Score as a Proposed New Pathway in a Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinic: A Single-Centre Retrospective Registry Study
    Nerea Sanfeliu Garces, Ahmed Alsinbili, Lucas Costa +5
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
  3. Deep learning–based quantification of muscle volume and attenuation and their associations with preinjury ambulatory status in patients with hip fractures
    Tomoki Asano, Keisuke Uemura, Sotaro Kono +10
    Osteoporosis and sarcopeniaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Perivascular fat attenuation index improves the identification of functional myocardial ischemia beyond traditional risk factors: a coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve study
    Zhihong Gao, Lingmei Jia, Min Jia
    Frontiers in cardiovascular medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMCCrossref
  5. Associations of multiregional OCTA metrics and systemic hematologic biomarkers With 12-month diabetic retinopathy progression
    Lina Ge, Shenghai Huang, Weihe Zhou +4
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{wang2026associations,
  title = {{Associations of lesion-specific pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation and CT-derived fractional flow reserve with coronary stenosis progression: a retrospective selected-lesion study}},
  author = {Jun Wang and Kenan Song and Sheng He and Suping Chen and Yanjun Hou and Wenqing Chen and Jian Liu and Li Feng and Wenfeng Wei and Zengyu Jiang},
  journal = {Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3389/fcvm.2026.1954142},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1954142/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Associations of lesion-specific pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation and CT-derived fractional flow reserve with coronary stenosis progression: a retrospective selected-lesion study
AU  - Jun Wang
AU  - Kenan Song
AU  - Sheng He
AU  - Suping Chen
AU  - Yanjun Hou
AU  - Wenqing Chen
AU  - Jian Liu
AU  - Li Feng
AU  - Wenfeng Wei
AU  - Zengyu Jiang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/09
JO  - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
DO  - 10.3389/fcvm.2026.1954142
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1954142/full
AB  - Background: Coronary disease that is non-obstructive at baseline may progress, while luminal stenosis alone does not capture local pericoronary tissue characteristics or lesion-specific functional impairment.  Objective: To assess associations of lesion-specific pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) attenuation and CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) with imaging-defined stenosis progression and to evaluate an exploratory multivariable model.  Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 201 patients undergoing serial coronary computed tomography angiography with selected target lesions classified as minimal or mild at baseline. In progressors, the lesion with the greatest follow-up progression was selected; in non-progressors, the lesion with the greatest baseline stenosis was selected. Thus, target-lesion selection was outcome dependent. Lesion-specific PCAT and CT-FFR were quantified using dedicated automated software after target-lesion identification. Five logistic models specified before reanalysis fitting were fitted in a common complete-case population ( n = 191), and Model E retained nine predictors. Internal performance was assessed with 2,000 patient-level bootstrap resamples.  Results: Progression occurred in 115 of 201 patients. In Model E, less-negative PCAT attenuation (odds ratio [OR] per 10-HU increase, 1.552; 95% CI, 1.137–2.119; P = 0.006) and lower CT-FFR (OR per 0.05 decrease, 1.360; 95% CI, 1.041–1.778; P = 0.024) were associated with progression; age showed an inverse conditional association (OR per 10-year increase, 0.509; 95% CI, 0.346–0.749; P < 0.001). Model E had an apparent AUC of 0.767 (95% CI, 0.700–0.834) and an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.722 (95% bootstrap interval, 0.659–0.787). The corrected Brier score was 0.217 (0.189–0.251), calibration intercept −0.0002 (−0.354 to 0.361), and calibration slope 0.779 (0.539–1.100). Versus Model B, corrected Δ AUC was 0.053 (−0.005 to 0.088), indicating apparent improvement with uncertainty.  Conclusions: Less-negative lesion-specific PCAT attenuation and lower CT-FFR were associated with imaging-defined stenosis progression. The combined model showed moderate optimism-corrected discrimination, but incremental discrimination remained uncertain. Because lesion selection in progressors incorporated follow-up information and no external validation was available, this internally derived model is exploratory and is not a clinically validated decision tool.
SN  - 2297-055X
ER  -