Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Whose morning, whose evening? Temporal asymmetries in intermedia agenda-setting between X and online news in Türkiye

  1. 1Department of New Media and Communication, Faculty of Communication, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Türkiye
  2. 2Department of Computer Technology and Information Systems, Faculty of Science, Bartın University, Bartın, Türkiye

Abstract

This study examines whether temporal ordering between X and online news varies across first-level issue and second-level attribute agendas in Türkiye’s polarized media environment. The analysis draws on 448,664 X posts and 10,357 articles from 19 mainstream online news outlets collected during the 31-day period preceding and including the 31 March 2024 Istanbul local election. Using 12-hour AM/PM windows, we conducted 122 cross-lagged panel analyses—62 same-day AM → PM and 60 overnight PM→next-day AM panels across the two agenda levels—comparing issue- and attribute-indicator frequency profiles. First-level issue agendas were strongly synchronized, with correlations often approaching or exceeding r = .90, whereas second-level attribute relationships were weaker and less consistent. At the first level, morning online news issue salience more often preceded later X issue salience within same-day transitions, whereas evening X issue salience more often preceded the following morning’s online news issue salience across overnight transitions. Most first-level cross-lagged correlations exceeded their Rozelle–Campbell (RCb) baselines, while second-level coefficients did so less consistently. These findings indicate that agenda leadership in a hybrid media system is temporally contingent and level-specific rather than static. The observed patterns represent temporally ordered associations and should not be interpreted as evidence of direct causal influence.

Related

  1. From morning departures to evening returns: a probabilistic model for forecasting bike-sharing demand
    Mohamadou Salifou
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textStatisticsHAL
  2. Discovering Heron's Triangle Area Formula in a Morning in the Rain
    Eric L. Grinberg
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  3. Are there asymmetries in euro area monetary policy transmission?
    Michael Pfarrhofer, Anna Stelzer
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Addendum: On generalized canonical bundle formula and boundedness of complements in complex analytic setting
    Kenta Hashizume
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  5. Cheng's Theorem in the Spectral Setting
    Carolina Ruviaro
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyarXiv
BibTeX
@article{ceylan2026whose,
  title = {{Whose morning, whose evening? Temporal asymmetries in intermedia agenda-setting between X and online news in Türkiye}},
  author = {Mehmet Ceylan and Ramazan Yılmaz and Rumeysa Erdoğan Bodur},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0362255},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0362255},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Whose morning, whose evening? Temporal asymmetries in intermedia agenda-setting between X and online news in Türkiye
AU  - Mehmet Ceylan
AU  - Ramazan Yılmaz
AU  - Rumeysa Erdoğan Bodur
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/06
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0362255
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0362255
AB  - This study examines whether temporal ordering between X and online news varies across first-level issue and second-level attribute agendas in Türkiye’s polarized media environment. The analysis draws on 448,664 X posts and 10,357 articles from 19 mainstream online news outlets collected during the 31-day period preceding and including the 31 March 2024 Istanbul local election. Using 12-hour AM/PM windows, we conducted 122 cross-lagged panel analyses—62 same-day AM → PM and 60 overnight PM→next-day AM panels across the two agenda levels—comparing issue- and attribute-indicator frequency profiles. First-level issue agendas were strongly synchronized, with correlations often approaching or exceeding r = .90, whereas second-level attribute relationships were weaker and less consistent. At the first level, morning online news issue salience more often preceded later X issue salience within same-day transitions, whereas evening X issue salience more often preceded the following morning’s online news issue salience across overnight transitions. Most first-level cross-lagged correlations exceeded their Rozelle–Campbell (RCb) baselines, while second-level coefficients did so less consistently. These findings indicate that agenda leadership in a hybrid media system is temporally contingent and level-specific rather than static. The observed patterns represent temporally ordered associations and should not be interpreted as evidence of direct causal influence.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -