Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
189,280 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Sharp Causal Bounds for Dynamic Treatment Regimes

Abstract

We study dynamic treatment regimes under contemporaneous confounding: at each stage, an unmeasured factor may affect both treatment and the next observed state, but has no further direct effect on later stages. From the observational distribution, the causal graph, and specified structural restrictions on possible next states, we construct at each state--treatment pair the set of transition probabilities compatible with this information. These local sets require no sensitivity parameter and can be combined by backward induction to obtain lower and upper bounds on the expected outcome under any given treatment regime. Our main result shows that these bounds are sharp: their endpoints are exactly the smallest and largest expected outcomes generated by causal models compatible with the same observational distribution, causal graph, and structural restrictions. The same backward-induction method gives a maximin rule for choosing treatments by maximizing the worst-case expected outcome. Thus, for this class of models with contemporaneous confounding, the framework generalizes the classical g-formula of \citet{Robins1986} for evaluating treatment regimes and the Q-learning framework of \citet{Murphy2003} for selecting them. When the local transition probabilities are identified, the two recursions reduce to these classical methods.

Related

  1. The Missing Corner: When Sharp Causal Bounds Fail to Compose
    Yicheng Qi, Xiyi Xiong
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes for Personalized Education: A Tutorial and Applications with Machine Learning
    Chenguang Pan, Yuxuan Li, Thomas Harris +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Nonparametric Efficient Estimation of Dynamic Treatment Regimes with Competing Risks
    Nitya Shah, Laura D. Carbone, Howard A. Fink +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Deformed Q-learning for High-Dimensional Dynamic Treatment Regimes
    Ming Cheng, Zhao Chen, Christina Dan Wang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Sharp Bounds on Continuous Treatment Effects under Unobserved Confounding
    Junzhe Zhang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{alvarez2026sharp,
  title = {{Sharp Causal Bounds for Dynamic Treatment Regimes}},
  author = {Alexander Alvarez and Sebastian E. Ferrando},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.06397},
  eprint = {2609.06397},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06397},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Sharp Causal Bounds for Dynamic Treatment Regimes
AU  - Alexander Alvarez
AU  - Sebastian E. Ferrando
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/06
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.06397
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06397
AB  - We study dynamic treatment regimes under contemporaneous confounding: at each stage, an unmeasured factor may affect both treatment and the next observed state, but has no further direct effect on later stages. From the observational distribution, the causal graph, and specified structural restrictions on possible next states, we construct at each state--treatment pair the set of transition probabilities compatible with this information. These local sets require no sensitivity parameter and can be combined by backward induction to obtain lower and upper bounds on the expected outcome under any given treatment regime. Our main result shows that these bounds are sharp: their endpoints are exactly the smallest and largest expected outcomes generated by causal models compatible with the same observational distribution, causal graph, and structural restrictions. The same backward-induction method gives a maximin rule for choosing treatments by maximizing the worst-case expected outcome. Thus, for this class of models with contemporaneous confounding, the framework generalizes the classical g-formula of \citet{Robins1986} for evaluating treatment regimes and the Q-learning framework of \citet{Murphy2003} for selecting them. When the local transition probabilities are identified, the two recursions reduce to these classical methods.
ER  -