PreprintAll rights reservedPsyArXiv
Citation Fabrication and Accuracy in AI-Generated Psychiatric Research: A Comparative Evaluation of Four Contemporary Large Language Models
Related
- Artificial intelligence versus physician decision-making in acute heart failure: a comparative evaluation of four contemporary AI systems
- Guideline adherence and expert-rated potential safety concerns in AI-generated dietary advice for patients with cirrhosis: a comparative evaluation of large language models.
- Comparative Evaluation of ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and Physician-Generated Acupuncture Treatment Protocols Across Chinese and English Language Settings: Cross-Sectional Evaluation Study.
- AI-generated high-intensity interval training information: a cross-sectional comparative evaluation of quality and readability
- Comparative midterm outcomes of contemporary revascularization strategies for acute lower limb ischemia: a retrospective cohort study
BibTeX
@misc{linardon2026citation,
title = {{Citation Fabrication and Accuracy in AI-Generated Psychiatric Research: A Comparative Evaluation of Four Contemporary Large Language Models}},
author = {Jake Linardon and Cleo Anderson and Tayarna Bolger and Claudia Liu and Olivia Marie Soliman and Zoe McClure},
howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/qs26b_v1},
url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/qs26b_v1/},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Citation Fabrication and Accuracy in AI-Generated Psychiatric Research: A Comparative Evaluation of Four Contemporary Large Language Models
AU - Jake Linardon
AU - Cleo Anderson
AU - Tayarna Bolger
AU - Claudia Liu
AU - Olivia Marie Soliman
AU - Zoe McClure
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/09
PB - PsyArXiv
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/qs26b_v1
UR - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/qs26b_v1/
ER -