Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,869 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Spherical law for optimal layouts of random graphs

Abstract

Can the nodes of a random graph be placed in an auxiliary space ℝM so that its connectivity becomes local? The spring electric layout is a standard algorithm to try to find such local graph layouts; we study it as a statistical-physics problem by considering the Gibbs ensemble of spring-electric layouts. For graphs with independent edges we solve the model exactly at large number of nodes N and fixed embedding dimension M. The node positions obey a spherical law: they are uniformly distributed in an M-dimensional ball; for M=2 this is closely related to Girko's circular law. Crucially, the ground state energy is flat across all layouts with that density: an optimal layout for one graph is asymptotically optimal for any other. Optimal layouts of i.i.d. graphs are therefore frustrated liquids, macroscopically constrained but microscopically unoptimizable. We discuss relations to graph-partitioning, Laplacian eigenmaps, and dimensionality reduction, and outline how this harsh result breaks down for correlated graphs.

Related

  1. R-transforms for non-Hermitian block random matrices: a spherical integral approach
    Pierre Bousseyroux
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsProbabilityarXiv
  2. Scalable quantum-enhanced greedy algorithm for the maximum independent set problems on random regular graphs
    Elisabeth Wybo, Jami Rönkkö, Olli Hirviniemi +2
    Physical Review ResearchPeer-reviewedPublisher termsAtomic, molecular & optical physicsCrossref
  3. Random Cellular Automata and deBruijn Graphs
    Janko Gravner, Travis Kulhanek
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  4. Random layers for quantum optimal control with exponential expressivity
    Marco Dall’Ara, Martin Koppenhöfer, Florentin Reiter +3
    PRX QuantumPeer-reviewedPublisher termsQuantum physics & quantum informationCrossref
  5. Fuzzy Erdos-Renyi random graphs: Spectral statistics
    J. A. Mendez-Bermudez
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{stubenrauch2026spherical,
  title = {{Spherical law for optimal layouts of random graphs}},
  author = {Jakob Stubenrauch and Christian Keup},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.40965},
  eprint = {2610.40965},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40965},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Spherical law for optimal layouts of random graphs
AU  - Jakob Stubenrauch
AU  - Christian Keup
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.40965
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40965
AB  - Can the nodes of a random graph be placed in an auxiliary space ℝ^M so that its connectivity becomes local? The spring electric layout is a standard algorithm to try to find such local graph layouts; we study it as a statistical-physics problem by considering the Gibbs ensemble of spring-electric layouts. For graphs with independent edges we solve the model exactly at large number of nodes N and fixed embedding dimension M. The node positions obey a spherical law: they are uniformly distributed in an M-dimensional ball; for M=2 this is closely related to Girko's circular law. Crucially, the ground state energy is flat across all layouts with that density: an optimal layout for one graph is asymptotically optimal for any other. Optimal layouts of i.i.d. graphs are therefore frustrated liquids, macroscopically constrained but microscopically unoptimizable. We discuss relations to graph-partitioning, Laplacian eigenmaps, and dimensionality reduction, and outline how this harsh result breaks down for correlated graphs.
ER  -