Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Long-Term Prospective Validation of the AO Spine PROST (Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma)
Abstract
Study design Prospective observational multicenter cohort study. Objectives To determine Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of AO Spine PROST (Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma) and conducting a long-term prospective validation. Methods Data were collected from a prospective observational international multicenter cohort study. Adults (18-65) with acute thoracolumbar (TL) burst fractures without neurologic deficits were enrolled, and followed for up to 2 years. Patients completed the AO Spine PROST, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EQ-5D, and Pain NRS. Characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics, MCID for PROST with distribution-based approach using the standard deviation (SD) of change in scores. Floor and ceiling effects were also evaluated. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha, item-total correlation coefficient (ITCC) and pairwise Spearman correlation), construct validity (Pearson correlations (r s ) with ODI, EQ-5D, Pain NRS), and responsiveness (effect sizes (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM)) were assessed. Results Ninety-three patients were included. MCID for a moderate change (0.5*SD) in PROST score was 10.6. No floor or ceiling effects were observed. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach’s α = 0.9-1.0 and acceptable ITCC). PROST scores strongly correlated with ODI (rs = −0.67 to −0.89; P < .001), but correlations with EQ-5D were weak (r s = −0.29 to 0.05; P > .005), except at 1-year follow-up. No consistent pattern was found with Pain NRS. Responsiveness was very good (ES = 3.2, SRM = 3.1; P < .001). Conclusions The AO Spine PROST identified an MCID of 10.6 as indicative of a moderate clinically meaningful change. The instrument also showed strong internal consistency, construct validity, and excellent responsiveness in long-term follow-up.
Related
- Identification of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for Childhood Autism Rating Scale Second Edition (CARS2) in children with ASD
- Minimal Clinically Important Changes of Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Acute Postsurgical Pain
- Tranexamic acid use and progression to clinically important bleeding in critically ill patients with non-clinically important non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective cohort study
- Tiotropium and clinically important deterioration in mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a post hoc win ratio analysis of the Tie-COPD study.
- Double‐Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Provides Superior Short‐to‐Midterm Rotational Stability But Not Clinically Important Functional Gains Over Single‐Bundle: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
BibTeX
@article{saidsadiqimd2026minimal,
title = {{Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Long-Term Prospective Validation of the AO Spine PROST (Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma)}},
author = {Said Sadiqi MD, PhD and Charlotte Dandurand MD, MSc, FRCSC and Richard J. Bransford MD and Lorin M. Benneker MD and Andrei F. Joaquim MD, PhD and Ulrich Spiegl MD and Jin W. Tee BMedSci, MBBS, MD, FRACS and Alexander R. Vaccaro MD, PhD, MBA and F. Cumhur Oner MD, PhD},
journal = {Global Spine Journal},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1177/21925682261445019},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261445019},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Long-Term Prospective Validation of the AO Spine PROST (Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma)
AU - Said Sadiqi MD, PhD
AU - Charlotte Dandurand MD, MSc, FRCSC
AU - Richard J. Bransford MD
AU - Lorin M. Benneker MD
AU - Andrei F. Joaquim MD, PhD
AU - Ulrich Spiegl MD
AU - Jin W. Tee BMedSci, MBBS, MD, FRACS
AU - Alexander R. Vaccaro MD, PhD, MBA
AU - F. Cumhur Oner MD, PhD
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/31
JO - Global Spine Journal
DO - 10.1177/21925682261445019
UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261445019
AB - Study design Prospective observational multicenter cohort study. Objectives To determine Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of AO Spine PROST (Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma) and conducting a long-term prospective validation. Methods Data were collected from a prospective observational international multicenter cohort study. Adults (18-65) with acute thoracolumbar (TL) burst fractures without neurologic deficits were enrolled, and followed for up to 2 years. Patients completed the AO Spine PROST, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EQ-5D, and Pain NRS. Characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics, MCID for PROST with distribution-based approach using the standard deviation (SD) of change in scores. Floor and ceiling effects were also evaluated. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha, item-total correlation coefficient (ITCC) and pairwise Spearman correlation), construct validity (Pearson correlations (r s ) with ODI, EQ-5D, Pain NRS), and responsiveness (effect sizes (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM)) were assessed. Results Ninety-three patients were included. MCID for a moderate change (0.5*SD) in PROST score was 10.6. No floor or ceiling effects were observed. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach’s α = 0.9-1.0 and acceptable ITCC). PROST scores strongly correlated with ODI (rs = −0.67 to −0.89; P < .001), but correlations with EQ-5D were weak (r s = −0.29 to 0.05; P > .005), except at 1-year follow-up. No consistent pattern was found with Pain NRS. Responsiveness was very good (ES = 3.2, SRM = 3.1; P < .001). Conclusions The AO Spine PROST identified an MCID of 10.6 as indicative of a moderate clinically meaningful change. The instrument also showed strong internal consistency, construct validity, and excellent responsiveness in long-term follow-up.
SN - 2192-5682
SN - 2192-5690
ER -