Epidemic and pandemic preparedness in the MENA region: A descriptive analysis of stakeholder distribution, patterns, and regional variation
- 1Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
- 2Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut (AUB), Beirut, Lebanon
Abstract
Epidemic and pandemic preparedness relies on multi-sectoral coordination, a competent workforce, and well-defined preparedness functions. In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, preparedness is shaped by diverse health system capacities, political contexts and recurrent crises. Despite recurrent outbreaks in the region, limited regional-level evidence exists on who is involved in preparedness and how different roles are distributed across preparedness domains, as well as countries and income settings. This cross-sectional stakeholder mapping study identified stakeholder roles, affiliations, and organizations involved in epidemic and pandemic preparedness across 22 MENA countries. Using publicly available online sources, stakeholder roles were systematically identified and categorized according to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) public health emergency preparedness framework. Records were analyzed by preparedness domain, workforce category, organizational affiliation, country, income level, and gender. A total of 3555 stakeholder roles were identified across the region. Roles were predominantly classified under coordination and communication (38.4%) and health services (32.0%), while emergency risk communication (4.1%) and policy development, adaptation, and implementation (6.6%) were the least represented domains. Emergency management roles constituted the largest workforce group (42.6%), followed by public health professionals (28.3%) and clinicians (19.4%). Significant variation was observed across country income levels, including differences in preparedness domains, workforce categories, organizational affiliation, and gender distribution. Records associated with women accounted for 31.5% of the total roles, with their representation varying across income groups. Preparedness-related roles were identified across the MENA region but vary in their distribution across domains, workforce categories, and countries. The greater representation of records in operational roles, alongside limited representation in policy development and emergency risk communication, highlights differences in the publicly identifiable preparedness landscape across functions. These findings provide a regional descriptive overview that can inform future validation, stakeholder engagement, and capacity-building efforts across the MENA region.
Related
- Stakeholder contribution to one health preparedness and operationalization for rift valley fever outbreaks in Baringo County, Kenya: the one health scorecard approach
- Stakeholder perspectives on the effects of global health initiatives on the quality of maternal health services in government health facilities in the Elgon Region, Uganda: a qualitative descriptive study
- Anopheles Mosquito Distribution and Malaria Outbreak Risk Assessment in Georgia, USA (2001 2025): Implications for Surveillance and Preparedness.
- The distribution of asymptomatic disease duration in transmission models for tuberculosis: implications for epidemic projections and the impact of active case finding
- Indicators, spatial distribution, and hidden endemicity of Hansen's disease: descriptive study, Piauí, 2018-2022.
BibTeX
@article{alaeddine2026epidemic,
title = {{Epidemic and pandemic preparedness in the MENA region: A descriptive analysis of stakeholder distribution, patterns, and regional variation}},
author = {Rim Alaeddine and Zahraa Chamseddine and Nour Zaouk and Zeinab Awad and Zahi Abdul Sater and Shadi Saleh},
journal = {PLOS Global Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pgph.0007574},
url = {https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007574},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Epidemic and pandemic preparedness in the MENA region: A descriptive analysis of stakeholder distribution, patterns, and regional variation
AU - Rim Alaeddine
AU - Zahraa Chamseddine
AU - Nour Zaouk
AU - Zeinab Awad
AU - Zahi Abdul Sater
AU - Shadi Saleh
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/06
JO - PLOS Global Public Health
DO - 10.1371/journal.pgph.0007574
UR - https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007574
AB - Epidemic and pandemic preparedness relies on multi-sectoral coordination, a competent workforce, and well-defined preparedness functions. In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, preparedness is shaped by diverse health system capacities, political contexts and recurrent crises. Despite recurrent outbreaks in the region, limited regional-level evidence exists on who is involved in preparedness and how different roles are distributed across preparedness domains, as well as countries and income settings. This cross-sectional stakeholder mapping study identified stakeholder roles, affiliations, and organizations involved in epidemic and pandemic preparedness across 22 MENA countries. Using publicly available online sources, stakeholder roles were systematically identified and categorized according to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) public health emergency preparedness framework. Records were analyzed by preparedness domain, workforce category, organizational affiliation, country, income level, and gender. A total of 3555 stakeholder roles were identified across the region. Roles were predominantly classified under coordination and communication (38.4%) and health services (32.0%), while emergency risk communication (4.1%) and policy development, adaptation, and implementation (6.6%) were the least represented domains. Emergency management roles constituted the largest workforce group (42.6%), followed by public health professionals (28.3%) and clinicians (19.4%). Significant variation was observed across country income levels, including differences in preparedness domains, workforce categories, organizational affiliation, and gender distribution. Records associated with women accounted for 31.5% of the total roles, with their representation varying across income groups. Preparedness-related roles were identified across the MENA region but vary in their distribution across domains, workforce categories, and countries. The greater representation of records in operational roles, alongside limited representation in policy development and emergency risk communication, highlights differences in the publicly identifiable preparedness landscape across functions. These findings provide a regional descriptive overview that can inform future validation, stakeholder engagement, and capacity-building efforts across the MENA region.
SN - 2767-3375
ER -