Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPLOS One

Impact of broadly targeted enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in hysterectomy versus other gynecologic surgeries

5 affiliations
  1. 1Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
  2. 2Rothman Opioid Foundation, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
  3. 3Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, New Jersey, United States of America.
  4. 4Dell Medical School at The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
  5. 5Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Abstract

Introduction: The opioid epidemic in the United States poses a major public health challenge, with postoperative prescribing recognized as a significant source of initial opioid exposure. Midwestern states, including Iowa, have experienced substantial opioid-related morbidity and mortality, reflecting broader national trends of opioid misuse, diversion, and overdose. Excess postoperative opioid prescribing increases the availability of unused medications, which are often retained in households and pose ongoing risks for diversion and nonmedical use. These challenges highlight the need for effective, scalable strategies to reduce opioid exposure at surgical discharge. Accordingly, this study investigated the impact of a broadly targeted Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway on opioid prescribing at discharge for hysterectomy patients compared to other gynecologic procedures. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted across six Iowa hospitals implementing the “Billion Pill Pledge” ERAS pathway. Two groups of patients underwent surgery between November 3, 2022 and April 4, 2024: those undergoing hysterectomy (n = 63) and those undergoing other gynecologic surgeries (n = 30), including cervical hysteroscopy, cesarean section, endometriosis excision or ablation, and sterilization procedures. Pre-ERAS and post-ERAS implementation data from the postoperative period were analyzed between the two groups in terms of average opioid pill counts prescribed, percent reduction in pill counts prescribed after ERAS implementation, and percent of prescribed pills remaining unused. Results: Pre-ERAS data showed no significant difference in mean opioid pill counts prescribed at discharge between hysterectomies and other gynecologic surgeries (p = 0.3). Post-ERAS data displayed significantly higher mean pill counts for hysterectomies (23 pills) versus other gynecologic surgeries (16 pills) (p < 0.001). Patient-reported post-ERAS prescription quantities were significantly lower than surgeon-estimated pre-ERAS prescribing quantities for both hysterectomies (27 pills versus 23 pills) (p < 0.001) and other gynecologic surgeries (29 pills versus 16 pills) (p < 0.001). The hysterectomy group had a significantly smaller percent reduction in prescribed pill counts than the other gynecologic group (14% versus 40%) (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the proportion of prescribed pills left unused between the hysterectomy group (55%) and the other gynecologic group (65%) (p = 0.08). No prescription refills were reported within 30 days postoperatively. Conclusion: Patient-reported opioid prescription quantities prescribed at discharge following implementation of the Billion Pill Pledge ERAS pathway were significantly lower than surgeon-estimated pre-ERAS prescribing quantities across gynecologic surgeries, with a larger difference observed among non-hysterectomy procedures. Despite lower post-ERAS prescription quantities, over half of prescribed pills on average remained unused, highlighting the need for ongoing efforts to optimize postoperative opioid disposal practices. These findings suggest that broadly targeted ERAS pathways may be associated with lower postoperative opioid prescribing in gynecologic surgery.

Related

  1. Perioperative inflammation in gynecologic oncology: nursing strategies for enhanced recovery and complication prevention
    Xiaoyan Chen, Zhongshu Zhang, Shanli Xie +3
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society guidelines for gynecologic oncology: 2026 update
    Gregg S Nelson, Alon D. Altman, Amy Metcalfe +21
    Gynecologic OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text19 citedSurgery & anaesthesiaOpenAlex
  3. Enhanced recovery pathways for patients with chronic pain: beyond standard protocols – a narrative review
    Nourah Alotaibi, Patrice Forget, Hans de Boer
    Current Opinion in AnaesthesiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY1 citedSurgery & anaesthesiaHAL
  4. Simulating Transport Across the Blood-Brain Barrier Endothelial Membrane: Comparing Unbiased Molecular Dynamics Methods to Enhanced Sampling Protocols.
    Jerry Oluwasegun, Ben William Franey, Christian Jorgensen
    MembranesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMC
  5. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Sarcoma and Metastatic Bone Disease: A Scoping Review
    Leah Ferrie, Alex Gamage, Peter Lewkonia +6
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Surgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
BibTeX
@article{li2026impact,
  title = {{Impact of broadly targeted enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in hysterectomy versus other gynecologic surgeries}},
  author = {Tanya Li and Hadia Saroya and Jessica Lu and Wali U Pirzada and Simran F Shamith and Sina Ramtin and Asif M Ilyas},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0360744},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360744},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Impact of broadly targeted enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in hysterectomy versus other gynecologic surgeries
AU  - Tanya Li
AU  - Hadia Saroya
AU  - Jessica Lu
AU  - Wali U Pirzada
AU  - Simran F Shamith
AU  - Sina Ramtin
AU  - Asif M Ilyas
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0360744
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360744
AB  - Introduction: The opioid epidemic in the United States poses a major public health challenge, with postoperative prescribing recognized as a significant source of initial opioid exposure. Midwestern states, including Iowa, have experienced substantial opioid-related morbidity and mortality, reflecting broader national trends of opioid misuse, diversion, and overdose. Excess postoperative opioid prescribing increases the availability of unused medications, which are often retained in households and pose ongoing risks for diversion and nonmedical use. These challenges highlight the need for effective, scalable strategies to reduce opioid exposure at surgical discharge. Accordingly, this study investigated the impact of a broadly targeted Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway on opioid prescribing at discharge for hysterectomy patients compared to other gynecologic procedures. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted across six Iowa hospitals implementing the “Billion Pill Pledge” ERAS pathway. Two groups of patients underwent surgery between November 3, 2022 and April 4, 2024: those undergoing hysterectomy (n = 63) and those undergoing other gynecologic surgeries (n = 30), including cervical hysteroscopy, cesarean section, endometriosis excision or ablation, and sterilization procedures. Pre-ERAS and post-ERAS implementation data from the postoperative period were analyzed between the two groups in terms of average opioid pill counts prescribed, percent reduction in pill counts prescribed after ERAS implementation, and percent of prescribed pills remaining unused. Results: Pre-ERAS data showed no significant difference in mean opioid pill counts prescribed at discharge between hysterectomies and other gynecologic surgeries (p = 0.3). Post-ERAS data displayed significantly higher mean pill counts for hysterectomies (23 pills) versus other gynecologic surgeries (16 pills) (p < 0.001). Patient-reported post-ERAS prescription quantities were significantly lower than surgeon-estimated pre-ERAS prescribing quantities for both hysterectomies (27 pills versus 23 pills) (p < 0.001) and other gynecologic surgeries (29 pills versus 16 pills) (p < 0.001). The hysterectomy group had a significantly smaller percent reduction in prescribed pill counts than the other gynecologic group (14% versus 40%) (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the proportion of prescribed pills left unused between the hysterectomy group (55%) and the other gynecologic group (65%) (p = 0.08). No prescription refills were reported within 30 days postoperatively. Conclusion: Patient-reported opioid prescription quantities prescribed at discharge following implementation of the Billion Pill Pledge ERAS pathway were significantly lower than surgeon-estimated pre-ERAS prescribing quantities across gynecologic surgeries, with a larger difference observed among non-hysterectomy procedures. Despite lower post-ERAS prescription quantities, over half of prescribed pills on average remained unused, highlighting the need for ongoing efforts to optimize postoperative opioid disposal practices. These findings suggest that broadly targeted ERAS pathways may be associated with lower postoperative opioid prescribing in gynecologic surgery.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -