Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
PreprintCC BYChemRxiv

Dataset-specific retention time adjustment and multi-evidence lipid annotation: a reproducible R workflow for untargeted LC–MS lipidomics

6 affiliations
  1. 1Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, Urbanización Montepríncipe, Boadilla del Monte, Madrid, Spain, 28660
  2. 2Institute for Biomedicine
  3. 3Eurac Research
  4. 4Chair for Bioinformatics
  5. 5Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena
  6. 6Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, Urbanización Montepríncipe, Boadilla del Monte, Madrid, Spain, 28660

Abstract

Background and Objective: Untargeted lipid annotation by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry is challenged by structural isomers, multiple ion forms, and retention time differences between analytical datasets. We developed an open-source computational workflow combining dataset-specific retention time adjustment with experimentally characterized lipid information to restrict candidate assignments while preserving unresolved identities. Methods: The R workflow uses a curated database of 592 lipid species derived from a human plasma reference material. It combines monotonic retention time adjustment, accurate-mass matching, isotope-pattern assessment, empirical adduct profile, and ambiguity resolution. Developed using a 40-sample MICROSAMPLING study, it was applied to an independent 189-sample METFORMIN-HIIE study acquired under compatible chromatographic conditions. Annotation stages were evaluated against fixed workflow-derived references, including a comparison with unadjusted database retention times. Results: Unadjusted retention time matching recovered 55.4-77.2% of reference feature-lipid pairs, whereas adjusted matching recovered all reference pairs under identical tolerances. RT adjustment reduced candidates on non-reference features by 69.5-83.2% relative to mass-only matching and increased within-reference candidate discrimination from 69.1-70.9% to 88.5-92.6%. Isotope filtering and ambiguity resolution further restricted assignments. Integration across ionization modes yielded 433 and 379 endogenous feature records, respectively; 93 and 100 retained multiple compatible lipid identities rather than forcing unsupported unique assignments. Conclusions: Dataset-specific adjustment improves agreement with workflow-curated assignments while restricting candidate space. The approach supports reproducible lipid annotation and transparent uncertainty handling. Because the reference assignments originate from the workflow itself, complete retention does not establish independent annotation sensitivity or accuracy.

Related

  1. Untargeted Lipidomics Reveals Dynamic Changes to the HEK 293T Lipidome During Lentiviral Vector Production Over 72 Hours
    Joshua. A. Roberts, Elena Godbout, Jocelyn. A. Menard +3
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textEnzymology & metabolismChemRxiv
  2. An Annotation Consistency Checker for Evidence-Based Evaluation of Untargeted LC-MS/MS Metabolite Annotations
    Wilhan D. G. Nunes, Edward J. Mathias, Charles Terra +4
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationChemRxiv
  3. Closing the Translational Gap in Tuberculosis Lipidomics for Resource-Constrained Settings
    Joash Gombe, Gabriel Dida, Noel Onyango
    MetabolitesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textProteomics & metabolomicsEurope PMC
  4. Quantitative lipidomics reveals Lipid perturbation of plasma apoptotic extracellular vesicles during physiological aging
    Maojiao Li, Haisen Huang, Qi Tang
    Frontiers in cell and developmental biologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biochemistryEurope PMC
  5. Inhibitory Mechanism of Bee Venom Against A431 Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells Based on Label-Free Proteomics and Untargeted Metabolomics
    International journal of molecular sciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biochemistryEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{londonoosorio2026datasetspecific,
  title = {{Dataset-specific retention time adjustment and multi-evidence lipid annotation: a reproducible R workflow for untargeted LC–MS lipidomics}},
  author = {Sara Londoño-Osorio and Philippine Louail and Constantino A. García and Pablo Canadas-Miquel and Coral Barbas and Johannes Rainer and Ana Gradillas and Alberto Gil-de-la-Fuente and Alberto Gil de la Fuente},
  howpublished = {ChemRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.26434/chemrxiv.15011193/v1},
  url = {https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15011193/v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Dataset-specific retention time adjustment and multi-evidence lipid annotation: a reproducible R workflow for untargeted LC–MS lipidomics
AU  - Sara Londoño-Osorio
AU  - Philippine Louail
AU  - Constantino A. García
AU  - Pablo Canadas-Miquel
AU  - Coral Barbas
AU  - Johannes Rainer
AU  - Ana Gradillas
AU  - Alberto Gil-de-la-Fuente
AU  - Alberto Gil de la Fuente
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
PB  - ChemRxiv
DO  - 10.26434/chemrxiv.15011193/v1
UR  - https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15011193/v1
AB  - Background and Objective: Untargeted lipid annotation by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry is challenged by structural isomers, multiple ion forms, and retention time differences between analytical datasets. We developed an open-source computational workflow combining dataset-specific retention time adjustment with experimentally characterized lipid information to restrict candidate assignments while preserving unresolved identities. Methods: The R workflow uses a curated database of 592 lipid species derived from a human plasma reference material. It combines monotonic retention time adjustment, accurate-mass matching, isotope-pattern assessment, empirical adduct profile, and ambiguity resolution. Developed using a 40-sample MICROSAMPLING study, it was applied to an independent 189-sample METFORMIN-HIIE study acquired under compatible chromatographic conditions. Annotation stages were evaluated against fixed workflow-derived references, including a comparison with unadjusted database retention times. Results: Unadjusted retention time matching recovered 55.4-77.2% of reference feature-lipid pairs, whereas adjusted matching recovered all reference pairs under identical tolerances. RT adjustment reduced candidates on non-reference features by 69.5-83.2% relative to mass-only matching and increased within-reference candidate discrimination from 69.1-70.9% to 88.5-92.6%. Isotope filtering and ambiguity resolution further restricted assignments. Integration across ionization modes yielded 433 and 379 endogenous feature records, respectively; 93 and 100 retained multiple compatible lipid identities rather than forcing unsupported unique assignments. Conclusions: Dataset-specific adjustment improves agreement with workflow-curated assignments while restricting candidate space. The approach supports reproducible lipid annotation and transparent uncertainty handling. Because the reference assignments originate from the workflow itself, complete retention does not establish independent annotation sensitivity or accuracy.
ER  -