PATients’ views of Health and WORK advice (PATcHWORK) study

Abstract

Background: A variety of health and work support (H&WS) services are available in the UK, yet little is known about patients’ preferences for such support.

Aims: To develop an understanding of patients’ preferences for H&WS, including the type of support desired, optimal setting, timing and mode of delivery, appropriate providers, integration with existing services and views on employers’ receptiveness to H&WS information.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Participants were recruited through existing research networks and professional societies following informed consent. Interview questions were developed in collaboration with the University of Aberdeen Epidemiology Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement group. Interview responses were analysed using inductive and deductive reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Fifteen interviews were conducted with participants (11 females, 4 males; mean age 48.9 years), generating six overarching themes. Three themes related to ‘health and work issues’: disability discrimination, lack of H&WS awareness and trust concerns. Three themes identified key ‘H&WS factors’ for employment: flexible working, accessibility to support, and the importance of feeling valued and supported. Participants desired simplified yet holistic and flexible H&WS delivery. Key policy and practice considerations based on insights from this study include improving H&WS publicity through NHS websites and medical waiting areas, integration of work discussions into medical consultations and employer provision of evidence-based health promotion programmes and manager training.

Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights into patients’ preferences about H&WS delivery, highlighting crucial factors for employers and national policymakers to consider, aligned with the recently published Mayfield report.

Cognitive function and return to work: protocol for a longitudinal study investigating cognitive endurance in patients with stress-related disorders in primary health care in Sweden
Hanna Malmberg, Anastasiya Zakrevska, Magnus Johansson +6
BMJ Open6 Nov 2026Peer-reviewedLicence not statedGeneral medicineCrossref
Billing E-Visits and Patient Medical Advice Requests in a Large Academic Health Center
Anjali Bhatla, Helen K. Hughes, Maura J. McGuire +1
JAMA Network Open1 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
Exploring the views of people experiencing homelessness regarding their health and housing support, and their perspectives on deteriorating health and end of life support: a qualitative analysis
Samantha Dorney-Smith, Joel Barnett, Sarah Hough +7
BMJ Open9 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
A personal network analysis of health-advice seeking and dietary influence in a rural community
M.-G. Hancean, M.-C. Ghita, M. Perc +3
medRxiv1 Nov 2026PreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
Can users trust AI doctors? Unpacking the dual credibility pathways linking AI chatbot use to AI health advice adherence intention.
Zhanyou Wang, Jingru Wang, Dongmei Han +2
Frontiers in psychology7 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC

Cite

BibTeX RIS

BibTeX

@article{lin2026patients,
  title = {{PATients’ views of Health and WORK advice (PATcHWORK) study}},
  author = {K Lin and R Singhal and V Parsons and K Walker-Bone and G Wynne-Jones and E Godfrey and E Wainwright and I Madan},
  journal = {Occupational Medicine (Oxford, England)},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1093/occmed/kqag102},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqag102},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - PATients’ views of Health and WORK advice (PATcHWORK) study
AU  - K Lin
AU  - R Singhal
AU  - V Parsons
AU  - K Walker-Bone
AU  - G Wynne-Jones
AU  - E Godfrey
AU  - E Wainwright
AU  - I Madan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/21
JO  - Occupational Medicine (Oxford, England)
DO  - 10.1093/occmed/kqag102
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqag102
AB  - Background: A variety of health and work support (H&WS) services are available in the UK, yet little is known about patients’ preferences for such support.  Aims: To develop an understanding of patients’ preferences for H&WS, including the type of support desired, optimal setting, timing and mode of delivery, appropriate providers, integration with existing services and views on employers’ receptiveness to H&WS information.  Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Participants were recruited through existing research networks and professional societies following informed consent. Interview questions were developed in collaboration with the University of Aberdeen Epidemiology Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement group. Interview responses were analysed using inductive and deductive reflexive thematic analysis.  Results: Fifteen interviews were conducted with participants (11 females, 4 males; mean age 48.9 years), generating six overarching themes. Three themes related to ‘health and work issues’: disability discrimination, lack of H&WS awareness and trust concerns. Three themes identified key ‘H&WS factors’ for employment: flexible working, accessibility to support, and the importance of feeling valued and supported. Participants desired simplified yet holistic and flexible H&WS delivery. Key policy and practice considerations based on insights from this study include improving H&WS publicity through NHS websites and medical waiting areas, integration of work discussions into medical consultations and employer provision of evidence-based health promotion programmes and manager training.  Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights into patients’ preferences about H&WS delivery, highlighting crucial factors for employers and national policymakers to consider, aligned with the recently published Mayfield report.
SN  - 0962-7480
SN  - 1471-8405
ER  -

Abstract

Related

Cite